Doyle Skillern Texas Execution

Doyle Skillern - Texas

Doyle Skillern was executed by the State of Texas for killing an undercover police officer. According to court documents Doyle Skillern and Charles Sanne believed that a man they were dealing with in their drug trade was a police informant. Doyle Skillern and Charles Sanne would shoot and kill Patrick Randel who was an undercover State Narcotics agent. Doyle Skillern and Charles Sanne would be arrested. Charles Sanne would be sentenced to life in prison. Doyle Skillern would be convicted and sentenced to death. Doyle Skillern would be put to death by lethal injection on January 16 1985

Doyle Skillern More News

Doyle Skillern, convicted as an accomplice in a murder in which the man who confessed to the slaying may soon go free, was executed early today by lethal injection.

He was pronounced dead at 12:23 A.M., central standard time, according to Phil Guthrie, spokesman for the Texas Department of Corrections.

His last words were, ”I pray my family will rejoice and forgive,” according to Attorney General Jim Mattox, a witness to the execution.

Mr. Skillern, 48 years old, died for the Oct. 24, 1974, slaying of Patrick Randel, an undercover narcotics agent for the Texas Department of Public Safety.

He had lost bids for a reprieve Tuesday from the United States Supreme Court and Gov. Mark White of Texas.

Fourth Execution in 1985

The fifth Texas inmate to be executed since 1982 and the 36th person nationwide since 1976, Mr. Skillern was the fourth person to be executed since the first of this year.

A spokesman for the state prisons, Phil Guthrie, said Mr. Skillern showed no emotion Tuesday when told of the Governor’s decision, but remarked, ”A lot of people will still have their troubles tomorrow and mine will be over.”

Governor White, who could have granted a 30-day reprieve, had previously refused reprieves for three other condemned men.

Mr. Skillern’s attorney, Shannon Salyer, had appealed for a stay from the United States Supreme Court, but late Tuesday afternoon the court voted 6 to 2 not to postpone the execution.

Father Cornelius Ryan brought Mr. Skillern holy communion Tuesday night, and the prison chaplain, Carroll Pickett, visited him.

Mr. Skillern did not shoot Mr. Randel, according to court testimony, but waited in a car nearby when Mr. Randel was shot six times by Charles Sanne, 51. Mr. Sanne also was convicted in the slaying, but received a life prison term and could be paroled soon.

Doyle Skillern was judged as guilty of the murder as Mr. Sanne under Texas’s ”law of parties,” which says accomplices can be found guilty of the most serious offense that occurs in a crime. Mr. Skillern had earlier been sentenced to five years in jail for killing his brother.

https://www.nytimes.com/1985/01/16/us/convict-in-texas-dies-by-injection.html

James Autry Texas Execution

James Autry - Texas

James Autry was executed by the State of Texas for the murder of a store clerk during a robbery. According to court documents James Autry would rob a convenience store and in the process shoot and kill Shirley Drouet. James Autry would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death. James Autry would be executed by lethal injection on March 14 1984

James Autry More News

Condemned killer James Autry was executed early this morning in the same Huntsville prison death chamber where he narrowly escaped death five months ago.

James Autry, sentenced to die for the 1980 murder of a convenience store clerk, had his last hope for a second reprieve dashed when Texas Gov. Mark White late last night refused to intervene. Shortly after, Autry was taken to the death chamber and injected with sodium thiopental, potassium chloride and pavulon, a muscle relaxant. He was pronounced dead at 12:40 a.m. CST.

Last October Autry was less than 30 minutes from death, strapped to a gurney with intravenous tubes dripping a saline solution into his veins in preparation for the lethal injection, when Supreme Court Justice Byron R. White granted a stay.

It was an 11th-hour reprieve for Autry, 29, as White said the high court should first rule on the “proportionality” issue–whether Autry’s sentence was in line with those given others for similar crimes. On Jan. 23 the court ruled, 7 to 2, that death-row inmates are not entitled to a special appeals court review on the issue, and Autry’s execution was rescheduled.

Yesterday the Supreme Court refused, again 7 to 2, to hear an appeal of Autry’s case, and a federal court refused to order that his execution be televised. White was the last stop, but he, too, refused to intervene, saying the case had been thoroughly reviewed by 14 judicial panels.

The narrowness of Autry’s October escape highlighted the role of legal tenacity in staving off executions, but the rescheduling of his execution was a reminder that appeals can and do run out.

Autry was the 14th man executed in the United States since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, while the death-row population has swelled to more than 1,200. In recent years the Supreme Court has expressed impatience with drawn-out, scattershot appeals in death penalty cases.

Autry’s brush with execution in October led to another effort by his lawyers to try to save him. ACLU attorney Stefan Presser argued in a petition to the Supreme Court last week that Autry had been subjected to “cruel and unusual punishment” during his first trip to the death chamber because officials strapped him to the gurney and inserted the intravenous tubes nearly an hour before his scheduled execution time, and because they then delayed telling Autry of the stay for 45 minutes. But the high court refused to hear the case Tuesday afternoon.

Autry’s lawyers also filed suit Monday in U.S. District Court in Texas, arguing that the execution should be stayed because the Texas Board of Corrections had denied Autry’s request that it be televised. But a District Court judge turned down this request.

“I want my execution on TV because it may help someone else from being put on death row and maybe someone will see my execution and decide the death penalty isn’t right,” Autry said in an affidavit filed with the suit.

But the board voted unanimously against televising his or other deaths. “I think it is in terribly bad taste. It shouldn’t be in people’s living rooms,” said Board Chairman Robert Gunn.

“They allow printed media but not electronic media to witness executions because they are trying to portray the death penalty in the least graphic way,” countered Presser.

After his last-minute reprieve in October, Autry told reporters that he had resigned himself to dying and said he “almost had a heart attack” as he lay connected to intravenous needles awaiting death.

Autry, an oil field roughnenck with a long criminal record, was condemned in 1980 for slaying Port Arthur convenience store clerk Shirley Drouet, 43, a mother of five who was shot between the eyes when she tried to collect $2.70 for a six-pack of beer. A customer in the store also was fatally shot and another person severely injured.

Autry maintained that his companion, John Sandifer, was responsible. Both were indicted for capital murder, but Sandifer plea bargained in a different case and received a seven-year sentence. He has since been paroled. Autry was offered a plea bargain, but turned it down and was convicted, primarily on Sandifer’s testimony.

Autry, the second person to be executed in Texas in 18 years (the other, convicted murderer Charlie Brooks Jr., 40, was executed by injection at Huntsville on Dec. 7, 1982), is the first of four death-row inmates scheduled to die in the state this month.

Texas has more than 170 people on death row.

Autry is not the only death-row inmate whose time may have run out this week. In North Carolina, James W. Hutchins is scheduled to die Friday morning for the 1979 shotgun slaying of three police officers. Hutchins came within 40 minutes of execution in January before the Supreme Court intervened.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1984/03/14/texas-murderer-is-executed-by-injection/ad12a121-09f4-47c4-b7ad-f917044ff04c/

Ronald O’Bryan Texas Execution

Ronald O'Bryan - Texas

Ronald O’Bryan was executed by the State of Texas for the murder of his son. According to court documents Ronald O’Bryan would take out a large life insurance policy on his son and waited for Halloween. On Halloween Ronald O’Bryan son would die after eating a candy that was laced with poison. Soon police would figure out that Ronald O’Bryan was responsible and he would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death. Ronald O’Bryan would be executed on March 31, 1984 by lethal injection.

Ronald O’Bryan More News

They say a little rain never hurt anyone. So, when it started drizzling on the night of Halloween 1974, Ronald Clark O’Bryan decided he’d still take his children trick-or-treating. The family only ventured into a few neighborhoods before heading home. Tragically, by the end of the night, O’Bryan’s 8-year-old son, Timothy, would be more than hurt. At bedtime, the boy collapsed from unbearable stomach pain and, on the way to the hospital, died. Authorities determined that he had ingested cyanide-laced candy. Days later, they arrested O’Bryan for the murder of his son.

A&E True Crime explores a case that rattled the nation—and the legacy of the man who killed Halloween.

A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing

Ronald Clark O’Bryan lived with his wife Daynene and two children, Timothy and Elizabeth, in Deer Park, Texas, a middle-class suburb of Houston. He worked as an optician and served as a deacon at a Baptist church, where he sang in the choir and oversaw the parochial bus program. Those who knew O’Bryan considered him a model citizen. One pastor described O’Bryan as “a good, Christian man and an above-average father.”

In reality, O’Bryan had difficulty holding down a job. He was employed by 21 different companies over a 10-year period and fired from each for negligence or fraudulent behavior. In the fall of 1974, 30-year-old O’Bryan was on the brink of being fired again after his employer, Texas State Optical, suspected him of stealing money. His take-home salary of $150 a week barely covered food and rent, and it was later discovered that he was more than $100,000 in debt. He had defaulted on several bank loans and his car was on the verge of being repossessed.

Whether out of greed or desperation, or both, O’Bryan concocted a twisted plan, one that would alleviate his financial woes and even allow him to live a more “comfortable” life. He’d carry it out on Halloween 1974.

An Evil Far Scarier Than Ghosts and Goblins

October 31, 1974 began like any other Halloween night. Although O’Bryan had never shown a real interest in Halloween before, this year he was eager to take his children trick-or-treating. Jim Bates, a family friend, and his two children joined the O’Bryan family for the evening excursion.

At one house, the children went to the door but received no response. O’Bryan remained behind the group. After a minute or so, he caught up with them holding five giant Pixy Stix—a sweet and sour powdered candy that came in a straw-like tube—claiming that the neighbors were actually home and handing out expensive treats. When they arrived back at the Bates’ house, O’Bryan gave each of the four children one candy and then handed the last one to a random trick-or-treater who knocked on his door.

Before bed, O’Bryan told his children they could have one piece of candy. Timothy decided on the Pixy Stix. The boy complained that the candy tasted bitter, so O’Bryan gave him Kool-Aid to help wash it down. “Thirty seconds after I left Tim’s room, I heard him cry to me, ‘Daddy, daddy, my stomach hurts,’” O’Bryan later told police. “He was in the bathroom convulsing, vomiting and gasping and then he suddenly went limp.” Timothy died en route to the hospital less than an hour after eating the candy.

When Timothy’s body was brought to the morgue, the medical examiner recalled the scent of almonds coming from the boy’s mouth, often a telltale sign of cyanide poisoning. An autopsy later confirmed that Timothy had consumed enough potassium cyanide to kill two or three grown men. Police were able to retrieve the other four Pixy Stix—all of which were uneaten—and determined that someone had replaced the top two inches of each with granules of cyanide.

Investigators had O’Bryan and Bates retrace their steps from Halloween night. O’Bryan gave conflicting accounts as to which house handed out the poisoned candy. They soon learned about O’Bryan’s financial problems and discovered he had taken out multiple life insurance policies on his children. They also found a piece of adding machine tape. On it, O’Bryan had written down the amount of each of his bills. The total came to almost the exact amount he stood to collect from the insurance proceeds.

As police dug deeper, they also learned that O’Bryan had inquired with several chemical companies on where to buy cyanide and jokingly asked how much it would take to kill a person. They found a pocketknife in O’Bryan’s home with candy residue on it, suggesting how the candy might have been contaminated. Although O’Bryan played the part of a grieving father and maintained his innocence, after failing a polygraph, he was arrested on November 5, 1974 and charged with Timothy’s murder.

“I am not able to imagine a crime more reprehensible than someone killing his own child for money,” Clyde DeWitt, a former assistant district attorney in Houston who worked on the case, tells A&E True Crime.

Ronald Clark O’ Bryan’s Conviction and Appeals

According to Joni Johnston, a forensic psychologist and private investigator, poisoners as a group typically lack empathy, evidenced by the premeditated nature in which they kill, and the cold, calculating strategy they often use. “[Poisoning] is also an instrument for someone who is kind of cunning and sneaky, not somebody who is going to be physically or verbally aggressive. They are also more likely to be polite behind the scenes and, as a result, they tend to fool people,” Johnston tells A&E True Crime.

But O’Bryan’s days of fooling people were over. On June 3, 1975, after less than an hour of deliberations, a Harris County jury convicted O’Bryan of murder and sentenced him to death.

After being found guilty, O’Bryan appealed his case multiple times, twice to the Supreme Court. “Back then, the constitutional issues surrounding the death penalty were far less settled than is the case now. O’Bryan’s attorney had quite a bit to work with,” says DeWitt.

DeWitt wrote the brief for O’Bryan’s final appeal in 1979. “The facts were extensive and horrible. As I recall, the last sentence of my oral argument to the Court of Criminal Appeals was something like, ‘If these facts do not support the jury’s death sentence, there never will be facts that will,’” says Dewitt, who says he has since developed misgivings about the death penalty.

In the end, all appeals were denied, and O’Bryan was executed by lethal injection on March 31, 1984 at the Texas State Penitentiary at Huntsville. “What is about to transpire in a few moments is wrong… I would forgive all who have taken part in any way in my death,” O’Bryan’s last words read.

Ronald Clark O’Bryan’s Haunting Legacy

O’Bryan, now known by the nicknames “The Man Who Killed Halloween” and “The Candy Man,” never confessed to his crimes, but there are theories as to why he chose Halloween and poisoned candy to carry out his murder.

“It’s thought that he was aware of the urban legends about Halloween poisoners, and cynically assumed that his use of cyanide-laced candy would deflect suspicion from him to some anonymous boogeyman,” David Skal, a cultural expert on Halloween and author of Fright Favorites: 31 Movies to Haunt Your Halloween and Beyond, tells A&E True Crime.

Nearly 50 years later, O’Bryan’s legacy continues to haunt those familiar with the case. “I spent a month of my life working on it,” says DeWitt. “It is burned into my brain, as you might imagine.”

In a 2004 interview, former Harris County Assistant District Attorney Mike Hinton said, “[O’Bryan is] the man that ruined Halloween for the whole world.”

Skal says that despite O’Bryan’s horrific crime, Halloween shouldn’t be feared. “There is no general correlation in America between the holiday and increased crime. In particular, the widespread fear of poisoned or booby-trapped candy is an urban legend without a real basis.”

Thomas Barefoot Texas Execution

Thomas Barefoot - Texas

Thomas Barefoot was executed by the State of Texas for the murder of a police officer. According to court documents Thomas Barefoot was being placed under arrest for the rape of a three year old girl when he shot and killed a police officer. Thomas Barefoot would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death. Thomas Barefoot would be executed by lethal injection on October 30, 1984

Thomas Barefoot More News

Convicted copkiller Thomas Barefoot dodged four dates with the executioner in Texas, but lost his last hope for a reprieve Monday, while the death stay request of Earnest Knighton was also rejected a final time by Louisiana’s governor and the courts.

Both men were scheduled to be executed shortly after midnight.

Texas Gov. Mark White late Monday refused to halt Barefoot’s death by injection, and a series of state and federal courts rejected last-ditch efforts to block Knighton’s execution.

The state Supreme Court in Louisiana late Monday voted 6-0 in refusing to stop Knighton’s scheduled death by electrocution. U.S. District Judge Tom Stagg in Shreveport, La., the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans and the U.S. Supreme Court also refused to intervene.

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court voted 7-2 to reject an appeal seeking to halt Barefoot’s execution and review his conviction and sentence.

Meanwhile, North Carolina attorneys for Margie Velma Barfield, a convicted poisoner, filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court to stop her Friday execution. The 52-year-old grandmother, who admitted killing her mother and three others, would become the nation’s first woman executed in 22 years

Thomas Barefoot, 39, an oilfield roughneck who said God promised to spare him, spent Monday in his cell, visiting with relatives and friends, a prison spokesman in Huntsville, Texas, said.

‘If God tells me it’s not going to rain and I go get an umbrella, then it’s going to rain,’ Barefoot said.

Knighton, 38, faces ‘Gruesome Gerdie,’ nickname for Louisiana’s battered electric chair in Angola, La.

Knighton’s attorneys twice urged Gov. Edwin Edwards to stay his execution, claiming Knighton was drug crazed when he killed RalphShell of Bossier City, La., and took $300 from his service station.

Thomas Barefoot was convicted in the 1978 shooting death of Harker Heights police officer Carl LeVin.

He won two stays of execution in 1983 and one each in 1980 and 1981. His case was selected by the Supreme Court last year to test how to handle last-minute appeals to the federal courts.

‘It’s worse whenever I really think it’s going to happen,’ LeVin’s widow said. ‘I thought he was going to be executed in January ’83. I’m at a fever pitch now. When it doesn’t (happen), it hurts. It really hurts.’

LeVin was shot once in the head while investigating a case of arson. The .25-caliber pistol used in the slaying was found in Barefoot’s pocket when he was arrested

Barefoot’s attorneys argued psychiatric testimony used in the punishment phase was gotten illegally and important information was suppressed.

They also wanted Texas officials to halt executions until the Supreme Court rules on whether execution by injection is legal.

Twenty-six people have been executed since the Supreme Court removed the ban on the death penalty eight years ago

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1984/10/29/Convicted-copkiller-Thomas-Andy-Barefoot-dodged-four-dates-with/1288467874000/

Charlie Brooks Texas Execution

charlie brooks texas

Charlie Brooks was executed by the State of Texas for kidnapping, robbery and murder. According to court documents Charlie Brooks would test drive a vehicle at a car lot, the employee who went with him on the ride would be kidnapped, brought to a hotel where he was shot and killed. Charlie Brooks would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death. Charlie Brooks would be the first inmate who would be executed by lethal injection on December 7, 1982

Charlie Brooks More News

When Charles Brooks Jr. lay down on a gurney in the execution chamber, there was no way to know exactly what would happen next.

On this day in 1982, Brooks was the first person to be executed by injecting a cocktail of drugs intended to numb his body and mind, paralyze him and stop his heart. His death, the first by lethal injection, sparked an ethics debate among the public and physicians about whether the procedure is humane, one that continues today

Charlie Brooks was convicted of murdering David Gregory, an auto mechanic, wrote Dick Reavis for Texas Monthly in early 1983. Gregory rode with Brooks during a test drive at the used-car lot where he worked. That night, he was found tied up in a motel room. He had been shot in the head. In separate trials, both Brooks and partner in crime Woodie Loudres were sentenced to die for the crime. Loudres was able to reduce his sentence, but Brooks was not, although no weapon was ever found and officials never determined who shot Gregory.

Lethal injection was seen to be more humane than other execution methods, like gas, electrocution or hanging, according to an article on History.com. Because one of the drugs used was supposed to put the condemned in a state of deep sedation, it was also perceived to be painless. In spite of physician protests that lethal injection was a violation of medical ethics, wrote Robert Reinhold of The New York Times, it was seen as acceptable. But conflicting witness reports at Brooks’s death led Reinhold to report that “the procedure did not seem to settle the question of whether such a death was painless.”

The conviction that landed Charlie Brooks on death row wasn’t his first. What was different this time:  he knew that if the state didn’t intervene in his case, he could become the first man on death row to be killed by a cocktail of drugs designed to numb his mind and stop his heart. “In his best mood,” Reavis wrote: “Charlie thought that there was nothing to fear in death by injection. He believed that he could set it up to be like the surgery after the first of his bullet woundings.”

Brooks and Reavis made an agreement: if the condemned man felt pain during his execution, he would shake his head, like he was saying “no,” and Reavis would understand. They repeated the agreement at each meeting

In the end, the state didn’t grant Charlie Brooks a stay of execution. “For the first time in American penal history,” Reavis wrote, “men who were neither physicians nor sorcerers got ready to execute a prisoner with the forbidden tools of medicine and pharmacology,”

“According to four reporters who witnessed the execution in a tiny room at the edge of the prison’s Walls unit, Mr. Brooks appeared to have suffered some pain,” Reinhold wrote.

Today, those killed by lethal injection are almost as likely to be guinea pigs for the procedure as Brooks was. Supplies of known lethal-injection cocktails are running out across the United States, reports Tess Owen for Vice. Injections nationwide are at a 25-year low, she writes, partially because it’s increasingly hard for corrections departments to get the drugs they need to perform them. This deficit has led to correctional departments trying untested mixes of drugs to replace the old standards they aren’t able to get anymore, with grim results. Only Texas, Georgia and Missouri are using the death penalty “with any regularity,” writes Mike Brantley for AL.com. But the death penalty remains legal, and those who face the prospect of death at state hands may potentially be killed using untried cocktails of drugs.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/thirty-four-years-ago-first-person-died-lethal-injection-it-was-controversial-then-too-180961343/