Eric Mann was sentenced to death by the State of Arizona for a double murder. According to court documents Eric Mann planned a drug rip off on victim Richard Alberts. However when Richard Alberts showed up at Mann’s home another man, Ramon Bazurto was with him. The two men came into the home and when Alberts opened the box containing the drugs he was shot in the head. Eric Mann would then shoot and kill Ramon Bazurto. The two bodies would later be dropped beside a roadway. The murders went unsolved until Eric Mann’s girlfriend reported him to police. Eric Mann was arrested, convicted and sentenced to death
Eric Mann 2021 Information
ASPC Florence, Central Unit
PO Box 8200
ERIC O. MANN 045676
Florence, AZ 85132
United States
Eric Mann More News
Mann decided to conduct a drug “rip-off” of a friend, Richard Alberts, and invited Alberts to buy drugs from him at his home. Alberts arrived at Mann’s home on the night of November 23, 1989, with a friend, Ramon Bazurto. Mann did not expect Bazurto. They went into Mann’s bedroom, where Mann handed Alberts a box that Alberts believed contained cocaine but actually contained paper. Alberts handed Mann a bag containing cash. When Alberts opened the box, Mann shot him and then shot Bazurto. Mann and his girlfriend took the bodies to Alberts car, and Mann and another friend drove to Graham County, where the deposited the bodies near a roadway. Mann and his girlfriend then bought paint and repainted the bedroom. The bodies were found the next day, November 24, 1989, but the murders remained unsolved until Mann’s girlfriend confessed her witnessing of the murders to Washington State authorities.
Eric Mann Other News
A divided federal appeals court Friday upheld the conviction and death sentence of a Pima County man in a 1989 drug deal turned double murder.
The full 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Eric Mann’s claims of ineffective counsel during his trial and sentencing were not sufficient to reopen his case.
Judge Richard R. Clifton wrote that there may have been questions about lower courts’ decisions in the case, but the law allowed the appeals court to get involved “only if no fairminded jurist could conclude” that the lower court had not acted fairly.
That was not the case here, he wrote.
But in one of two partial dissents, Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas said that Mann’s lawyer had been ineffective at his sentencing and should have presented evidence of that a 1985 car accident may have caused brain damage in Mann.
“Any reasonable attorney would further investigate whether a car accident that left two out of three passengers dead resulted in any permanent physical or psychological damage to Mann, the sole survivor,” Thomas wrote.
Mann’s attorneys said the dissent “was absolutely correct, and that, as Judge Thomas concluded: Eric Mann’s death sentence was imposed in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.”
The attorney, Arizona Federal Public Defender Cary Sandman, said in an email that they plan to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Arizona Attorney General’s office declined to comment on the ruling.
The case began when Mann offered to sell Richard Alberts a kilogram of cocaine for $20,000. The sale was a ruse, the court said, with Mann intending to give Alberts a shoebox full of newspaper and then shoot him after taking the money.
Alberts showed up at Mann’s home on Thanksgiving Day 1989 with another man, Ramon Bazurto. After first hesitating because of Bazurto’s presence, Mann went ahead with the deal – and shot both men.
Alberts died “almost instantly,” but Bazurto lingered and Mann stood over him as he died. Mann got a friend, Carlos Alejandro, to help get rid of the bodies.
The case went unsolved for four years until Mann broke up with his girlfriend, Karen Miller, who had been at the home during the killings.
Miller turned him in to police, and she and Alejandro were granted full immunity in the case in exchange for testifying against Mann. He was convicted in 1994 of both murders and sentenced to death in 1995.
In his latest appeal, Mann claimed his attorney was ineffective both at trial and at sentencing. The court rejected the claim for his trial, but split on whether his attorney served him at sentencing.
A key element of that disagreement was over whether his attorney should have more aggressively pursued evidence that the 1985 car accident could have affected Mann, which could have been used as a mitigating factor against the death penalty.
While Thomas said it should have been considered, Clifton noted that Mann’s criminal behavior changed little from before the accident to after, a fact noted by the trial judge.
“Even if the accident had an effect on Mann’s personality, it hardly changed an altar boy into a callous criminal,” Clifton wrote for the majority.