Hayley Bowden was sixteen when she murdered an elderly woman. According to court documents Hayley and her boyfriend were staying in a home without permission, when the victim found them instead of leaving the couple would stab the man repeatedly causing his death and attempted to burn the house down. Hayley and her boyfriend would steal his truck which was recovered in a pond. The two would eventually be arrested and found guilty on the robbery and murder charges. Due to her age the teen killer was sentenced to forty years in prison
A teenager who stabbed an elderly man in Walton County a couple of years ago finally plead before the court Tuesday.
According to State Attorney Bill Eddins, Hayley accepted an open plea for First Degree Premeditated Murder and/or Felony Murder along with other charges on October 6th in lieu of taking her case to trial.
She could face life in prison when sentenced on January 19, 2016.
Bowden stabbed 77-year-old Arthur Anderson after he discovered that she and her boyfriend Crispin Ramirez were living in a DeFuniak Springs home for which he was the caretaker.
According to the state attorney’s office, Bowden then collected several items from the residence and loaded them into one of Anderson’s vehicles while Ramirez set fire to the house and his other automobiles.
Officials say the two were later apprehended by the Walton County Sheriff’s Office but not before Ramirez threatened deputies and exploded homemade fire bombs to resist arrest. We are told Bowden fled into the woods.
The state attorney’s office says Bowden confessed to all the crimes she was charged with after being arrested.
Ramirez made a deal with the state back in September 2014, to avoid the death penalty. He plead guilty to First Degree Murder and will spend the rest of his life behind bars.
Hayley Bowden More News
Hayley Bowden, who at the age of 16 participated in the 2013 killing of elderly Mossy Head resident Arthur Anderson, was sentenced Tuesday to 40 years in prison.
Circuit Court Judge Kelvin Wells ordered Bowden to serve 40 years on one count of felony murder, 40 years on a count of burglary with assault and five years for grand theft.
The sentences will be served concurrently, however, and Bowden, by virtue of her age, will be eligible in 25 years for a review of her sentence, said Assistant State Attorney Josh Mitchell, who represented the state at Tuesday’s sentencing hearing.
Bowden’s boyfriend at the time of the crime, then 22-year-old Crispin Ramirez, was sentenced to life in prison in September of 2014 for his role in the Anderson killing.
“The citizens of Walton County are going to be safer for the next 40 years,” Mitchell said after Tuesday’s hearing. “I think Mr. Ramirez and Ms. Bowden posed a great risk to the citizens of Walton County, as evidenced by the crime spree they went on in 2013.”
Anderson was a caretaker for a home on West Juniper Avenue in Mossy Head on Jan. 24, 2013, when he confronted Bowden and Ramirez and was stabbed to death, according to news reports.
Bowden had run away from home and she and Ramirez had taken up residence in the home Anderson was looking after.
Both Bowden and Ramirez “participated and contributed to the death of Mr. Anderson” by repeatedly stabbing him, Mitchell told the court last year when Bowden agreed to plead guilty.
Walton County deputies were unaware Bowden and Ramirez had killed Anderson when they originally encountered the two Jan. 24. They were looking for a runaway, but arrested the pair when Ramirez threatened officers with a knife, reports said.
Suspicions rose when Anderson’s truck was found in a pond near where the stabbing took place.
Bowden and Ramirez had stolen Anderson’s vehicle and also attempted to burn down the home where they’d left his body.
One reason for the delays in sentencing Bowden was that her attorneys had filed motions calling the defendant’s competency into question.
Judge Wells ultimately ruled Bowden competent to stand trial, according to State Attorney Bill Eddins.
“We’ve been back and forth over the last year trying to get this resolved,” Mitchell said
teenage runaway and her boyfriend are accused of murdering a 77-year-old Walton County man Thursday night.
The suspects and the victim are all from Walton County’s Mossy Head community.
Walton County Sheriff Michael Adkinson announced the charges early Friday afternoon, saying that the two had already been tracked down by the time the murder came to light. After 16-year-old Haley Nicole Bowden had been reported as a runaway, a tip led deputies and tracking dogs to a home in the Mossy Head Community. They found her there with 22-year-old Chrispen Ramirez on Thursday at a dwelling on Eagles Way. When officers approached, Bowden and Ramirez ran away, officials said. K-9 units were put on their trail and tracked the two down.
Ramirez was armed with knives at the scene and threatened the lives of deputies, authorities reported in a press release about the chain of events leading to the arrests of Bowden and Ramirez and the charges against them. Deputies were able to subdue Ramirez and took him to jail, along with Bowden, on various charges related to that encounter. At that point, Ramirez was charged with interference with child custody and assault on a law enforcement officer. Bowden was charged at that point with resisting an officer without violence.
But officials would soon level more serious charges against them.
Around the same time they were being processed into the jail, other events were unfolding elsewhere. Deputies had been sent to Beaver Dam Road to investigate a trespass complaint. The caller told authorities that someone had come onto private property and abandoned a vehicle there.
The car was found partially submerged in water, with the tag missing.
Officers identified the owner of the vehicle as 77-year-old Arthur Gerald Anderson and went looking for him.
During the course of their search, his family members told investigators that they hadn’t seen him in a few days. Deputies found Anderson’s body a short time later at a location not far from where the vehicle had been found.
“Further investigation revealed Bowden and Rameriz murdered Anderson after he confronted them for entering a residence on West Juniper Avenue he was a caretaker of,” the press release stated. “The couple then attempted to burn the residence, stole Anderson’s vehicle, and dumped it later.”
In connection to the Anderson death, Ramirez and Bowden have each been charged with arson and an open count of murder.
Michael Bourgeois was sentenced to life in prison without the parole for the murders of his adoptive parents in 2001. According to documents Michael Bourgeois along with Landon May, Steven Estes and Drenea Rodriguez conspired to kill the couple. Landon May and Michael Bourgeois went to the home and tied the couple up then proceeded to torture them for house.
The female victim was shot, stabbed, had a television set dropped on her head and was finally suffocated. The male victim was shot, stabbed and strangled to death. The group was soon arrested and Landon May was sentenced to death. Steven Estes was sentenced to 17 to 35 years in prison, Drenea Rodriguez was sentenced to life and Michael Bourgeois who was seventeen years old was sentenced to life in prison. Due to changes in juvenile sentencing laws the teen killer was resentenced to eighty years in prison and will be eligible for parole when he reaches ninety seven years old
Michael Bourgeois 2023 Information
Parole Number:FG4843 Age: 36 Date of Birth: 04/14/1984 Race: ASIAN Height: 5′ 04″ Gender: MALE Citizenship: USA Complexion: LIGHT Current Location: MAHANOY
A prison inmate who was 17 years old when he tortured and killed his adoptive parents in Lancaster County has been re-sentenced, but he still won’t have a chance of parole unless he lives to the age of 97. Michael Bourgeois, now 33, will serve 80 years to life for the 2001 murders of Lucy and Terry Smith at their Ephrata home, the district attorney’s office said.
Bourgeois, who was previously serving consecutive life terms, was in court for re-sentencing Friday because of a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that said mandatory life sentences for juveniles are cruel and unusual punishment. Bourgeois and a co-defendant, Landon May, bound and beat the Smiths in their home for hours before shooting them to death.
In a 2002 interview with prosecutors, Bourgeois said he killed his parents because he “wanted to get rid of them.” Lucy Smith was a principal at Elizabeth Martin Elementary in the School District of Lancaster. The district attorney’s office said Bourgeois testified for about an hour on Friday, saying he didn’t know right from wrong and was “coerced” by May and others he was hanging with around at the time.
On cross-examination, he admitted he knew killing someone and committing other crimes were wrong. Judge David Ashworth, while ordering the sentence, said he considered Bourgeois’ age but also his “chilling, depraved and heinous acts.” Bourgeois will get credit for the prison time he’s served. The district attorney’s office said he wouldn’t be eligible for a parole hearing for about 64 years.
Michael Bourgeois More News
A Lancaster County man who was 17 when he participated in the torture-murders of his adoptive mother and stepfather had his 80-year-to-life prison sentence upheld Friday by a state appeals court.
The Superior Court panel rejected Michael Lee Bourgeois’ claim that county Judge David Ashworth didn’t fully consider his “distinct youthful attributes” when he resentenced Bourgeois in October 2017.
Bourgeois initially was sentenced to life in prison for the September 2001 slayings of Terry and Lucy Smith in the family’s home. He pleaded guilty to two counts of first-degree murder. His co-defendant, Landon May, was convicted by a jury and receive two death sentences.
Bourgeois had to be resentenced because of a 2012 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that bans automatic life without parole sentences for juvenile killers.
In the state court opinion denying Bourgeois’ appeal, Judge Carolyn H. Nichols noted that prosecutors wanted Ashworth to resentence Bourgeois to 100 years-to-life behind bars. She rejected Bourgeois’ argument Ashworth imposed an illegal de facto life prison term.
Nichols cited Ashworth’s observation that each of the murders “was carried out in a dispassionate and calculated manner, each victim was tortured and mutilated, and each murder showed an exceptionally callous disregard for human suffering.”
A forensic pathologist concluded Terry Smith had been stabbed 47 times, his neck was slashed at least five times, he was shot five times and then was asphyxiated. Lucy Smith was cut 51 times, was shot in the head, was beaten with a hammer and was finally smothered, the pathologist concluded.
Terry Smith was the president of a local company. Lucy Smith was an elementary school principal.
Bourgeois turns 35 next week. In his failed appeal he complained that Ashworth’s sentence will prevent him from becoming eligible for parole until he’s 97. That, he said, is nearly 20 years past the average life expectancy for a man in Pennsylvania.
An inmate at Lancaster County Prison already serving consecutive life terms for murdering his adoptive parents in 2001 had his sentence changed to 80 years to life Friday at a re-sentencing hearing in Lancaster County Court.
According to the Lancaster County District Attorney’s Office, Michael Bourgeois, 33, had a new sentence issued by Lancaster County Judge David Ashworth. He was back in court for re-sentencing due to the 2012 U.S. Supreme Court decision that declared life sentences against juveniles unconstitutional.
Bourgeois was 17 years old when he killed his adoptive parents, Lucy and Terry Smith, in their Ephrata home.
Judge Ashworth, while ordering sentence, said he considered Bourgeois’ age at the time of the crimes – about 17 ½ years – but said Bourgeois’ “chilling, depraved and heinous acts” must also be considered.
“Youth matters,” Judge Ashworth said, “but so do the lives of the victims.”
Bourgeois and a co-defendant, Landon May, tortured the Smiths for hours inside their Sand Court home before they died.
Bourgeois testified for about an hour Friday, saying he did not know right from wrong and was “coerced” into committing the crimes by May and other individuals he was hanging around at the time.
Assistant District Attorney Travis S. Anderson, on cross examination, revealed that was not the truth.
Anderson’s questioning prompted Bourgeois to admit he knew killing someone and committing other crimes were wrong.
Bourgeois told police after the murders, as Anderson pointed out, the murder plot was his idea.
“I decided I wanted to get rid of them,” Bourgeois told police in a 2002 interview.
Anderson took Bourgeois through the grisly torture and killings, at one point asking Bourgeois which side of a hammer he used to bludgeon his mother.
“Both,” Bourgeois said, looking down.
What happened when Lucy Smith begged for her life? Anderson asked Bourgeois.
“I still ended up killing her,” Bourgeois replied.
Anderson called Lancaster County District Attorney Craig Stedman to testify. Stedman, as assistant district attorney then, prosecuted Bourgeois and May, and conducted that 2002 interview with Bourgeois.
Of that interview, Stedman described Bourgeois’ demeanor as “flat” and “cold.”
“It stood out to me and stands out to me to this day,” Stedman testified, saying Bourgeois described the crimes matter-of-factly, as if recollecting a commute to work.
Stedman called the crimes’ impact on Lancaster County as “monumental.”
“It terrorized the community,” Stedman testified. “To this day I feel the emotions. It rocked Lancaster County.”
Bourgeois will get credit for the prison time he has served, meaning he would likely get a parole hearing in about 64 years.
Willie Bosket was fifteen when he murdered a man in a New York subway which would lead to changes on how juveniles are tried for murder. According to court documents Willie Bosket murdered the first man in the subway during a robbery and would murder another man eight days later.
Willie Bosket would plead guilty to both murders and would be sentenced to five years in prison which was the maximum at the time. Due to the short sentence many people were upset which led to a law change where juveniles as young as thirteen years old could be tried as an adult.
A year after he was sentenced Willie Bosket would escape from custody and when he was arrested he was charged as an adult for an assault that took place during the 100 days he was on the run and sentenced to an additional seven years in prison. Over the decades since this teen killer would assault a number of correctional guards and inmates and picked up sentences which would push his release date til 2062.
Willie Bosket 2023 Information
DIN (Department Identification Number)
84A6391
Inmate Name
BOSKET, WILLIE
Sex
MALE
Date of Birth
12/09/1962
Race / Ethnicity
BLACK
Custody Status
IN CUSTODY
Housing / Releasing Facility
FIVE POINTS
Date Received (Original)
10/23/1984
Date Received (Current)
09/17/1986
Admission Type
RETURN FROM ANOTHER AGENCY
County of Commitment
NEW YORK
Willie Bosket Other News
He is one of New York’s most isolated prisoners, spending 23 hours a day for the past two decades in a 9-by-6-foot cell. The only trimmings are a cot and a sink-toilet combination. His visitors — few as they are — must wedge into a nook outside his cell and speak to him through a 1-by-3-foot window of foggy plexiglass and iron bars.
In this static existence, Willie Bosket, 45, seems to have gone from defiant menace to subdued and empty inmate.
It was 30 years ago this month that a state law took effect allowing juveniles to be tried as adults, largely in response to Mr. Bosket’s slaying of two people on a New York subway when he was 15. He served only five years in jail for that crime because he was a juvenile, sparking public outrage. But shortly after completing his sentence, Mr. Bosket was arrested for assaulting a 72-year-old man.
He once claimed to be at “war” with prison officials. He said he laughed at the system and claimed to have committed more than 2,000 crimes as a child. He set fire to his cell and attacked guards. Mr. Bosket was sentenced to 25 years to life for stabbing a guard in the visitors’ room in 1988, along with other offenses, leading prison authorities to make him virtually the most restricted inmate in the state.
Now Mr. Bosket, who has gone 14 years without a disciplinary violation, does mainly three things: read, sleep and think.
“Just blank” is how Mr. Bosket described his existence during a recent interview at Woodbourne Correctional Facility, about 75 miles north of Manhattan. “Everything is the same every day. This is hell. Always has been.”
He is scheduled to remain isolated from the general prison population until 2046.
Mr. Bosket’s seclusion is part of a bigger debate over the confinement of troublesome inmates and the role of the prison system. Some say that Mr. Bosket’s level of seclusion is draconian, that he should be given an opportunity to rejoin the general population.
“He is a very dangerous person; he’s killed people,” said Jo Allison Henn, a lawyer who helped represent Mr. Bosket roughly 20 years ago when he fought unsuccessfully to have some of his restrictions removed. “I’m not saying he should be released from custody entirely, just the custody that he is in. It is beyond inhumane. I don’t think that too many civilized countries do that.”
But proponents of Mr. Bosket’s restrictions say he has proved to be something of an incorrigible danger to prison guards and other inmates and cannot be trusted in the general population. He is evaluated periodically, meaning he could rejoin the general prison population before 2046, said Erik Kriss, a spokesman for the State Department of Correctional Services.
“This guy was violent or threatening violence practically every day,” Mr. Kriss said. “Granted, it has been a while, but there are consequences for being violent in prison. We have zero tolerance for that.”
From 1985 to 1994, Mr. Bosket was written up nearly 250 times for disciplinary violations that included spitting on guards, throwing food and swallowing the handle of a spoon, according to prison reports.
Few, if any, of the state’s current inmates have been in disciplinary housing longer than Mr. Bosket, said Linda Foglia, a spokeswoman for the corrections department.
Willie Bosket Other News
Willie Bosket, a self-proclaimed ”monster” whose five-year sentence for two subway murders when he was 15 years old led New York to toughen its juvenile criminal laws, will be sentenced this morning for his latest crime, stabbing a prison guard.
”I laugh at this system because there ain’t a damn thing that it can do to me except to deal with the monster it has created,” Mr. Bosket said last February when he acted as his own lawyer in the assault trial.
Mr. Bosket, who once admitted to commiting more than 2,000 crimes between the ages of 9 and 15, including 25 stabbings, could be sentenced to 25 years to life in prison for the attack, which occured while he was being interviewed by a journalist helping write his autobiography. The 26-year-old Mr. Bosket is already serving 28 years to life for assault and arson unconnected to his original murder conviction. State’s Most Violent Inmate
Because he is widely considered the most violent inmate in New York, Mr. Bosket is confined in a specially designed cell stripped of everything, including its lighting fixtures, to prevent him from swallowing them, as he has in the past. To increase his isolation, not even his guards may speak to him.
”The only noise Willie Bosket is going to hear is the sound of his toilet flushing,” said Thomas A. Coughlin 3d, the commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services.
But Mr. Bosket’s tale of crime and punishment raises troublesome questions about the criminal-justice system, human nature and the family.
Did the courts and juvenile authorities really help create the monster in Mr. Bosket, as he asserts? Or did his rage and penchant for violence stem from his upbringing on West 114th Street in Harlem? Or, as Mr. Bosket himself has often suggested, was he destined to follow the path of a father he never met who had an uncannily similar early life of crime?
Mr. Bosket’s supporters say the system is at least partly to blame. He was first put in a reform school at age 9 at his mother’s request. Since then, despite repeated escapes, he has been free a total of about 18 months.
In a 1981 deposition, Mr. Bosket said he went to reform school as a truant, but ”left with the knowledge of purse snatching and mugging and subconsciously, murder.”
Sylvia Honig, a social worker who first met him when he was 12, said reformatories let him conduct a reign of terror: attacking staff members with clubs, smashing windows, stealing, sodomizing other inmates, escaping in state vehicles.
”After a while, he got the impression he was omnipotent,” said Miss Honig, who became his closest friend, Andrew Cooper, the publisher of the black-owned City Sun weekly newspaper, which has just run a three-part series on Mr. Bosket, sees a broader problem. ”I’m not going to tell you Willie Bosket is a hero, but this case raises the issue of racism in my mind,” he said.”Since he was black, did the system ever identify him as a person worth saving?” Parallels With Father Same Reformatory At the Same Age
Mr. Bosket himself often ponders the eerie parallels in his life to that of his father, William James Bosket Sr. By a stunning coincidence, the elder Bosket was sentenced to the same reform school at age 9, the Wiltwyck School for Boys in Yorktown. Both father and son’s schooling stopped at third grade, but both are described by acquaintances as bright, witty and charming.
Willie Bosket’s mother, Laura, was preganant with Willie when his father was arrested for a double murder at the age of 20. His father later escaped, robbed a bank and made the F.B.I.’s most-wanted list before being caught and sentenced to the Federal penetentiary at Leavenworth, Kan.
But there he transformed himself into a ”well-disciplined, rational human being,” he once told Jet magazine. He became a computer programmer and used his income from operating the prison’s computers to attend the University of Kansas.
In 1980 he graduated with an almost straight A average, the first prisoner ever elected Phi Beta Kappa.
He was released in 1983 but then, after getting a good job in an aerospace company, was rearrested on charges of molesting his girlfriend’s daughter. His girlfriend disguised herself as a nurse, smuggled him a revolver and helped him escape before they were caught in a police shootout near Milwaukee.
As his last act, on March 7, 1985, he used his two remaining bullets to kill his companion and himself.
”Willie often wondered if there was some hereditary connection with his father,” said Matthew Worth, a reporter for the Utica Observer Dispatch. At Mr. Bosket’s suggestion, Mr. Worth had been interviewing him in Shawangunk prison for a year, when one day last April Mr. Bosket suddenly took out a homemade knife and stabbed the visitors room guard in the chest, ”It was so random, so senseless and stupid,” said Mr. Worth, who was too discouraged to continue writing the book.”He didn’t even know the guard.”
”We had made an agreement that he wouldn’t do anything to undermine the book, and then he betrayed me,” said Mr. Worth, who then testified against Mr. Bosket. ‘Legendizing Himself’ With No Way Out, He Blames Prisons
Donald Williams, the Ulster County assistant District Attorney who tried the case, feels the stabbing ”was just another attempt to gain attention.”
”He knows he’ll never get out of prison, so he’s attempting to legendize himself,” he said.
This explains Mr. Bosket’s strategy at the trial, Mr. Williams suggested, in which Mr. Bosket admitted in his opening statement that he had stabbed the guard, Earl Porter.
”I am telling you that the only regret Willie Bosket has is not killing Earl Porter,” he told the jury.
”I am going to show you why and I am going to show you why Willie Bosket is coming to hate this system.”
Mr. Williams and prison officials wonder what the system can do with a prisoner like Mr. Bosket who continues to commit crimes in jail? Mr. Bosket does not look dangerous – slightly built at 5 feet 9 inches and 150 pounds, he has a handsome, dimpled face.
But, according to one presentencing report, since 1984 Mr. Bosket has set fire to his cell seven times, attacked his guards nine times, and attempted several escapes.
After he set his cell afire in 1986 and assaulted a guard who came in to put out the blaze, he was found guilty of being a ”persistent felon.”
Normally, for the fire and assault, he would have received 3 1/2 to 7 years. But as a persistent felon, he got 25 to life.
There was irony in this, said James B. Flateau, a spokesman for the Department of Correctional Services. Mr. Bosket came back into the prison system in 1984 with a sentence of 3 1/2 to 7 years for mugging a half-blind 72-year-old man in Harlem. But because of his conduct in prison, he may now face a total of 53 years to life.
Mr. Bosket could not be interviewed for this story. He is being held in solitary confinement for the next 20 years. Uncontrolled Youth ‘He’s a Bad Man, You’re Like Him’
Those who know him believe Willie Bosket’s troubles started as a young boy in Harlem with a loving but passive mother but knowing almost nothing about his absent father.
”He used to ask, ‘Who is my father?”’ Miss Honig said. ”His mother and grandmother would say, ‘He’s a bad man, and you’re just like him.’ ”
In third grade at P.S. 207 his teacher was unable to control him, according to his own handwritten account at 13.
”Willie was having problems in school like pulling fire alarms and fighting with the students and the teachers and stealing school books and materials like colored paper,” he recounted in a bold, clear hand.
”Because the school thought Willie was krazy” he wrote, ”Willie was sent to Bellvue State Hospital for mental people.”
It was the first of several visits to Bellevue, where he threatened to set fire to the ward, had to be disarmed by hospital guards and threatened to kill a psychiatrist.
In 1973, at his mother’s request he was sent to a reformatory.
Miss Honig met him the next year as he was being transferred. ”I asked him what he was in for, and he said, ‘Stabbing people.’ ” ”Why did you do that?” ”Because they made me mad.”
A psychological test given Willie at Wiltwyck found him ”precocious, warm and empathetic.” But it warned that he needed support from adults ”in order to reach his above-average intellectual and creative potential.”
Instead, in 1974, a judge sent him to the Brookwood Center For Boys, a maximum security institution, where other inmates were in for murder, rape and armed robbery.
His years at Brookwood from 1974 to 1977, were critical for young Willie, Miss Honig believes. ”Because he was hardly ever disciplined, he became more assaultive and aggressive.”
In a diary she kept, she recorded how Willie was allowed to go into town with female staff members and get drunk, how he was permitted not to attend classes, how he hit another boy with a poker in the eye, how he sodomized another in the shower, how he stole cigarettes from a vending machine and sold them and how he drove a truck into a social worker.
Nonetheless, in 1977, at age 14, the school released him, sending him to a group home in Brooklyn and a job as a maintenance worker.
John Dieters, the supervisor of his wing at Brookwood, told Miss Honig: ”One of these days Willie is going to kill somebody.” Political Figure A Boy’s Killings Change State Law
Willie soon soon ran away to his family’s apartment in Harlem.
”They should have arrested him immediately,” Miss Honig said.
Instead Willie and a cousin, Herman Spates, began roaming the Seventh Avenue IRT subway line looking for drunks to rob.
On March 19, 1978, when one awoke as Willie was going through his pockets, he shot him in the temple with a .22-caliber pistol. Eight days later, he shot and killed another.
Asked how he felt, Mr. Bosket told the police, ”I shot people, that’s all. I don’t feel nothing.”
In June 1978 he was sentenced to five years in the custody of the Division for Youth, the maximum sentence under state law at the time.
But an angry outcry soon led Governor Hugh Carey to win passage of a new law letting juvenile offenders be tried as adults for murder.
At a Goshen youth facility, Mr. Bosket bashed two guards in the head with a mop handle and temporarily escaped.
His deepening anger showed in a letter to Miss Honig on May 26, 1982:
”I have now mentally prepared myself and have accepted the fact that I will be in prison for the rest of my life.
”I ridded myself of the sadistic killer in me because I knew it was wrong to be in me. But now it has come back, not because I wanted it to, but because the system forced it back.”
In December 1983, a few days after his 21st birthday, he was released.
On March 19, 1984, he was arrested for attempted robbery.
While at Goshen, Mr. Bosket learned about his father and began a writing to him at Leavenworth.
His father, by now a college graduate in prison, worried that Mr. Bosket was enamored with the revolutionary rhetoric of George Jackson, a former leader of the Black Panther Party who died during a controversial escape attempt from San Quentin in 1971.
”In your letter you seem taken with the ideas and writings of George Jackson most, and the need for confrontation with societal forces at large at some level of ‘revolutionary suicide.’ ” the elder Bosket wrote back.
”Frankly, that’s a bit too much excitement for me, and it has been my observation that the energies from such a thought basis tend to dissipate unfruitfully before the onrush of hard pragmatic realities. But then, I’m just old folks.”
Since then, Mr. Bosket has attacked one guard after another.
Even Miss Honig has stopped visiting him. ”I couldn’t go anymore,” she said. ”He’s living like an animal. The more they treat him like a monster, the more monstrous he becomes.”
The only lights are outside his cell door, which is covered with plexiglass to keep him from throwing feces or food. Video cameras focus on him.
He is allowed outside in a private area for one hour of exercise a day. But before he can come out of his cell, he must stick his arms and feet out to be manacled.
”He’s getting mad again,” said Miss Honig. ”I know it’s just a matter of time before he tries to kill someone or kill himself. He has told me, ‘If they kill me, then I can rest forever.’ ”
Retired state prison guard Earl Porter is nearing an anniversary he’d like to forget, but can’t and never will.
Thirty years ago, on April 16, 1988, one of New York’s most notorious inmates plunged a 10-inch shank into Porter’s chest, narrowly missing his heart.
However, his life still hung in the balance as paramedics worked frantically to counteract a collapsed lung filling with blood, as Porter was rushed to a hospital for emergency surgery.
“I remember them saying, ‘We’ve barely got a pulse,” the 62-year-old Greenfield resident said. “We don’t think he’s going to make it.”
The incident occurred at maximum-security Shawangunk Correctional Facility in Wallkill, where Porter worked a year after beginning his career as a state corrections officer. His assailant was Willie Bosket, Jr., then 25, whose extremely violent criminal record had prompted a change in state law, enabling juveniles as young as 13 to face the same murder charges and penalties as adults.
Bosket, now serving an 82 years-to-life sentence at Five Points Correctional Facility in Romulus, Seneca County, has been in prison or reformatories for all but 18 months since 1971, and has spent all but 100 days of his adult life in custody.
Forty years ago, on March 19, 1978, a then 15-year-old Bosket shot and killed a New York City subway passenger, and murdered another in similar fashion eight days later, during attempted robberies. As a youthful offender, he was sentenced to five years, the maximum allowed at the time.
Gov. Hugh Carey, running for re-election, had opposed efforts to have juveniles tried as adults for some crimes. But public outcry was so great over Bosket’s short sentence that Carey called the Legislature into special session to approve the Juvenile Offender Act of 1978.
Bosket escaped from a youth detention facility, was captured and over the next several years committed a long series of violent assaults, some against corrections officers, after being sent to state prison.
Porter wasn’t specifically targeted when Bosket stabbed him in a prison visiting room area. He was simply the latest victim of the inmate’s rage against authority and society-at-large.
“Wrong place, wrong time,” said Porter’s daughter, Kristy Roberts, who was 6 years old at the time.
Earl, a 1974 Ballston Spa High School graduate, and his wife, Marlene, were living in Greenfield, but he stayed with a sister, who lived near Wallkill, during the week and would travel home on weekends.
When the incident occurred, state troopers and prison officials from Mount McGregor Correctional Facility, in Wilton, were sent to locate Marlene and tell her what happened. She was just up the road, visiting her mother, with Kristy.
Prison officials stopped at Mom & Pop’s Store in Porter Corners, hoping to find Marlene. Being the small close-knit community it is, the store’s owners knew where she likely was.
“A corrections vehicle pulled up and the man said, ‘There’s been an accident and your husband’s in the hospital. It’s not looking good,’” Marlene said. “I was stunned. I just threw clothes in a bag, took my daughter and off we went.”
Porter had been taken to St. Luke’s Cornwall Hospital in Newburgh, where he was in intensive care following surgery.
“It’s etched in my mind,” said Roberts, now 36. “I remember seeing him in his room with the chest tube pumping blood out of his lungs.”
Porter was released several days later, relatively quickly, considering how close he’d come to dying.
After recovering at home, Porter was reassigned to medium-security Mount McGregor where he worked for 25 years before retiring on Sept. 30, 2013, less than a year before the site closed under Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s statewide prison scaledown program.
“I really didn’t want him to go back,” Marlene said.
During his 1989 trial for stabbing Porter, Bosket described himself as a “monster” and according to Porter said, “The only thing I regret is that I didn’t kill him.” Bosket’s father was serving a life sentence for murder, and when he was still a youthful offender Bosket said that he would some day kill someone, too.
For attacking Porter, who testified during the trial, Bosket was convicted of first-degree attempted murder, first-degree assault, third-degree criminal possession of a weapon and first-degree promotion of prison contraband.
He was given a life sentence and based upon his extremely violent conduct he’s been in “the box,” solitary confinement, since 1989 — allowed to leave his cell one hour per day for exercise.
Originally, Bosket was expected to stay in solitary until 2046 when he would be 84 years old. But this was reduced recently based on improved behavior. Prison officials review his status regularly, to determine if he should be allowed to join the general inmate population.
Looking back, Porter believes another inmate put the weapon Bosket used in an overhead bathroom light fixture. Bosket retrieved it after being interviewed by a journalist and managed to slip by an officer stationed at a frisk area before attacking Porter, who was seated at a desk.
“He was in solitary back then, too,” Porter said. “He shouldn’t have been in a regular visiting room area.”
It was by far the most severe altercation Porter suffered during his career, but not the only one. At Mount McGregor, an inmate once head-butted him.
Porter will never know why fate linked him to one of America’s most violent felons, prompting a case that generated nationwide media attention.
New York was the first-ever state to adopt a law such as the Juvenile Offender Act of 1978. Since then, every other state has followed suit.
These days, at 62, Porter spends his time “just catching up on projects, doing things I didn’t have time to do when I was working. I miss the people that I worked with, but I don’t miss the job.”
The upcoming 30th anniversary of his brush with death is bittersweet. He’s glad to be alive, that he and Marlene had another child — their son, Justin — along with countless other blessings. But in some respects he’s also a prisoner of horrific memories, which like victims of all violent crimes, he’ll never escape from.
“I try not to think about it, but it never goes away,” Porter said. “It’s just planted there.”
Mathew Borges was fifteen years old when he murdered a classmate in a a brutal fashion. According to court documents Borges was upset that the victim spent time with his girlfriend so he would lure the other teenager to a remote location where he was stabbed over seventy times. Mathew would then cut off the head of the victim along with his hands so he would be harder to identify. This teen killer would be sentenced to two life sentences with no parole.
Mathew Borges 2023 Information
Mathew Borges – Current Facility – Old Colony Correctional Center (Medium Security)
Mathew Borges Other News
A teenager was found guilty of stabbing his 16-year-old classmate 76 times before cutting his head off. Mathew Borges, 18, was convicted of murdering Lee Manuel Viloria-Paulino, whose body was found on the Merrimack River in Lawrence, Massachusetts in December 2016. Authorities said Mathew Borges beheaded Viloria-Paulino and cut off his hands so he would not be identified. His head was found in a plastic bag near his body, although his hands were never located. Prosecutor Jay Gubitose said Mathew Borges, who was 15 when killed Viloria-Paulino, committed the heinous act of violence because he was jealous Viloria-Paulino had spent time with his girlfriend. According to Gubitose, there was a ‘mountain of evidence’ against Borges that includes text and messages with friends, as well as a notebook that planned the murder, CBS reported.
The prosecutor cited a text message that Mathew Borges sent, saying ‘This (text message) is to Stephanie, 24 hours before he kills Lee: “Take a good look at my eyes the next time we talk because that may be the last time you see them like that ever again.’ Gubitose continued: ‘She says “don’t say that, I don’t want to see your eyes dead.” (Borges replies) “No, don’t, it’s true. I know what I’m going to do and I can’t do anything about it. People will notice a big difference in me once my eyes turn dead.’”
Four teenagers testified that Mathew Borges lured Viloria-Paulino away from his home, down to the river to smoke weed, on November 18, 2016 so they could steal clothes and a Playstation from his home. After the burglary, the teen claimed Borges called them and said, on speaker phone, that he had killed Viloria-Paulino, according to MassLive. Borges’ attorney, Ed Hayden, dismissed both the theory that his client killed out of jealousy, as well as the teens’ testimony about the robbery.
He said: ‘Mathew Borges is their “stay our of jail” card and they play it masterfully…none of these kids went to the river to see if a body was there? That’s not believable.’ Hayden questioned the prosecutors case, citing a lack of evidence against Mathew Borges, saying ‘There is no crime scene. There is no scene where the body was dismembered. There is no murder weapon, no tool used to dismember the body, no DNA, no blood, no fingerprints and there is no motive.’
Gubitose called Hayden’s questions ‘distractions’ and said: ‘Every piece of evidence points to him. Maybe it’s hard to believe a 15-year-old kid can kill someone, but that’s the world we lived…He’s the only one. He killed Lee.’ On Tuesday, a jury delivered their guilty verdict after deliberating for approximately nine hours in Salem Superior Court. Mathew Borges faces 25 to 30 years in prison with a possibility for parole in 25, years according to the Essex County District Attorney’s Office. He is set to be sentenced on July 9, according to the Eagle Tribune.
Mathew Borges Videos
Mathew Borges More News
The Lawrence High School student who beheaded his classmate in 2016 and left his decapitated body near the Merrimack River, was sentenced to 30 years to life in Salem Superior Court on Tuesday for each of his charges.
Mathew Borges, 18, was found guilty of first-degree murder with premeditation and extreme cruelty and atrocity following his 10 day murder trial in April and May. Borges was sentenced to 30 years to life for each charge, to be served concurrently. He will be eligible for parole on both charges after 30 years.
Though Borges was 15 when he killed Lee Manuel Viloria-Paulino he was tried as an adult.
Prosecutors relied heavily on social media and text conversations as they presented their case against Borges. The defense did not call any witnesses and Borges did not testify on his own behalf.
Borges and a group of friends reportedly planned to rob Viloria-Paulino the day he went missing. He was to take the 16-year-old to the Merrimack River to smoke weed while friends stole Viloria-Paulino’s PlayStation, clothes, belts and other items, Borges’ friends testified during the trial.
“He said he stabbed him” and cut off his head “so he wouldn’t be caught,” Jonathan Miranda, 18, testified, according to The Eagle Tribune.
A motive for the slaying has never been identified.
During the trial, Ed Hayden, who represented Borges, pointed to a lack of physical evidence. He said though the Borges and Viloria-Paulino families deserved the truth, they did not get it during trial.
“There were too many witnesses who lied, there are too many unanswered questions and there is too little evidence,” Hayden said in his closing arguments. “There is no crime scene. There is no scene where the body was dismembered. There is no murder weapon, no tool used to dismember the body, no DNA, no blood, no fingerprints and there is no motive.”
All of the teenagers called to testify said Borges and Viloria-Paulino were friendly. But two of Borges’ ex-girlfriends spoke about his jealousy.
Leilany DeJesus, who dated Borges during their freshman year of high school, told the court that after she and Borges broke up he asked if she was sleeping with other boys at school. He mentioned Viloria-Paulino by name, she said.
Stephanie Soriano, who also dated Borges, testified that he got angry at her for saying hello to Viloria-Paulino at school.
Borges sent Soriano a message saying she was his and he would kill anyone “who get in way of me getting what I want.”
In other conversations with Soriano, Borges spoke about demons.
“I think of killing someone and I smirk. It’s all I think about every day but I control myself. I see people I don’t like [and] that comes to mind. I’m going insane,” he wrote in one message.
On Nov. 17 2016, a day before Borges killed Viloria-Paulino, he asked Soriano if his eyes looked dead.
“Eyes that are dead are scary…makes you think about what that person has done. What they’ve been through. What they’ve seen. Eyes that don’t shine, that are full of darkness,” Borges said in the recording. “It’s just sad. It’s like these people are different. They’ve done things that make them lose their humanity. Like they have no soul, they just have big black pupils,” Borges said in a voice message sent to Soriano
He told Soriano to look carefully at his eyes the next time she saw him.
He would have dead eyes soon, too, he said
Mathew Borges Other News
A Massachusetts teenager convicted of fatally stabbing and then decapitating a high school classmate has been sentenced to life in prison.
Mathew Borges, 18, of Lawrence, will be eligible for parole in 30 years under the maximum allowable sentence handed down on Tuesday by Superior Court Judge Helene Kanzajian.
A jury convicted Borges in May of first-degree murder in the November 2016 killing of 16-year-old Lee Manuel Viloria-Paulino. Viloria-Paulino’s decapitated body and head were found along the banks of a river by a dog walker.
Prosecutors say Borges was jealous the victim had spent time with a girl he liked.
Under Massachusetts law, a first-degree murder conviction carries a life sentence without the possibility of parole for adults. But parole eligibility must be added if the crime was committed as a juvenile.
Zachary Blanchard was sixteen years old when he fatally shot his father in Tennessee. According to prosecutors Zachary Blanchard would ask his father with help with a chicken coop. When his father went outside the teen killer would go back into the home and grab a gun then return outside fatally shooting his father. No one is sure why. Zachary Blanchard was arrested and would eventually plead guilty to the murder of his father. He would be sentenced to thirty years in prison and must serve twenty five years before he can be released
A Greene County teen admits to killing his own father and there will never be a clear explanation. News 5’s Kristi O’Connor was in the courtroom as shocking details of the shooting were confirmed. Eighteen-year-old Zachary Blanchard will be behind bars until his 40’s. He pleaded guilty to second-degree murder as part of a plea deal with the state. He was originally charged with first-degree murder in the 2014 shooting death of his own father, Robert Blanchard. “It will never be closed, never. This is something I deal with daily,” Teresa O’Neil said.
She is the mother of Robert and grandmother of Zachary,O’Neil is still mourning the loss of her son, but has forgiven Zachary for taking his life. “I’ve made peace with that part, and I will be keeping up with him,” O’Neil said. Blanchard confirmed chilling details about what happened the night of April 2, 2014. It started when the then 16-year-old asked his father for help in their chicken coup. “He went back inside the house, washed his hands, retrieved his father’s .45 caliber pistol, went back to the chicken coup and shot his father,” Cecil Mills from the Greene County District Attorney’s Office said in court.
“They found Robert Blanchard, 37, laying in his chicken coup with a gunshot wound to the back of the head.” He admitted to taking his father’s credit cards, ammunition and guns, then texting three other juveniles he ran away with, it read “It is done.” The four teens ran from police before being caught in Newberry, South Carolina 2 days later. If the case went to trial, the state says Blanchard planned to claim his father was abusing him as part of his defense. “This defendant’s major defense would have been that he was being abused. He was trying to get away from emotional and or physical abuse,” Mills said in court. However, his family disagrees. “Never happened,” Teresa O’Neil said.
“Never happened. Robert was good to Zachary,” Robert’s Step-father Robert O’Neil said. When News 5’s Kristi O’Connor asked Teresa and Robert O’Neil why Zachary killed his father this was their responses:
“He wanted to go to the beach,” Teresea said.
“Peer pressure, kids putting peer pressure on him,” Robert said. Blanchard was sentenced to 30 years in prison, with the possibility of release on good behavior after 25 and a half years. The cases of the three other teens were handled in juvenile court.
An East Tennessee teen charged with killing his father has pleaded guilty to second-degree murder as jury selection was set to begin for his trial.
The Greeneville Sun ) reports 18-year-old Zachary Thomas Blanchard entered the plea Monday morning and was sentenced to 30 years in prison.
He and three other teens were arrested in 2014 in South Carolina after a 10-hour search. They had apparently planned to go to Myrtle Beach.
Blanchard, who was 16 at the time, was charged as an adult with first-degree murder in the shooting death of 36-year-old Robert J. Blanchard at their home in Greene County. Police say he took his father’s van, money, several guns and ammunition.
Police say the other teens joined him after the shooting. Their cases were handled in juvenile court.
Zachary Blanchard is currently incarcerated at the Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
Zachary Blanchard Release Date
Zachary Blanchard current release date is 2041
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.