Timothy Hennis Military Death Row

Timothy Hennis military death row

Timothy Hennis was sentenced to death by the US Military for a triple murder that took place in North Carolina. According to court documents the bodies of Katie, Kara and Erin Eastburn were found in their home by a worried neighbor. The mother, Katie, had been sexually assaulted and stabbed multiple times. five year old Kara had also been stabbed in the chest and her three year old sister Erin was bludgeoned in the back and chest. When police arrived on the scene and searched for evidence it became apparent that the murderer attempted to clean up the crime scene. Timothy Hennis would submit his blood, saliva, fingerprints and palm prints to authorities voluntarily however when a witness would point him out he was arrested.

Timothy Hennis first trial ended in a conviction and he was sentenced to death

Timothy Hennis conviction would later be overturned on Appeal. At his second trial Timothy Hennis would be found not guilty on all counts. After being freed Timothy Hennis would rejoin the US Military until he retired in 2004.

In 2006 DNA became a valuable tool and when the DNA taken from the Eastburn crime scene were tested it provided a positive link to Timothy Hennis. Hennis would be rearrested, convicted and sentenced to death. Timothy Hennis continues to file appeals saying he is innocent of the charges

As of 2021 he remains on Military Death Row

Military Death Row Inmate List

Timothy Hennis More News

Courtroom experts call it a one-of-kind murder mystery that some people believe has yet to be completely solved. The remarkable story of Timothy Hennis and the stabbing deaths of a mother and two small girls is full of shocking legal twists and turns.

During the course of 21 years, Timothy Hennis underwent three trials for the same crimes in three courtrooms. The case puts constitutional questions about double jeopardy squarely under the spotlight.

It all began in Fayetteville, North Carolina, in 1985. Hennis, who was then a 27-year-old Army soldier based at nearby Fort Bragg, visited the home of Kathryn Eastburn and her husband, Gary, a captain in the Air Force. The Eastburns were planning to move outside the country and had placed an ad in the newspaper to sell their dog. Hennis stopped by the house in response to the ad.

Four days later, when neighbors became concerned, police entered the home to find the bloody bodies of Kathryn Eastburn and two of her daughters. The youngest Eastburn child, a 22-month-old girl named Jana, was found in the house alive. Police said Gary Eastburn was undergoing training in Alabama at the time of the killings.

Timothy Hennis came forward to police when he heard on TV news that authorities were looking for a man who visited the house in response to a newspaper ad.

Investigators had been gathering evidence and interviewing witnesses. A witness named Patrick Cone said he was near the Eastburn home the night of the killings and saw a tall white man wearing jeans, a knit cap and a Members Only jacket leaving the Eastburns’ driveway with a trash bag. A police artist drew a sketch based on Cone’s description. Prosecutors said the sketch resembled Hennis. Police put Hennis in a line up, and prosecutors said Cone identified Hennis as the man he saw.

Police arrested Timothy Hennis and in 1986, prosecutors put him on trial. They said his motive was sex.

The theory was that “Hennis’ wife was out of town, he had a new baby and so he decided to make a pass at a married mother of three – and that didn’t go well,” former local reporter Scott Whisnant told CNN’s “Death Row Stories.” Whisnant had covered the case in depth for Wilmington’s Morning Star newspaper.

Gary Eastburn told police several items were missing from his home, including an envelope of cash, an ATM card and the Eastburn account password. Police said the ATM card was used to withdraw $150 twice over two days.

Prosecutors said Hennis was behind on his rent, which was about $300. He paid his rent the Monday after the killings, prosecutors said. A woman who used the same bank ATM shortly after the Eastburns’ ATM card was used told investigators she saw a man nearby matching Hennis’ description.

During the trial, prosecutors showed jurors gruesome police photos to illustrate their case. The jury rendered a guilty verdict and sentenced Timothy Hennis to death.

While on death row, Hennis received a mysterious, anonymous letter in the mail: “Dear Mr. Hennis,” the letter said. “I did the crime, I murdered the Eastburns. Sorry you’re doin the time. I’ll be safely out of North Carolina when you read this. Thanks, Mr. X”

The letter’s author was never determined.

Hennis’ lawyers appealed his case to North Carolina’s Supreme Court, where judges ruled that the graphic police photos had wrongly influenced jurors to render a guilty verdict. The ruling allowed Hennis a rare second chance to prove his case in a retrial.

Compared with the first trial, Hennis’ defense attorneys engineered a complete 180 on their strategy. After exhaustive preparation, they attacked many of the prosecutors’ most damaging accusations one by one. They discredited the prosecutors’ star witness, Patrick Cone, and his testimony. He had testified that the weather was clear the night of the killings, but another witness said it was overcast.

A new defense witness who looked similar to Hennis testified he was walking in the neighborhood at the time of the killings.

The witness, John Raupaugh, “lived down the street from the Eastburns,” Whisnant told “Death Row Stories.” “He was an uneasy sleeper and had a habit of walking the neighborhood at 3 in the morning. He often wore a beanie hat and he had a black Members Only jacket.” Raupaugh’s testimony, defense attorneys said, gave jurors the reasonable doubt they needed to acquit Hennis in 1989.

Escaping death row as a newly freed man, Hennis then re-enlisted in the Army, eventually retiring in 2004 as a master sergeant.

But prosecutors continued to pursue the case.

In 2006, vaginal swabs from a rape kit taken from Kathryn Eastburn’s body yielded new evidence. DNA testing was an imperfect science in the 1980s, so the semen found in Kathryn Eastburn’s vagina wasn’t pursued as evidence during the first trial. But by the 2000s, technological advances in DNA analysis had improved. Experts said the DNA from Eastburn’s rape kit was consistent with Hennis’ DNA.

A team of military attorneys evaluated the case and the Army decided to pursue it. Hennis was recalled to active duty two years after his retirement and promptly arrested on three counts of murder.

“Tim Hennis is the only person in United States history who’s been tried for his life three times after guilty and not guilty verdicts,” said Whisnant, whose book “Innocent Victims” was made into a 1996 TV movie.

Many observers were surprised. Wasn’t Hennis shielded by constitutional protections against so-called double jeopardy?

“In the simplest terms, if a defendant is acquitted and the prosecutor says to the judge, ‘I want a do-over,’ that is clearly prohibited. That’s the definition of double jeopardy,” said CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin. “But if a different prosecutor in a different court comes up with a different way to frame charges in the same crime, then that is generally permissible.”

Maj. Rob Stelle of the Army Judge Advocate General Corps, who worked on the Hennis case, told “Death Row Stories” that the military’s ability to prosecute a case that has already been tried is “well-settled law. Nothing the state does actually effects what the federal government can do.”

“In a very narrow category of cases where the federal government believes an injustice has been done, then federal prosecutors will step in,” Toobin said. “But by and large, they operate in separate spheres.”

When it came down to it, the prosecution’s case in Hennis’ court-martial hinged on the DNA testing results.

“The sperm found in the vagina of Mrs. Kathryn Eastburn is the person who raped and slaughtered her and her children. And that’s Timothy Hennis,” Maj. Matt Scott, another Army JAG attorney who worked on the case, told “Death Row Stories.”

The jury rendered a guilty verdict and sentenced Hennis to death. He now sits in solitary confinement on death row at Fort Leavenworth military prison in Kansas, awaiting appeal.

But many unanswered questions remain. “There’s a ton of physical evidence in that house that they can’t explain,” Whisnant told CNN’s “Death Row Stories.”

A head hair was found in the Eastburns’ bed that is not Hennis’, Whisnant said. Unidentified DNA was found under Kathryn Eastburn’s fingernails. “We should be running that DNA against our known database,” Whisnant said. “Let’s find out what happened.”

It likely will be a long time before the final page is written in this bizarre murder mystery.

Even after the appeals process is over, Hennis cannot be executed without presidential approval. In recent years, that hasn’t happened very often. The U.S. military has not executed anyone from its ranks since 1961.

https://www.cnn.com/2014/07/18/us/death-row-stories-hennis

Nidal Malik Hasan Military Death Row

Nidal Malik Hasan military death row

Nidal Malik Hasan was sentenced to death by the US Military for the murders of thirteen members of the US Military. According to court documents Nidal Malik Hasan was responsible for the Fort Hood Shooting which took place on November 5, 2009 which saw thirteen people shot dead and over thirty others injured. Nidal Hasan was severely injured in the attack was later tried and convicted in Military Court and sentenced to death. As of 2021 he remains on Military Death Row

Military Death Row Inmate List

Nidal Malik Hasan More News

Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was sentenced to death Wednesday for killing 13 people and wounding 32 others in a 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Tex., the worst mass murder at a military installation in U.S. history.

Dressed in Army fatigues, Nidal Malik Hasan, who turns 43 next month, listened impassively as the death sentence was handed down by a panel of 13 senior military officers in a unanimous decision after less than two hours of deliberations. If even a single panel member had objected, Hasan would instead have been sentenced to life in prison. He also was stripped of pay and other financial benefits, which he continued to receive while in custody.

No active-duty service member has been executed since 1961, and legal experts said it will probably be many years, if ever, before the sentence will be carried out. Nidal Malik Hasan will be flown shortly to Fort Leavenworth, Kan., where he will join five other inmates on military death row, officials said.

In military cases, there are several mandatory appeal stages and a military death sentence requires final approval by the president, as commander in chief.

Despite the expected delays, survivors of the shooting welcomed the verdict. According to news reports, Kathy Platoni, an Army reservist, said: “From the bottom of my heart — he doesn’t deserve to live. I don’t know how long it takes for a death sentence to be carried out, but the world will be a better place without him.”

Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, was found guilty this month on 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder after opening fire Nov. 5, 2009, at Fort Hood’s Soldier Readiness Processing Center, where troops were getting medical checkups before deploying to Afghanistan.

Hasan, who was scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan a few weeks later, shouted “Allahu ­akbar!” meaning “God is great,” before targeting soldiers with a high-powered, high-capacity handgun he had fitted with laser sights. He was apprehended by military police officers after firing more than 200 shots.

Prosecutors aggressively pursued the death sentence during the 22-day court-martial this month, calling more than 100 witnesses, including 20 victims and relatives of the deceased to testify in a courtroom just a few miles from the site of the shooting.

During two days of evidence ahead of his sentencing, they described, in often emotional testimony, their grief and suffering.

Staff Sgt. Patrick Zeigler, who was shot four times and had more than 20 percent of his brain removed in surgery, told the court, “I was expected to either die or remain in a vegetative state.” He said that his personality has changed and that he is “a lot angrier, a lot darker than I used to be.”

The father of a pregnant 21-year-old private from Chicago, Francheska Velez, who was fatally shot as she pleaded for the life of her baby, testified in Spanish that Hasan had “killed me slowly.” Velez was one of three women killed in the shooting.

The court heard that Hasan had carefully planned his attack, training at a local firing range and researching jihad on his computer. The FBI and Defense Department have drawn criticism for failing to prevent the attack after missing a number of warning signs.

Hasan, an American-born Muslim, had exchanged e-mails with a leading al-Qaeda figure in which he asked whether those attacking fellow soldiers were martyrs. The e-mails were seen by the FBI. Hasan also once gave a presentation to Army doctors discussing Islam and suicide bombers and said Muslims should be allowed to leave the armed forces as conscientious objectors to avoid “adverse events.”

The psychiatrist, who acted as his own attorney, tried to plead guilty before the start of the trial but was unable to do so under military rules governing death penalty cases.

He called no witnesses, offered no testimony and declined to make any statements beyond a brief opening comment in which he took responsibility for the shooting and said he was a soldier who had decided to “switch sides” in what he believed was a U.S. war against Islam.

As a result, he faced accusations that he deliberately sought the death sentence.

But in a phone interview Wednesday, his former attorney denied that Hasan, who is paralyzed from the chest down and uses a wheelchair after being shot by military officers, had a death wish.

John P. Galligan, a civilian lawyer who regularly visits Hasan in jail, said his former client was denied the opportunity to defend himself when the judge barred him from arguing that he had carried out the mass shooting to save the lives of Taliban leaders in Afghanistan.

Galligan, who continues to provide legal assistance, denounced the proceedings as “almost a ludicrous show trial to secure a death penalty, even though they know it’s unlikely that it would be ever actually implemented.”

Galligan said the appeals would probably “go on for decades.”

“In all honesty, he stands a far more likely chance of dying from medical reasons than dying because he’s been sentenced to death,” he said

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nidal-hasan-sentenced-to-death-for-fort-hood-shooting-rampage/2013/08/28/aad28de2-0ffa-11e3-bdf6-e4fc677d94a1_story.html

Ronald Gray Military Death Row

ronald gray military death row

Ronald Gray was sentenced to death by the US Military for four murders. According to court documents Ronald Gray is a serial killer and a serial rapist. Ronald Gray murdered a civilian, Linda Jean Coats, on April 27, 1986. Gray would sexually assault and murder Tammy Cofer Wilson on December 11, 1986. Ronald would sexually assault and murder Private Laura Lee Vickery-Clay on December 15, 1986 her body would be found a month later. On January 3, 1987 Ronald Gray would sexually assault Private Mary Ann Lang Nameth and would attempt to murder the woman however thankfully she escaped. Ronald Gray would sexually assault and murder Kimberly Ann Ruggles. Ronald Gray would be arrested and tried in civilian court in North Carolina where he would be found guilty and sentenced to eight life terms for the murders of Coats and Wilson. Ronald Gray would next be tried in Military court where he would be found guilty of the murders of Ruggles and Vickery-Clay and sentenced to death. As of 2021 he remains on Military Death Row

Military Death Row Inmate List

Ronald Gray More News

The Supreme Court has denied a request to consider the case of former soldier Ronald Gray, who was convicted of rapes and murders in the 1980s at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Gray’s petition was denied June 28 by the Supreme Court, according to court documents online, which did not detail a reason for the decision.

Ronald Gray and his attorneys have submitted numerous appeals as part of a 30-year process since he was convicted.

In 1988, a military court at Fort Bragg convicted Gray of the rape and murder of two women and rape and attempted murder of a third at Fort Bragg and the nearby area. At the time, he was a specialist working as a cook. He was sentenced to death.

He pleaded guilty in a civilian court to two other killings and five rapes, and he was given eight life sentences.

Gray’s appeals have become more frequent in the last two years since 2016, when a federal judge removed the stay of execution that had been in effect for eight years, The Fayetteville Observer reported. He is running out of appeals to avoid execution

He also appealed in 2001 to the Supreme Court, which declined to hear the case. In October 2016, the Supreme Court said it would not hear challenges to the death penalty for members of the military and rejected an appeal from a former soldier sentenced to death for killing two other soldiers in Kuwait in 2003.

Ronald Gray has been detained at the U.S. Army Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/07/06/convicted-murderer-rapist-ronald-gray-loses-bid-to-bring-case-to-supreme-court/

Ronald Gray Other News

A former Fort Bragg soldier and convicted serial killer with a case before the Supreme Court has found an ally in a group of Air Force lawyers hoping to help end gridlock in the military justice system.

Ronald Gray, who committed a series of murders and rapes in Fayetteville and on Fort Bragg in the 1980s, filed a petition with the nation’s highest court in February.

Last month, the U.S. Air Force Appellate Defense Division filed an amici curiae, or “friend of the court,” brief in support of Gray’s petition, which seeks to have the Supreme Court settle several legal questions hanging over his case.

The central issue is a question of which court system — military or civil — is responsible for hearing appeals related to constitutional claims that arise during or in conjunction with a direct appeal.

Gray’s case has been embroiled in such appeals since 2008, when then-President George W. Bush approved Gray’s eventual execution.

Timothy Kaine, Gray’s lawyer, has described the standoff as a “nearly decade-long contest of hot potato between military and civil courts.”

In their brief, Lt. Col. Nicholas McCue, Capt. Dustin Weisman and Brian L. Mizer of the Air Force Appellate Defense Division said they supported the arguments from Gray’s lawyers that the military courts should handle such matters.

The Air Force lawyers listed five other cases in various military courts that are in a similar state of “judicial limbo” with military and civil courts each insisting the other has primary jurisdiction.

“In essence, these petitioners no longer have a court available to them to hear their constitutional claim that they have been convicted in violation of the presumption of innocence,” they wrote.

The case also would have an impact on future military petitioners, they note in their brief while asking the Supreme Court to rule in favor of Gray and compel the military courts to assume jurisdiction.

Lawyers representing the U.S. government received an extension to respond to Gray’s petition. They have an April 18 deadline to file their arguments in the case.

Gray is the longest-serving inmate on the military’s death row and the only military prisoner whose execution has been approved by a president.

His petition before the Supreme Court is part of a nearly 30-year legal battle related to his crimes. The Supreme Court previously declined to review the case in 2001.

In recent years, the case has been the subject of numerous appeals, many of which were dismissed or delayed as courts struggled over how to proceed.

Gray is seeking a review of several claims of constitutional error during his military trial and subsequent appeals. He has claimed that his original appeals lawyer was ineffective, that his sentence is the result of racial discrimination and that military authorities failed to disclose evidence about his competency.

The case has been heard repeatedly by officials from a U.S. District Court in Kansas, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the Army Court of Criminal Appeals and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

In Gray’s petition, Kaine wrote that the “litigation ping pong” has resulted in a system in which convicted enemy combatants have a clearer system in which to appeal their cases than do many military prisoners.

Gray’s appeals have taken on an added urgency since late 2016, when a federal judge removed a stay of execution that had been in place since 2008, potentially clearing the way for the Army to schedule Gray’s death.

A former resident of Fairlane Acres near Bonnie Doone in Fayetteville, Gray was an Army specialist working as a cook before he was convicted of a series of rapes and murders that were committed in 1986 and 1987 on Fort Bragg and near Fairlane Acres Mobile Home Park off Santa Fe Drive.

Gray killed cab driver Kimberly Ann Ruggles, Army Pvt. Laura Lee Vickery-Clay, Campbell University student Linda Jean Coats and Fairlane Acres resident and soldier’s wife Tammy Wilson.

Gray was convicted during two trials. A Fort Bragg court sentenced him to death in 1988, after convicting him of the rape and murder of two women and the rape and attempted murder of a third, among other offenses.

A civilian court in 1987 sentenced him to eight life sentences, including three to be served consecutively, after convictions on charges of two counts of second-degree murder, five counts of rape and a number of other offenses related to different victims.

Gray has been confined at the U.S. Army Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, since he was sentenced to death.

If he is executed, it would be the first death sentence carried out by the U.S. military since 1961. An execution would likely take place at the United States Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana — the same facility where, in 2001, terrorist Timothy McVeigh was executed for the bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995.

https://www.fayobserver.com/news/20180405/ronald-gray-air-force-lawyers-file-brief-in-supreme-court-case-of-former-bragg-soldier

Hasan Akbar Military Death Row

Hasan Akbar Military Death Row

Hasan Akbar was sentenced to death by the US Military for two murders and eleven attempted murders. According to court documents Hasan Akbar would throw two grenades and open fire on US Service Person Personell in Kuwait injuring two Officers and injuring eleven serviceman. Hasan Akbar was arrested, convicted and sentenced to death. As of 2021 he remains on Military Death Row

Military Death Row Inmate List

Hasan Akbar More News

Sgt. Hasan Akbar was sentenced to death Thursday night for killing Army Airborne Capt. Christopher Scott Seifert and another officer during a grenade and rifle attack in Kuwait two years ago.

Sgt. Hasan Akbar, it is my duty as the president judge of the military panel of this court-martial to inform you…it is the unanimous decision of us all that you should be put to death,” the jury foreman said.

The 34-year-old Akbar, who earlier in the day pleaded for forgiveness, did not react. A gasp rose from the families of Seifert and Air Force Maj. Gregory “Linus” Stone who gathered to hear the outcome with some of the 14 soldiers Akbar wounded in at Camp Pennsylvania.

“We are satisfied with the verdict and believe that the panel has sent forth the appropriate sentence,” Seifert’s widow, Terri Seifert, said later. The decision means Akbar, a Muslim, has become the first U.S. soldier since the early Vietnam era to receive death for murdering a comrade during wartime.

Christopher Seifert’s parents, Helen and Tom, who still live in the Williams Township home where they raised their only child, did not comment after the verdict. They and a cordon of five soldiers wounded by Akbar stood behind Terri Seifert as she spoke.

“Sgt. Akbar is a non-entity to me,” Terri Seifert said. “What Sgt. Akbar has to say is irrelevant to me.”

The 15-member military jury was equally unconvinced of Akbar’s sincerity Thursday or his alleged insanity on March 23, 2003.

It took seven hours for the jury to decide unanimously that Akbar deserved the ultimate punishment for killing Seifert, 27, and Stone, 40, of Boise, Idaho.

“We didn’t come here seeking vengeance; that is for the Lord,” Stone family spokeswoman Karin Tackabery read from a prepared statement. “We did come seeking earthly justice for Gregg, Chris and all the real American soldiers that were wounded, the families that were destroyed and the three little boys who are now without fathers.”

Akbar’s parents, John Akbar and Quran Bilal, declined comment. Nor did they testify as expected.

Stone’s fiance, Tammie Eslinger, said the seven hours of jury deliberations was nerve wracking. “It seemed like years,” she said. “I prayed. I talked to Gregg a little bit. I was pleased with the panel’s decision.”

The verdict, however, does not mean Akbar — who prosecutors said attacked his comrades to prevent them from going to war against Muslims — has an inevitable date with a lethal needle. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, death sentences undergo a five- step review, which can take years to complete.

The convening authority in the case, Maj. Gen Virgil L. Packett 2nd, acting commander of 18th Airborne and Fort Bragg, has the power to reduce the sentence to life.

Should he sign off the death sentence, the decision then goes before the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, a panel of at least three commissioned officers or civilian lawyers, which can also reduce the sentence.

An upheld death sentence is reviewed a third time, by the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces, a panel of five civilian judges. Finally, Akbar can petition the U.S. Supreme Court for relief.

Five men are on death row at the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kan. Army Spc. Ronald A. Gray has been on death row the longest, since April 1988. The last was executed in 1961. The last military death sentence handed down was in 1996 to Army Sgt. William Kreutzer; it was overturned on appeal.

At 9:15 a.m., before closing arguments, Akbar, against the advice of his counsel, spoke to the jury in an attempt to save his life.

Akbar spoke in a whisper.

“I want to apologize for the attack that occurred,” Akbar said so softly prosecutors and others in the courtroom leaned forward and cupped their ears. “I felt my life was in jeopardy, and I had no other options. I also ask you for forgiveness.”

It lasted less than a minute. Prosecutors did not question him because it was not a sworn statement under oath.

The jury, however, was not swayed. It announced its sentence at 8:40 p.m.

Both the government and defense presented impassioned closing statements.

Lead prosecutor Lt. Col. Michael Mulligan angrily reiterated the government’s case: Akbar is a calculating murderer who valued his Muslim faith over the lives of his comrades.

“He can now and forever be called a cold-blooded killer,” the prosecutor said. “The appropriate sentence in this case is that the accused be put to death. He should forfeit his life.”

War is dirty and bloody, fought by men with M4 rifles and grenades, Mulligan said, and Akbar, driven by hatred, unleashed his own personal war on innocent, sleeping men to whom he swore allegiance.

“This is what he wrote, and this is what he did,” Mulligan repeated over and over while a jumbo computer screen flashed diary passages about murder and violence and then crime scene photos.

The prosecutor choked up describing how Seifert’s 2-year-old son, Benjamin, will grow up without knowing his father.

“For Benjamin, Father’s Day will be a yearly reminder of loss,” Mulligan read from prepared remarks. “For Christmas and Thanksgiving there will always be one empty place for Chris Seifert, murdered by the enemy within the wire.”

Recognizing the mounting tension and rising resentment against his client, Coombs, in his closing argument, urged restraint.

Coombs told jurors he understands their pain because as a fellow solider he feels betrayed too. But, he said the law dictates they must put aside their personal feelings in order to render a “logical and reasonable” verdict.

“This would be my recommendation,” Coombs said, “life without the possibility of parole.”

He said Akbar’s seemingly damning diary entries do not portray his client as a man with hatred in his heart. Coombs said the entries show Akbar, a once brilliant student, was slowing going insane, and worsened in the Army.

If jurors are appalled at the crime, Coombs said, they should be disgusted with the military too. “Why was Sgt. Akbar in the Army?” he asked.

Coombs said Akbar’s unnerving tics and poor performance should have drummed him out of the service long before March 23, 2003. He said if Akbar’s company commander had listened to his subordinates’ concerns about sending Akbar to Kuwait, then Seifert and Stone might still be alive.

“While I am not saying the unit was responsible I am saying their ability not to act had consequences,” Coombs said.

But the jury believed the government, which had mounds of evidence and a confession.

Akbar’s final deployment will occur shortly, when he is transported under armed escort to Fort Leavenworth to await the outcome of his appeals and his fate.

“It is a relief that we close this chapter in our lives,” Terri Seifert said. “I have faith in the military justice system.”

https://www.mcall.com/all-akbardeath042905-story.html

Military Death Row Inmate List

military death row

The Military Death Row is housed at the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. There has not been a Military execution since 1961. The Military method of execution in lethal injection

Military Death Row Inmate List

Mark Fidel Kools aka Hasan K. Akbar

Ronald Gray

Nidal Malik Hasan

Timothy Hennis