Benny Hodge Kentucky Death Row

benny hodge

Benny Hodge was sentenced to death by the State of Kentucky for the murder of a woman during a robbery. According to court documents Benny Hodge and Roger Epperson entered a home in Kentucky. Once inside they choked a male occupant unconscious before stabbing the man’s daughter to death. Benny Hodge and Roger Epperson were both arrested, convicted and sentenced to death. Roger Epperson is currently going through a resentencing and is no longer listed as being on Kentucky’s death row

Kentucky Death Row Inmate List

Benny Hodge 2021 Information

bennry hodge 2021
Name:HODGE, BENNY LEE
Active Inmate
DEATH ROW

Offender Photo(Click image to enlarge)
PID # / DOC #:215174 / 032835
Institution Start Date:6/21/1986
Expected Time To Serve (TTS):DEATH SENTENCE
Classification:Maximum
Minimum Expiration of Sentence Date (Good Time Release Date): ?DEATH SENTENCE
Parole Eligibility Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Maximum Expiration of Sentence Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Location:Kentucky State Penitentiary
Age:69
Race:White
Gender:M
Eye Color:Hazel
Hair Color:Brown
Height:6′ 1 “
Weight:205

Benny Hodge More News

Hodge was sentenced to death on June 20, 1986 in Letcher County along with Roger Epperson for the murder of Tammy Acker. The murder occurred when Hodge and two accomplices entered the home of a Fleming-Neon, Kentucky physician on the night of August 8, 1985. They choked the man unconscious, and stabbed his daughter, Tammy Acker, to death while robbing him of $1.9 million, handguns, and jewelry. He was arrested in Florida on August 15, 1985. He also received a second death sentence on November 22, 1996 for the murder and robbery of Bessie and Edwin Morris in their home in Gray Hawk, Kentucky on June 16, 1985.

Benny Hodge Other News

Hodge and two others posed as Federal Bureau of Investigation agents to gain entry to the home of a doctor. Once inside, they strangled the doctor into unconsciousness, stabbed his college-aged daughter to death, and stole around $2 million in cash, as well as jewelry and guns, from a safe. A jury convicted Hodge and a codefendant of murder and related charges. Epperson v. Commonwealth, 809 S. W. 2d 835, 837 (Ky. 1990). In advance of the penalty phase of his trial, Hodge’s counsel conducted no investigation into potential mitigation evidence and presented no evidence to the jury. The Commonwealth did not put on evidence of aggravating circumstances either, beyond the facts of the crime. Instead, the parties agreed that the jury should be read this stipulation: ” ‘Benny Lee Hodge has a loving and supportive family–a wife and three children. He has a public job work record and he lives and resides permanently in Tennessee.’ ” App. to Pet. for Cert. 5. After hearing argument from counsel on both sides, the jury recommended a sentence of death, which the trial court imposed.

     On postconviction review in Kentucky state court, Hodge alleged that his counsel had been ineffective during the penalty phase for failing to investigate, discover, and present readily available mitigation evidence concerning his childhood, which was marked by extreme abuse. Hodge was granted an evidentiary hearing, during which he presented extensive mitigation evidence and the testimony of expert psychologists. The Commonwealth did not contest Hodge’s evidence, although it did not concede that all the evidence would have been available or admissible at the time of trial. The Kentucky Supreme Court credited the evidence and found it would have been available at the time of trial. The evidence established the following:

     The beatings began in utero. Hodge’s father battered his mother while she carried Hodge in her womb, and continued to beat her once Hodge was born, even while she held the infant in her arms. When Hodge was a few years older, he escaped his mother’s next husband, a drunkard, by staying with his stepfather’s parents, bootleggers who ran a brothel. His mother next married Billy Joe. Family members described Billy Joe as a ” ‘monster.’ ” Id., at 7. Billy Joe controlled what little money the family had, leaving them to live in abject poverty. He beat Hodge’s mother relentlessly, once so severely that she had a miscarriage. He raped her regularly. And he threatened to kill her while pointing a gun at her. All of this abuse occurred while Hodge and his sisters could see or hear. And following many beatings, Hodge and his sisters thought their mother was dead.

     Billy Joe also targeted Hodge’s sisters, molesting at least one of them. But according to neighbors and family members, as the only male in the house, Hodge bore the brunt of Billy Joe’s anger, especially when he tried to defend his mother and sisters from attack. Billy Joe often beat Hodge with a belt, sometimes leaving imprints from his belt buckle on Hodge’s body. Hodge was kicked, thrown against walls, and punched. Billy Joe once made Hodge watch while he brutally killed Hodge’s dog. On another occasion, Billy Joe rubbed Hodge’s nose in his own feces.

     The abuse took its toll on Hodge. He had been an average student in school, but he began to change when Billy Joe entered his life. He started stealing around age 12, and wound up in juvenile detention for his crimes. There, Hodge was beaten routinely and subjected to frequent verbal and emotional abuse. After assaulting Billy Joe at age 16, Hodge returned to juvenile detention, where the abuse continued. Hodge remained there until he was 18. Over the 16 years between his release from juvenile detention and the murder, Hodge committed various theft crimes that landed him in prison for about 13 of those years. He twice escaped, but each time, he was recaptured.

     Psychologists who testified at Hodge’s evidentiary hearing, and were credited by the court below, explained that the degree of domestic violence Hodge suffered was extremely damaging to his development. The environment caused ” ‘hypervigilance’ “–a state of constant anxiety that left Hodge always ” ‘waiting for the next shoe to fall.’ ” Pet. for Cert. 7. It taught him ” ‘that the world was a hostile place and that he was not going to be able to count on anybody else to protect him’ “–not his family and not society. Id., at 8. Being taken to a juvenile facility only to be beaten more likely hit Hodge as a ” ‘double betrayal.’ ” Id., at 9. The result was that Hodge had posttraumatic stress disorder. Unable to control his behavior and his emotions because of PTSD, he turned to drugs and alcohol to numb his feelings. This condition could have been diagnosed at the time of his trial.

     The Commonwealth conceded that counsel was deficient for failing to gather and present this evidence at the penalty phase of Hodge’s trial. But it contended that Hodge would have been sentenced to death even if the evidence had been presented. Examining the evidence, the Kentucky Supreme Court had “no doubt that Hodge, as a child, suffered a most severe and unimaginable level of physical and mental abuse.” App. to Pet. for Cert. 11. Yet it felt “compelled to reach the conclusion that there exists no reasonable probability that the jury would not have sentenced Hodge to death” anyway. Ibid.

     The Court based its conclusion in part on the aggravating circumstances against which the jury would have had to weigh the mitigation evidence. The murder itself was “calculated and exceedingly cold-hearted.” Id., at 9. Hodge stabbed the daughter “at least ten times,” and he “coolly” told his codefendant that he knew the daughter “was dead because the knife had gone ‘all the way through her to the floor.’ ” Id., at 10. Hodge’s conduct after the murder was shocking as well: He and the two other robbers “brazenly spent the stolen money on a lavish lifestyle and luxury goods, including a Corvette,” and Hodge told a cellmate he had “sprea[d] all the money out on a bed and ha[d] sex with his girlfriend on top of it.” Ibid. Moreover, had Hodge put on evidence in mitigation, the Commonwealth may have sought to introduce evidence of Hodge’s “long and increasingly violent criminal history, his numerous escapes from custody, and the obvious failure of several rehabilitative efforts.” Id., at 9.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/11-10974.html

Randy Haight Kentucky Death Row

Randy Haight

Randy Haight was sentenced to death by the State of Kentucky for a double murder following a prison escape. According to court document Randy Haight broke out of the Johnson County Jail with another inmate. The bodies of Patricia Vance and David Omer were found dead inside of their car. Randy Haight would be arrested days later, convicted and sentenced to death

Kentucky Death Row Inmate List

Randy Haight 2021 Information

Randy Haight 2021
Name:HAIGHT, RANDY
Active Inmate
DEATH ROW
PID # / DOC #:207803 / 086706
Institution Start Date:10/14/1981
Expected Time To Serve (TTS):DEATH SENTENCE
Classification:Maximum
Minimum Expiration of Sentence Date (Good Time Release Date): ?DEATH SENTENCE
Parole Eligibility Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Maximum Expiration of Sentence Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Location:Kentucky State Penitentiary
Age:68
Race:White
Gender:M
Eye Color:Blue
Hair Color:Brown
Height:5′ 08″
Weight:155

Randy Haight More News

Randy Haight escaped from the Johnson County Jail August 18, 1985 with his girlfriend and another male inmate. He was there while awaiting trials in three counties. He stole guns and several cars; shot at a KY. State Police Trooper and caused another police officer’s death in a gunfight. He executed a young couple while they were inside their car. He shot the man in the face, chest, shoulder, and back of the head and shot the woman in the shoulder, temple, the back of the head, and through the eye. He spent all but two of his 15 adult years in four Ohio, three Virginia, and four Kentucky prisons.

Randy Height was sentenced to death March 22, 1994 for the murder of Patricia Vance and David Omer on August 22, 1985.

http://www.lexingtonprosecutor.com/court-info/deathrow/

Randy Haight Other News

Haight was sentenced to death on March 22, 1994 in Jefferson County for the murder of Patricia Vance and David Omer on August 22, 1985. Haight escaped from Johnson County Jail on August 18, 1985 with his girlfriend and another male inmate while awaiting trial. The bodies of Vance and Omer were discovered inside their car near Herrington Lake in Garrard County. Haight was apprehended in a cornfield in Mercer County on August 23, 1985.

Johnathan Goforth Kentucky Death Row

Johnathan Goforth was sentenced to death by the State of Kentucky for the murder of an elderly woman. According to court documents Johnathan Goforth and Virginia Caudill would enter an elderly woman’s home and beat the 73 year old woman to death. The pair would then place her body into her truck, drive it to a remote location and set it on fire. Both Johnathan Goforth and Virginia Caudill would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Kentucky Death Row Inmate List

Johnathan Goforth 2021 Information

johnathan goforth 2021
Name:GOFORTH, JOHNATHON WAYNE
Active Inmate
DEATH ROW
PID # / DOC #:244653 / 127520
Institution Start Date:3/31/2000
Expected Time To Serve (TTS):DEATH SENTENCE
Classification:Maximum
Minimum Expiration of Sentence Date (Good Time Release Date): ?DEATH SENTENCE
Parole Eligibility Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Maximum Expiration of Sentence Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Location:Kentucky State Penitentiary
Age:60
Race:White
Gender:M
Eye Color:Blue
Hair Color:Brown
Height:5′ 11″
Weight:225

Johnathan Goforth More News

Goforth was sentenced to death on March 24, 2000 in Fayette County for murder, robbery I, burglary I, arson II, and tampering with physical evidence. On March 15, 1998, Goforth and accomplice Virginia Caudill entered the home of a 73 year old female, beat her to death and then burglarized her home. They then placed her body in the truck of her own vehicle and drove her to a rural area in Fayette County and set the car on fire.

Johnathan Goforth Other News

Lonetta White, age 73, was bludgeoned to death in her home in Lexington, Kentucky, during the early morning hours of March 15, 1998.   Her body was found in the trunk of her burning automobile in a field several miles away.   Her home was ransacked and numerous items of personal property, including two guns, jewelry, and a mink coat were stolen.   Appellants Caudill and Goforth admitted they were present at the commission of all of these crimes.   Each, however, accused the other of murdering and robbing the victim and of setting fire to the automobile.

Caudill had been living with the victim’s son, Steve White, but had moved out of his house on either March 13 or 14 following an argument concerning Caudill’s drug use.   Caudill went to a nearby “crack house,” a residence where drug users gathered to buy, sell, and ingest controlled substances, especially crack cocaine.   There she encountered Goforth, a casual acquaintance whom she had not seen for about fifteen years.   Caudill testified that, on the afternoon of March 14, Goforth gave her a ride to Mrs. White’s residence and that Caudill induced White to give her twenty or thirty dollars on the pretext that she needed the money to rent a room for the night.   Instead, she returned to the crack house and used the money to purchase crack cocaine.   At about 3:00 a.m. on March 15, Caudill and Goforth returned to Mrs. White’s residence.

According to Caudill, she went to the door and told Mrs. White that she needed more money for the room rental.   Goforth remained out of sight near the garage.   When Mrs. White turned away to retrieve the money, Goforth burst through the door and attacked her without warning.   Caudill did not identify the weapon used by Goforth but remembered that, during the course of the attack, Mrs. White pleaded with her to “please help me, Virginia.”   Goforth then took Caudill to a bedroom and bound her hands together.   After killing White, Goforth ransacked the residence, loaded the jewelry, guns, and mink coat into his pickup truck, and wrapped the body in a carpet.   He then prevailed upon Caudill to help him carry the body to the garage and load it into the trunk of Mrs. White’s automobile.   The two then drove both vehicles to a vacant field where Goforth doused Mrs. White’s vehicle with gasoline and set it afire.

According to Goforth, Caudill induced Mrs. White to admit them into her residence under the pretext that they were having car trouble and needed to use White’s telephone.   Once inside, Caudill demanded that Mrs. White give her some money.   When White refused, Caudill unexpectedly produced a roofer’s hammer that she had surreptitiously removed from Goforth’s pickup truck and struck White in the back of the head with full force.   When Goforth asked Caudill why she had struck Mrs. White, Caudill struck her again.   As Caudill continued to bludgeon the victim with the hammer, Goforth went into the living room, sat down on a sofa, and pondered what he should do next.   Caudill ransacked the victim’s residence and loaded the stolen property into Goforth’s pickup truck.   She wrapped Mrs. White’s body in the carpet.   At Caudill’s request, Goforth helped carry the body to the garage and load it into the trunk of White’s automobile.   They then drove both vehicles to a vacant field where Caudill doused White’s automobile with gasoline and set it afire.

Cynthia Ellis, a jailhouse informant, testified that Caudill told her that she had gone to White’s residence to obtain money to buy drugs.   When White refused her request for money, Caudill struck White twice in the head with a clock that she pulled off the wall.   Julia Davis, another jailhouse informant, testified that Caudill told her that she broke into the victim’s home intending to steal money to buy drugs, but when the victim discovered her presence, she killed her, stole her guns and jewelry, and set fire to her car.   Davis also testified that Caudill said White had pleaded with her to “[h]elp me, why are you doing this to me?”

Because of her known relationship with the victim’s son, Caudill was questioned by police about the murder on the evening of March 15, 1998.   She denied any involvement in the crimes and told the police that she had been with Goforth when the crimes were committed. The police unsuccessfully attempted to contact Goforth at his residence and left a message there for Goforth to contact them.   Instead, Goforth and Caudill fled Fayette County.   They spent several days at a cabin near Herrington Lake in Mercer County, then moved to Ocala, Florida, then to Gulfport, Mississippi.   Caudill left Goforth in Gulfport and moved to New Orleans, Louisiana, where she was subsequently arrested November 11, 1998.   She gave another statement at that time in which she admitted her presence at the scene of the crimes but named Goforth as the perpetrator.   Goforth was arrested and questioned in Gulfport, Mississippi, on December 8, 1998.   He claimed Caudill killed Mrs. White with the hammer and, further, that an unidentified African-American male had assisted Caudill in the commission of the crimes (an assertion he admitted at trial was a fabrication).   After her extradition to Kentucky, Caudill gave a third statement to police on December 9, 1998, which was substantially the same as her second statement.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ky-supreme-court/1333320.html

Fred Furnish Kentucky Death Row

fred furnish

Fred Furnish was sentenced to death by the State of Kentucky for a robbery murder. According to court documents Fred Furnish broke into the victims home and proceeded to strangle the victim to death. Fred Furnish would then rob her home and use her debit card to make withdrawals. Fred Furnish would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Kentucky Death Row Inmate List

Fred Furnish 2021 Information

fred furnish
Name:FURNISH, FRED
Active Inmate
DEATH ROW

PID # / DOC #:219712 / 127518
Institution Start Date:7/08/1999
Expected Time To Serve (TTS):DEATH SENTENCE
Classification:Maximum
Minimum Expiration of Sentence Date (Good Time Release Date): ?DEATH SENTENCE
Parole Eligibility Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Maximum Expiration of Sentence Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Location:Kentucky State Penitentiary
Age:53
Race:White
Gender:M
Eye Color:Hazel
Hair Color:Brown
Height:6′ 1 “
Weight:230

Fred Furnish More News

Furnish was sentenced to death on July 8, 1999 in Kenton County for the murder of Ramona Jean Williamson. On June 25, 1998, Furnish entered into Mrs. Williamson’s Crestview Hills home and strangled the victim to death. After killing Mrs. Williamson, Furnish used her debit cards to withdraw money from her bank accounts. The jury also found Furnish guilty of robbery, burglary, theft, and receiving stolen money by fraud. Furnish, who had several convictions for theft and burglary, spent nearly a dozen years behind bars in Kentucky and Indiana. Each time he was released, he soon returned to prison for another burglary. By the time he was released in April, 1997, he had hit a prison guard, adding an assault charge to his record.

Fred Furnish Other News

This case arose on June 25, 1998, when a 66-year-old widow was found strangled to death in her Crestview Hills home.   The residence had been ransacked, and jewelry and credit cards were stolen.   During the guilt phase of the trial, the defense conceded that Appellant was “a thief and a burglar” and that he had been at the residence on the day of the murder, but denied the actual killing, claiming that another “mystery person” was the one who murdered the woman.   After a 17-day trial, the jury found Appellant guilty of murder and other offenses including first-degree robbery and first-degree burglary.

Upon direct appeal, this Court affirmed Appellant’s conviction for murder and other related crimes but held that the trial court erred in denying Appellant the benefit of a newly enacted statutory provision which authorized a sentence of life without the benefit of probation or parole in capital murder cases.   For that reason, the case was remanded for a new penalty phase where Appellant would be given an instruction on life without possibility of parole.1

At the retrial of the penalty phase, testimony was not received with respect to Appellant’s guilt.   A factual narrative, agreed upon by both parties, was read to the jury and certified copies of the convictions were introduced.   The new jury recommended a death sentence.   Appellant waived a presentence investigation report and requested to be sentenced immediately after the victim impact statements were presented to the court.   He was again sentenced to death.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ky-supreme-court/1204989.html

Robert Foley Kentucky Death Row

robert foley

Robert Foley was sentenced to death by the State of Kentucky for six murders. According to court documents Robert Foley would shoot and kill two brothers Rodney and Lynn Vaughn. Two years earlier Robert Foley would shoot and kill four people,  Kimberly Bowersock, Lillian Contino, Jerry McMillen, and Calvin Reynolds who he believed reported him to his parole officer. Robert Foley would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Kentucky Death Row Inmate List

Robert Foley 2021 Information

robert foley
Name:FOLEY, ROBERT KARL LEE
Active Inmate
DEATH ROW

PID # / DOC #:201029 / 077421
Institution Start Date:4/20/1977
Expected Time To Serve (TTS):DEATH SENTENCE
Classification:Maximum
Minimum Expiration of Sentence Date (Good Time Release Date): ?DEATH SENTENCE
Parole Eligibility Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Maximum Expiration of Sentence Date:DEATH SENTENCE
Location:Kentucky State Penitentiary
Age:64
Race:White
Gender:M
Eye Color:Blue
Hair Color:Brown
Height:5′ 7 “
Weight:210

Robert Foley More News

Foley was sentenced to death on September 23, 1993 in Laurel County for the murders of two brothers, Rodney and Lynn Vaughn, during an argument at his residence on August 17, 1991 in Madison County. On April 27, 1994 he was given a second death sentence in Madison County for the murders of Kimberly Bowersock, Lillian Contino, Jerry McMillen, and Calvin Reynolds. He shout the four victims on October 8, 1989 because he thought one of them had reported him to his parole officer.

Robert Foley Other News

The victims were last seen alive on October 8, 1989.   Their bodies were found two years later in a septic tank located on the “Murphy Gross property” in the Bald Rock community of Laurel County, Kentucky.2  When the bodies were discovered, the property was titled in the name of Appellant’s father, John Foley.   Murphy Gross had died on August 30, 1989, and his widow had deeded the property to Appellant’s father in June 1990.   However, during a hearing on his pretrial motion to suppress evidence of the discovery of the victims’ bodies, Appellant admitted that he was the actual owner of the property and that he had placed the title in his father’s name to protect it from a judgment creditor.   The property was resold to a third party in July 1993, long after the victims’ bodies were discovered and Appellant had been charged with their murders.   The Murphy Gross property lies adjacent to property which was owned in 1989 by Murphy Gross’s nephew, David Gross.   David Gross and his domestic companion, Phoebe Watts, along with Watts’s two minor children, lived in a cabin on that property.   Gordon Canter had previously lived in the cabin, and he and Gross grew marijuana on the property.   There is substantial evidence in the record that Appellant, Gross, Canter and Paul (Butch) Riley, a key figure in Appellant’s motion for a new trial, engaged in various criminal enterprises together during the late 1980’s.

To place Appellant’s newly discovered evidence in proper perspective, it is necessary to review the evidence that was known at the time of his trial.   Kim Bowersock, Lillian Contino and Jerry McMillan all resided in Van Wert, Ohio. Calvin Reynolds, Bowersock’s boyfriend, lived in a house in Laurel County, Kentucky, not far from David Gross’s cabin.   While returning from Murphy Gross’s funeral on September 2, 1989, Reynolds was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated (DUI).   Bowersock and Gordon Canter were passengers in Reynolds’s vehicle at the time.   They were charged with alcohol intoxication and subsequently released.   Reynolds, however, remained in jail until October 7, 1989.

Bowersock’s cousin, Theresa Duncell, also of Van Wert, Ohio, testified that on October 8, 1989, Bowersock was trying to find someone to drive her from Van Wert to Kentucky.   There is evidence that Bowersock intended to pick up Reynolds in Kentucky and bring him back with her to Ohio. Duncell was unable to make the trip, but agreed to help Bowersock find someone else to drive her to Kentucky.   They proceeded first to Lillian Contino’s residence, but Contino’s car was not in working order.   Contino, however, offered to accompany Bowersock to Kentucky if they could find a ride.   The three women then proceeded to the residence of Duncell’s sister, where, by chance, they encountered Jerry McMillan.   Bowersock asked McMillan if he would drive her to Kentucky and McMillan agreed to do so.

Reynolds was supposed to meet Bowersock at David Gross’s cabin.   However, when Bowersock, Contino and McMillan arrived at the cabin, only Gross and Gordon Canter were there.   Reynolds had returned to his own residence.   The three Ohio residents then picked up Reynolds at his residence and all four returned to Gross’s cabin.   Meanwhile, Canter had telephoned Appellant to tell him that Bowersock was in the area.   According to Canter, Appellant had a grudge against Bowersock because he believed she had informed his parole officer that he (Appellant) was selling drugs and “moonshining” illegal whiskey.  (Appellant admits in one of his post-trial affidavits that he, Canter and Gross sold drugs and “ran a moonshine still.”)   Upon being informed that Bowersock was in the area, Appellant told Canter that he was going to “kick her a_,” asked Canter how many people were with Bowersock, and told Canter to meet Appellant at his house and to bring his (Appellant’s) guns.3  Three other witnesses, Allen and Imal Zannet and Appellant’s ex-wife, Marjorie Foley, were in the same room with Appellant when this conversation took place and all confirmed Canter’s version of the statements made to him by Appellant.   Marjorie Foley further testified that Appellant told her when he left that night that if he did not return by morning, he would be either dead or in jail and that she should so notify his parents in Harlan County.   When Appellant did not return the next morning, Marjorie notified Appellant’s parents who then drove to Laurel County to investigate.

Robert Foley and Canter arrived at David Gross’s cabin shortly after 11:30 p.m. on October 8th.   Those present in the cabin when they arrived were Bowersock, Reynolds, Contino, McMillan, David Gross, Phoebe Watts and Watts’s two minor children.   Canter and Watts both testified that immediately upon entering the cabin, Appellant went to Bowersock and grabbed her by the hair.   When Reynolds arose to her assistance, Appellant drew his 9-mm pistol and shot Reynolds first, then Bowersock, then Contino, then McMillan.   He pointed the gun at David Gross, but did not shoot when Gross begged for his life.   Appellant then returned to Bowersock and shot her again in the head.   Following the murders, Appellant, Gross and Canter confiscated the victims’ valuables and removed the bodies from the cabin to a log-hauling trailer.   Watts then cleaned up the cabin while the three men took McMillan’s car to Lexington and abandoned it in a motel parking lot.   Canter testified that Appellant, identifying himself as Calvin Reynolds, called an automobile repair shop, requested that the vehicle be picked up for repairs, and promised to retrieve it at a later date.   Canter stated that he never saw the vehicle again and all efforts to locate it prior to trial were futile.   The three men returned to Gross’s cabin and slept the following day.   The next night, they removed the victims’ bodies from the trailer, placed them in Murphy Gross’s septic tank, and covered them with lime and cement.

In October 1990, David Gross was shot and killed in a murder which remains unsolved.4  In the fall of 1991, Appellant was arrested for killing two Laurel County brothers, Lynn and Rodney Vaughn.   See Foley v. Commonwealth, Ky., 942 S.W.2d 876 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 893, 118 S.Ct. 234, 139 L.Ed.2d 165 (1997).   Shortly thereafter, Watts, who then lived in Tennessee, and Canter, who then lived in Arizona, came forward separately and gave virtually identical statements to the police about the murders of Bowersock, Reynolds, Contino and McMillan.

The theory advanced in Appellant’s motion for a new trial is that David Gross and Gordon Canter killed the four victims because they had stolen “a lot” of marijuana from Gross, and that the victims were shot not in Gross’s cabin, but while seated in McMillan’s car.   Further, McMillan’s car was not driven to Lexington and abandoned in a motel parking lot, but was instead dismantled, the car seat burned, the car doors burned and deposited in a valley referred to locally as “the egg,” and the remainder compacted at a Laurel County salvage yard.   The initial “newly discovered evidence” supporting this theory was an anonymous, handwritten letter that Appellant claims to have received in October 1996.   Appellant showed the letter to his attorney, who advised him that an anonymous letter would not support a motion for a new trial.

Appellant later produced a typewritten letter from Paul (Butch) Riley, one of his former criminal associates, dated May 17, 1997, less than thirty days after the rendition of this Court’s opinion affirming Appellant’s conviction and sentence.   The letter was signed, “always and ever your friend and brother Butch.”   Both Appellant and Riley are inmates at the state prison at Eddyville.5  The substance of Riley’s letter is that during the summer of 1994, while Riley was incarcerated in a federal penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana, he had a telephone conversation with Gordon Canter, who was then at the Grand Hotel in Hamilton, Ohio;  and that Canter told him that Appellant did not commit the Bald Rock murders.  (Riley’s letter did not assert that Canter admitted committing the murders, himself.)   Canter denies the conversation and denies ever staying at the Grand Hotel.   The record also contains the affidavit of Linda Sheehan to the effect that in the summer of 1994, she forwarded calls from Riley to the Grand Hotel where Riley’s mother was employed as a bartender.   Sheehan does not state that she forwarded any calls to Canter.   Riley’s letter was subsequently reduced to an affidavit, which states in pertinent part:

Gordon said he had to go to court and testify against Bob Foley and it was bugging him.   That it was his way of coming clean and out from under it.   Gordon said he had to go to court against Bob Foley on 4 more murder charges.   I ask [sic] him what was up and he said they had Bob Foley on 2 other murder charges and he was going to fry anyhow, and besides if Foley had of [sic] been there he would have been in on it anyway.   Gordon said the ones that got killed had it coming because they stole a lot of pot from Dave Gross.   He also said, Foley had got Dave Gross killed on a bad dope deal.   Gordon told me he and Dave stashed the bodies in a trailer and later buried them in a[sic] old septic tank.   That they used lime to eat up the bodies.   Gordon even mentioned getting rid of part of the car in the egg pit and burning it.   That the rest of the car went to the junkyard and was crushed.   I asked Gordon just how many people was it that Foley had suppose [sic] to have killed.   Gordon said, as far as he new [sic] just the 2 brothers in London.   I said, so he didn’t kill the 4 in the septic tank, and Gordon said no he didn’t, but it didn’t matter because Bob Foley was going to fry on the other 2 murders anyhow.

Appellant’s final item of newly discovered evidence is the affidavit of his “step-cousin,” Chris Allen.   According to Allen, he proceeded at Appellant’s direction to a seventy-foot cliff above a section of “the egg.”   After rappelling down the cliff, Allen discovered two rusty car doors which appeared to have been burned.   Each door contained two holes which Allen “thought could be bullet holes.”   Allen then discovered what he believed to be an automobile ignition key, a post office box key, and a set of “dogtags” (but not standard military identification tags) inside one of the door panels.   The dogtags contained the name, address, social security number and date of birth of Jerry McMillan.   McMillan’s father and brother subsequently confirmed that McMillan owned and occasionally wore dogtags similar to those alleged to have been found by Allen.   Allen hoisted the car doors out of “the egg” and took them to a body shop mechanic.   The mechanic compared the doors to those on a 1975 Chevrolet Malibu and filed an affidavit to the effect that the burned doors “could possibly have come from a 1975 Chevy Malibu.”   In fact, the record contains several descriptions of McMillan’s vehicle, none of which identify it as a Malibu.   Canter testified that he thought the vehicle he drove to Lexington after the murders was a 1970 Chevelle.   McMillan’s mother filed a missing person’s report in 1989 describing her son’s vehicle as a 1975 Chevy Nova. Bowersock’s mother told the police that her daughter had left Ohio on October 8, 1989 in a Pontiac LeMans with Ohio tag number 567-RTP.

While this evidence may be “newly discovered,” Appellant’s theory of the case is not.   During his cross-examination of Gordon Canter at the 1994 trial, Appellant’s attorney posited that Canter and David Gross had killed the four victims and that Canter had decided to place the blame on Appellant because Appellant was already in jail on other capital charges.   Canter denied this assertion.   Further, Crocket (“Mel”) Stevens, a self-described lifelong friend of Appellant, testified at trial that Canter told him in the spring of 1990 that he and David Gross had “offed” some people after “ripping them off.”   During his sworn statement given in response to Appellant’s motion for a new trial, Canter produced a letter from Stevens, dated July 14, 1997, in which Stevens urged Canter to blame Gross for the murders, because “Dave is dead and no one needs to protect him any longer.”

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ky-supreme-court/1343065.html