Larry Estrada Texas Death Row

larry estrada texas

Larry Estrada was sentenced to death by the State of Texas for a murder committed during a robbery. According to court documents Larry Estrada and an accomplice would rob a convenience store where the two clerks were shot and one of the store clerks would die from his injuries. Larry Estrada would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Larry Estrada 2022 Information

SID Number:    05812216

TDCJ Number:    00999259

Name:    ESTRADA,LARRY EDGAR

Race:    H

Gender:    M

Age:    43

Maximum Sentence Date:    DEATH ROW       

Current Facility:    POLUNSKY

Projected Release Date:    DEATH ROW

Parole Eligibility Date:    DEATH ROW

Inmate Visitation Eligible:    NO

Larry Estrada More News

On 02/21/1997, in Houston, Larry Estrada and one co-defendant robbed a convenience store. During the robbery, one Arab male clerk was shot and killed. The other clerk was shot and assumed dead. Estrada and his co-defendant took the clerks’ wallets and more than $23,000 in cash from the store’s safe. The surviving clerk survived and was able to identify Estrada and his co-defendant

Joel Escobedo Texas Death Row

Joel Escobedo texas

Joel Escobedo was sentenced to death by the State of Texas for the murder of a man during a robbery. According to court documents Joel Escobedo would shoot and kill a man at a bus station. Joel Escobedo would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Joel Escobedo 2022 Information

SID Number:    02784683

TDCJ Number:    00999305

Name:    ESCOBEDO,JOEL

Race:    H

Gender:    M

Age:    59

Maximum Sentence Date:    DEATH ROW       

Current Facility:    POLUNSKY

Projected Release Date:    DEATH ROW

Parole Eligibility Date:    DEATH ROW

Inmate Visitation Eligible:    YES

Joel Escobedo More News

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has sent the case of a condemned killer back to his trial court in Houston to examine again claims the convicted man is mentally impaired and ineligible for execution.

A jury in 1999 convicted Joel Escobedo of capital murder for robbing and fatally shooting a 65-year-old man at a Houston bus stop in 1998.

The 50-year-old Joel Escobedo is among more than a dozen inmates who wound up on Texas death row after they were examined by psychologist George Denkowski. He’s been reprimanded by a state medical board for questionable evaluation methods in criminal cases.

The court’s ruling Wednesday allows Escobedo’s trial court to accept the original findings or determine new recommendations to be delivered to the appeals court within 90 days.

https://www.chron.com/news/article/Houston-killer-may-get-another-psychiatric-review-3424451.php

Gerald Eldridge Texas Death Row

Gerald Eldridge texas

Gerald Eldridge was sentenced to death by the State of Texas for the murder of a woman and her daughter. According to court documents Gerald Eldridge would shoot to death his former girlfriend and her nine year old daughter. Gerald Eldridge would also shoot a seven year old boy who would survive his injuries. Gerald Eldridge would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Gerald Eldridge 2022 Information

SID Number:    03525779

TDCJ Number:    00999108

Name:    ELDRIDGE,GERALD CORNELIUS

Race:    B

Gender:    M

Age:    57

Maximum Sentence Date:    DEATH ROW       

Current Facility:    POLUNSKY

Projected Release Date:    DEATH ROW

Parole Eligibility Date:    DEATH ROW

Inmate Visitation Eligible:    YES

Gerald Eldridge More News

A federal appeals court ruled Monday that a Houston man convicted of murdering his ex-girlfriend and 9-year-old daughter in 1993 has been feigning symptoms of mental illness to avoid execution.

The decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agrees with a 2013 ruling by a district court that there was extensive evidence Gerald Eldridge’s claims of incompetence were fraudulent.

Eldridge, 52, was sentenced to death in June 1994 after he murdered his former girlfriend, Cynthia Bogany, and her daughter, Chirissa, in January 1993. Eldridge also shot his 7-year-old son, Terrell, and Bogany’s boyfriend at the time, Wayne Dotson.

He narrowly escaped execution in 2009 when U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal halted the punishment two hours before his scheduled lethal injection in Huntsville. Eldridge’s lawyers argued at the time that Eldridge was too mentally ill to be executed.

Eldridge has told authorities he has seen spaceships, wrangled with a winged monster that kept people from getting into heaven and chatted with Bogany — the woman he murdered — during jailhouse visits, according to the Houston Chronicle.

At the hearing to determine the veracity of Eldridge’s claims of mental illness, the district court heard testimony from four mental-health experts. The experts said that while there was some evidence Eldridge was mentally ill, there was far more evidence that he had a greater understanding of reality than he was letting on.

Eldridge’s attorneys appealed the case, but with Monday’s ruling, Eldridge’s death sentence has been reaffirmed. His attorneys could now take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/courts/2016/08/30/texas-death-row-inmate-faked-mental-illness-to-avoid-execution-court-says/

Harvey Earvin Texas Death Row

Harvey Earvin

Harvey Earvin was sentenced to death by the State of Texas for a robbery and murder committed in 1976. According to court documents Harvey Earvin would rob a gas station where he would shoot and kill the clerk. Harvey Earvin would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death. Harvey Earvin has been on death row for over 44 years

Harvey Earvin 2022 Information

SID Number:    02181781

TDCJ Number:    00000577

Name:    EARVIN,HARVEY

Race:    B

Gender:    M

Age:    63

Maximum Sentence Date:    DEATH ROW       

Current Facility:    POLUNSKY

Projected Release Date:    DEATH ROW

Parole Eligibility Date:    DEATH ROW

Inmate Visitation Eligible:    YES

Harvey Earvin More News

A jury convicted Harvey Earvin of capital murder on August 25, 1977, and sentenced him to death. After exhausting his appeals in the state court, he petitioned the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas for a writ of habeas corpus which was denied on September 3, 1987. He then appealed to this Court. On appeal, he claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel during the punishment stage of his trial. Upon a review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the district court’s denial of the writ of habeas corpus.

The body of Ertis Brock was discovered on the evening of December 7, 1976. He had been shot once in the chest with a shotgun. Within days, Harvey Earvin, along with two others, was arrested in connection with the murder. Harvey Earvin subsequently made a written confession, stating that he shot Brock while attempting to rob him.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/860/623/466010/

Harvey Earvin Other News

hortly before dark on December 7, 1976, appellant and his girl friend, 15-year-old Feleca Farrell, went to the rear of a filling station on Raguet Street in Lufkin for the purpose of robbing the attendant of the cash he had collected during the day. Appellant had used cosmetic makeup in painting a mustache on his face and was wearing an Afro-type wig. He was carrying a single-barrel twenty-gauge shotgun.

As he and his companion approached the filling station from the rear, they observed the deceased, Ertis Brock, going toward his car parked nearby carrying a bank bag and some papers. Appellant got very close to him and told Brock to “Hold it, mother fucker”, at which time, according to Farrell, the deceased reached into his back pocket, whereupon appellant shot him in the chest. Appellant and Farrell then ran from the scene, neither taking the money, and appellant dropped the gun some distance from the scene of the murder.

Both parties were apprehended within a few days and each confessed to the details of the crime, and appellant’s confession comes to us without challenge. The State made out its case by the testimony of Farrell and Bill Mickens with whom appellant had planned the robbery several days earlier. Mickens drove appellant and Farrell from the Congo Club to a point near the filling station where Brock was killed. Appellant did not testify nor did he offer any evidence in his own behalf upon the guilt-innocence stage of the trial.1

https://www.anylaw.com/case/harvey-earvin-v-state-texas/court-of-criminal-appeals-of-texas/01-09-1979/DMlMYGYBTlTomsSBY8BK

Reinaldo Dennes Texas Death Row

Reinaldo Dennes texas

Reinaldo Dennes was sentenced to death by the State of Texas for a murder following a robbery. According to court documents Reinaldo Dennes had just pulled off an elaborate jewel heist where he obtained over four million dollars and was leaving the building when he would shoot and kill a security guard who blocked his path. Reinaldo Dennes would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Reinaldo Dennes 2022 Information

SID Number:    05608248

TDCJ Number:    00999248

Name:    DENNES,REINALDO

Race:    H

Gender:    M

Age:    65

Maximum Sentence Date:    DEATH ROW       

Current Facility:    POLUNSKY

Projected Release Date:    DEATH ROW

Parole Eligibility Date:    DEATH ROW

Inmate Visitation Eligible:    YES

Reinaldo Dennes More News

In December of 1995, Antonio Ramirez came from Ecuador to work in Texas. Shortly after his arrival, Ramirez met a man named Francisco Rojas who sold jewelry for [Dennes].1 Some time later, Ramirez gave several rings to Rojas that he wanted to sell. Rojas then took Ramirez and the rings to [Dennes] at [Dennes]’s office in the Greenrich Building on Richmond Avenue. During this visit, Ramirez noticed a lathe in [Dennes]’s jewelry workshop and began to play with it. [Dennes] asked Ramirez if he knew how to operate the machine and Ramirez said that he did. [Dennis] then hired Ramirez to make watch bezels for him.

2 Shortly thereafter [Reinaldo Dennes] invited Ramirez to travel to Mexico with him to buy a diamond. After the diamond purchase, the pair returned to Texas and [Dennes] gave Ramirez more work. In early January 1996, [Dennes] made a sketch for Ramirez and asked him if he could make the object depicted. By the time he completed the job, Ramirez had manufactured what turned out to be a silencer for [Dennes]. After the silencer was completed, [Dennes], his brother Alberto, and Ramirez went to a field a few minutes away to test it. Thinking the silencer did not work as it should [Dennes] modified his design and had Ramirez make another one. [Dennes] test fired this model in his office.Shortly after the completion of the second silencer, [Dennes] asked Ramirez to help him and Alberto rob a jewelry dealer who also had an office in the Greenrich Building. [Reinaldo Dennes] explained that he would take the videotape from the security station while Ramirez secured the diamonds and Alberto shot the dealer. Ramirez consented, but returned to South America two days later.

3 Estrella Martinez, [Dennes]’s lover, had a cleaning job at the Greenrich Building. In January of 1996, [Dennes] told Martinez he wanted her to let him in a side door of the building after working hours. He told her he was going to take some videotapes from the security guard’s station on the first floor. On January 22, 1996, [Dennes] gave Martinez a cellular phone with which he planned to call her to tell her when to let him and Alberto into the building. [Dennes] also wanted Martinez to distract the guard so he could take the tapes.Janos Szucs was a reputable wholesale diamond dealer who had an office in the Greenrich Building. Shortly before his death, Szucs had a diamond inventory worth more than $3,600,000 which he kept in his office safe. He also had approximately $200,000 in cash that he planned to use to purchase diamonds on an upcoming trip. Szucs did not have a receptionist or secretary; access to his office was controlled through an electronically-locked door. Szucs had a television monitor in his office so he could see who was at the door and he would allow people in by pushing a remote button located on his desk.

In early January 1996, Szucs and Sam Solomay formed a partnership and Solomay moved into Szucs’s office suite.On January 24th, Solomay left the office at 5:40 p.m., but Szucs remained, explaining that he had an appointment that evening. David Copeland was the security guard on duty at the Greenrich Building that evening, working the 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift. A videotape recorder at the security desk recorded the images from the security cameras around the building. When Copeland arrived for his shift, a technician was there working on the surveillance system.Around 6:30 p.m. that same evening, [Dennes] called Martinez on the cellular phone he had provided her and told her to open the loading dock door. [Dennes] and Alberto entered and immediately turned into a stairwell, thereby avoiding the security guard’s desk. Shortly after 7:00 p.m. [Dennes] called Martinez and told her to distract the security guard. Martinez told Copeland that she had locked her keys in a fifth floor office and asked him to help her retrieve them.

A little after 7:30 p.m., [Dennes] again called Martinez and told her that he needed another distraction. The security guard kept the key to the snack bar so Martinez approached Copeland and told him that she needed to clean the area and asked if he would let her in. Shortly after Martinez began cleaning, however, the owner of the snack bar arrived and told her to come back later.When Copeland returned to the lobby, he found a man kneeling behind the security desk apparently working on the security system. Copeland assumed this was related to the earlier repairs. As Copeland approached, the man scrambled to his feet and walked briskly toward the loading dock door. As Copeland neared the security desk, the man turned and headed back toward the guard. When he reached Copeland, the man placed his left hand on Copeland’s shoulder, stuck a .9 mm gun with a silencer to Copeland’s chest with his other hand and fired. The man shot the guard again after he had fallen.

As Copeland lay there playing dead, he heard the man walk to the security desk. He then heard equipment and wires being moved around followed by footsteps running toward the loading dock door.4 The owner of the snack bar called 911.Houston Police Officer Paul Terry arrived on the scene to find Copeland lying face down in the lobby. Copeland told Terry what had happened and the officer unsuccessfully searched for a suspect. Inside the lobby, Terry found spent shell casings and fragments of a fired bullet. He also noticed that the video equipment was missing.

That same evening, Szucs’s wife, Nicole, became concerned that her husband had not arrived home. After several failed attempts to reach her husband, she received a call from a friend who worked in the Greenrich Building who told her that the building guard had been shot. Nicole asked the friend to contact the building’s office manager. Sometime after 11:00 p.m., the building manager approached one of the officers remaining at the scene. Officer M.R. Furstenfeld and a couple of other officers then accompanied the manager to Szucs’s suite to check on his welfare. Upon gaining access to the office, Furstenfeld found Szucs’s dead body. Detectives who arrived at the scene noted no signs of a forced entry. They also noticed that the safe was empty and there were no signs of the 3.6 million dollar diamond inventory Szucs maintained or the $200,000 he was supposed to have on hand in cash. Plus, Szucs was not wearing the fivecarat diamond pinky ring he always wore nor was the ring ever recovered.

5 The detectives also discovered that Szucs’s computer had been damaged as if someone had tried to remove a disc with tweezers.6The police eventually focused their investigation upon [Reinaldo Dennes]. A search of his office revealed a lathe that had been broken down and boxed up, a fired .9 mm bullet, and an owner’s manual for a.9 mm Taurus handgun. Firearms examiner Robert Baldwin determined that the bullets recovered from Szucs’s body, the bullet found in [Reinaldo Dennes]’s office, and the bullets found in the lobby of the Greenrich Building were all fired from the same gun. Moreover, the cartridge casings found in the lobby of the Greenrich Building and those found in the field where [Dennes] tested the silencer were fired from the same gun. The weapon was determined to be either a Taurus or a Beretta .9 mm handgun.

https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20170324j62