Jason Robb Ohio Death Row

jason robb

Jason Robb was sentenced to death by the State of Ohio for a number of prison murder that occurred during a riot. According to court documents Jason Robb would be held responsible for the murders of a prison guard and a fellow inmate. Jason Robb would be convicted and sentenced to death.

Ohio Death Row Inmate List

Jason Robb 2021 Information

Number A308919

DOB 06/15/1967

Gender Male Race White

Admission Date 04/12/1995

Institution Ohio State Penitentiary

Status INCARCERATED

Jason Robb More News

Ohio is keeping six death row inmates at the state’s super-max prison even as most condemned killers are moved to a new death row facility.  

The prisoners staying at the Ohio State Penitentiary in Youngstown include four defendants sentenced to die for their roles in the 1993 Lucasville prison riot.  

Prisons spokesman Carlo LoParo tells the Springfield News-Sun ) the six prisoners are highest security risks, meaning they’re prone to repeated violent actions against prison staff and inmates.  

Ohio has begun moving its death row to the Chillicothe Correctional Institution in southern Ohio.  

The inmates staying in Youngstown are: Jason Dean of ClarkCounty and Edward Lang of Stark County; and Lucasville riot offenders James Were, Keith Lamar, Carlos Sanders, and Jason Robb.  

https://www.wfmj.com/story/16370029/oh-death-row-inmates-remain-at-super-max-prison?clienttype=mobile

Walter Raglin Ohio Death Row

walter raglin

Walter Raglin was sentenced to death by the State of Ohio for robbery murder. According to court documents Walter Raglin would shoot and kill Michael Bany in the process of robbing him. Walter Raglin would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Ohio Death Row Inmate List

Walter Raglin 2021 Information

Number A338114

DOB 06/03/1977

Gender Male Race Black

Admission Date 11/08/1996

Institution Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Status INCARCERATED

Walter Raglin More News

Wayne Powell Ohio Death Row

wayne powell

Wayne Powell was sentenced to death by the State of Ohio for four murders. According to court documents Wayne Powell was in a fight with his girlfriend and would leave the home and return the next day setting the home on fire killing  33-year-old Mary McCollum; her mother, 52-year-old Rose McCollum; her son, four-year-old Jamal McCollum-Myers; and her niece, two-year-old Sanaa Thomas. Wayne Powell would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Ohio Death Row Inmate List

Wayne Powell 2021 Information

Number A559624

DOB 08/04/1965

Gender Male Race Black

Admission Date 10/09/2007

Institution Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Status INCARCERATED

Wayne Powell More News

The Ohio Supreme Court on Wednesday found “overwhelming evidence” to support the murder convictions of a former Toledo man as it upheld his death sentences for the 2006 Toledo house fire that killed four people, including two children.

The court, in weighing the sentence, considered Wayne Powell’s past growing up in a dysfunctional family as well as his history of drug and alcohol abuse, but in the end it found none of it could outweigh what he did.

“Powell set fire to a home in the middle of the night,” wrote Justice Paul Pfeifer. “Eight people were inside the home at the time of the fire, including five children and a disabled woman.

“Powell knew that people were inside the home when he started the fire, because he had been there earlier in the evening,” he wrote. “Four people, including two children, died during the fire. These facts establish a senseless, horrific crime that lacks any mitigating features.”

The fire at 814 St. John Ave. in the early morning of Nov. 11, 2006, killed Powell’s 33-year-old former girlfriend, Mary Rose McCollum; her 4-year-old son, Jamal McCollum-Myers; her 52-year-old ailing mother, Rosemary, and her 3-year-old niece, Sanaa’ Thomas.

The Lucas County jury had agreed with the prosecution that Powell, now 46, followed through with prior threats to burn the house where he once lived by pouring gasoline through a crack in a door and then setting the blaze while the victims and several others slept inside.

The court did not accept Powell’s arguments of ineffectiveness of counsel and most other issues that his attorneys raised.

But it did agree that several errors had occurred, including the trial court’s decision to allow the jury to be shown a videotape in which Isaac Powell told police his brother had admitted to pouring gasoline onto the side of the house. Isaac Powell testified during the trial that he couldn’t recall such a statement. Powell’s attorneys had maintained that the video was the last thing the jury saw before beginning deliberations and again during deliberations when it asked a question.

But in such areas where the court agreed errors had occurred, it found them to be “harmless errors” that wouldn’t have changed the outcome of the case.

“There was overwhelming evidence of guilt,” said Lucas County Assistant Prosecutor David Cooper. “We were able to preserve the conviction and sentence despite harmless error.”

Among that “overwhelming evidence” were phone records showing a string of 88 calls Wayne Powell made to Mary Rose McCollum from two different phones over several hours, calls that abruptly ended about the time of the fire. Police also discovered gasoline on his clothes.

Mr. Cooper said the case was deserving of the death penalty.

“Four people dead in a horrible way,” he said. “Four innocent people, two of them children.”

Powell is on death row at Chillicothe Correctional Institution. He has other state and federal appeals routes available to him, but first his attorneys are expected to ask this court to reconsider this decision.

“We’re in the process of studying this decision,” said one of his attorneys, Spiros Cocoves. “We do note, however, that the court acknowledged a significant number of errors by the trial court, but found them harmless. We disagree with that.”

https://www.firehouse.com/community-risk/news/10729225/ohio-high-court-upholds-murder-convictions-against-wayne-powell

Mark Pickens Ohio Death Row

mark pickens

Mark Pickens was sentenced to death by the State of Ohio for a triple murder. According to court documents the victim reported to police that she had been sexually assaulted by Mark Pickens. Pickens would go to the woman’s house and murder her and her two young children. Mark Pickens would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Ohio Death Row Inmate List

Mark Pickens 2021 Information

Number A635147

DOB 12/05/1989

Gender Male Race Black

Admission Date 07/16/2010

Institution Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Status INCARCERATED

Mark Pickens More News

Around 10:30 a.m. on May 31, 2009, Noelle went to Pickens’s residence at Gateway Plaza Apartments in Cincinnati. About an hour and a half later, Noelle stumbled into the hallway, apparently pushed out, her pants below her hips. Noelle went to a neighboring apartment, pounded on the door, and screamed for help.

{¶ 6} Darlene Tucker lived in that apartment. Tucker testified that Noelle beat on her door, screaming, “[P]lease, help me, let me in before he gets me.” Tucker opened the door and let Noelle inside. Noelle was hysterical and said that her boyfriend had a gun and had raped her. Tucker said that Noelle’s hair was messy, she was sweating profusely, and she kept pulling up her pants around the waist. At Noelle’s behest, Tucker called 9–1–1.

{¶ 7} At 12:30 p.m., Officer Marian Jenkins of the Cincinnati police met with Noelle at Tucker’s apartment. Noelle said that she had been raped by Mark Pickens and described what happened. Noelle said she had gone to Pickens’s apartment to have sex with him. But when Pickens started acting “funny,” she decided that she did not want to have sex. Noelle told Pickens, “[N]o, no, I am not staying. I don’t want to.” Noelle said that Pickens then pulled out a gun and laid it on the bed. Noelle said that they then had sex. Afterwards, Pickens left the building but Noelle did not know where he went. Noelle was then transported to the police department.

{¶ 8} At 1:20 p.m. on May 31, Detectives Chris Schroder and Stephanie Broxterman conducted an audio-taped interview of Noelle. Noelle stated that she went to Pickens’s apartment at his invitation. According to Noelle, they talked at first and then started wrestling around. But he started playing rough and she told him to stop. Noelle told Pickens that she was going to leave, and Pickens told her, “I was fixing to get some pussy.” Noelle repeated that she “didn’t want to do it” and wanted to leave. Pickens replied, “[Y]ou ain’t about to  leave. We about to do it.” Noelle said that Pickens then took a gun out of the dresser drawer and placed it on top of the dresser. He then started taking off Noelle’s clothes.

{¶ 9} Noelle stated that she told Pickens that she needed to use the bathroom. But Pickens followed Noelle there and forced her back into the bedroom. Pickens then resumed removing her clothes, got on top of her, and had vaginal sex with her. When they finished, Noelle said that Pickens “started hitting me around.” With the gun in his hand, he told Noelle, “I am going to kill us both and take us out of our misery.” {¶ 10} When Noelle told Pickens that she was calling the police, Pickens tried to take her phone from her. He pulled her hair, choked her, and punched her until he got the phone. Pickens then pushed Noelle into the hallway and continued hitting her. Noelle said that she grabbed the phone from him, thinking that it was hers, but she later discovered that she had taken Pickens’s phone.

{¶ 11} Noelle stated that she and Pickens had exchanged text messages since the rape. Noelle said that Pickens asked her why she had called the police and asked her if she was “going to try to set [him] up.” Noelle also said that Pickens’s mother had called her after the rape and told her that Pickens knew that Noelle had been with the police.

{¶ 12} During follow-up questioning, Noelle said that Pickens had hit her approximately 25 times and struck her in the face three times. Noelle said that she had been wearing only a t-shirt when she was pushed into the hallway, and she got dressed inside the neighbor’s apartment.

{¶ 13} During the interview, Noelle agreed to call Pickens and confront him about the rape. During the recorded phone call, Noelle confronted Pickens and asked, “Why did you have sex with me when you know that I didn’t want you to?” Pickens responded, “I didn’t have sex with you.” Despite continued accusations, Pickens said repeatedly that he had not had sex with Noelle or hit her. During the conversation, Pickens said, “You * * * put a warrant out on me.” Noelle replied, “No, they wanted me to talk to them but I didn’t. I love you.” But Pickens said, “You was talking to them. You told them everything.”

{¶ 14} Following the police interview, Noelle went to the hospital for a rape exam. Kathleen Ferrara, a sexual-assault nurse examiner, examined Noelle. Noelle told Ferrara that she went to Pickens’s apartment because he owed her money. Noelle said that Pickens started playing rough and insisted on having sex. Noelle told him that she did not want to have sex, and he started hitting and choking her. Noelle said, “I closed my legs together, but he pried them open. I was crying, telling him to stop.” He then started “doing it” to her. {¶ 15} Ferrara’s examination showed that Noelle’s lip was swollen and she had a bite mark on the right upper lip. There were also lacerations on her neck that were consistent with scratching. Ferrara also observed a laceration and bite mark on Noelle’s chest, a laceration on her shoulder, a bite mark on her right thigh, and bruises on her left inner calf and left knee. Ferrara testified that these were fresh injuries that were consistent with Noelle’s statement that Pickens had pried her legs open. Noelle suffered a laceration to her right inner labia that was approximately three centimeters long and a laceration to the left inner labia that was approximately two centimeters in length. Ferrara testified that these injuries were “consistent with someone that is not * * * having consensual sex.”

{¶ 16} At 10:44 a.m. on June 1, 2009, Schroder and Broxterman went to Pickens’s apartment to question him. Schroder knocked on Pickens’s door and received no answer. Schroder then wrote “please call me” on the back of a business card and left the card in the door.

C. Events between Noelle’s rape and her murder

{¶ 17} Crystal Lewis, Noelle’s friend and Sha’railyn Wright’s mother, testified that on the afternoon of May 31, she talked to Noelle on the phone. Noelle said that she was at the hospital because “Mark raped me” and “hit me” and left “marks  and bruises all over my body.” Noelle also thought that Pickens had her house keys because she left them at his apartment.

{¶ 18} Gwendolyn Washington, Noelle’s mother, testified that on the afternoon of May 31, she was with her son, Derrick Lee. During that time, she received a text message from Noelle’s phone stating, “This MARK I DO NOT WANNA BE WIT YO DAUGHTER.” Derrick testified that on that same afternoon, Noelle called him. Noelle was crying and kept repeating that “he raped me.” Noelle also talked to her mother and told her that Pickens had raped her and that she was at the hospital.

{¶ 19} Tamika Washington, Noelle’s sister, testified that on May 31, Noelle called screaming, “[H]e beat me up, he beat me up,” and hung up. Tamika then called Noelle’s phone number, and a male answered. He stated, “You fat bitch, quit calling the phone,” and hung up. At that point, Tamika started sending text messages to that phone number. Tamika testified that one of the return text messages stated, “Noelle was only good for sucking his dick, he didn’t care about her, the only thing she did after he hurt her feelings she would run to me and cry to me.” Tamika then called him and said, “You are going to jail, you are going to jail.” He responded, “That’s okay, because if I go to jail, then I am going to fuck her up.” He then hung up. {¶ 20} Jonda Palmer, a girlfriend of Pickens, testified that around 5:00 p.m. on May 31, Pickens came to her home. Pickens said that someone had accused him of rape, and he was angry. Pickens then asked Palmer if she would join with some other girls to beat up his accuser. Palmer refused. Palmer testified that when she gave Pickens a hug, she felt an object around his waist. She lifted up his shirt and saw a gun in his waistband. Palmer testified that after he left, they exchanged text messages, and Pickens said, “I feel like killing someone.”

D. Noelle, Sha’railyn, and Anthony murdered

{¶ 21} Tanisha Scott, Noelle’s cousin, testified that on the afternoon of June 1, 2009, she went to Noelle’s home, and Noelle, Anthony, and Sha’railyn were there. Noelle told Tanisha that Pickens had raped her and that she was afraid of him. She could not find her keys and said that Pickens had them. Tanisha left around 8:00 or 9:00 p.m.

{¶ 22} Ronell Harris, an acquaintance of Noelle, testified that at 11:40 p.m. on June 1, he saw Noelle talking to a man outside the building where she lived. Harris asked Noelle if everything was all right, because he had never seen Noelle outside so late. Noelle said everything was fine. Harris also asked where her children were, and she said that they were upstairs. Before leaving, Harris told Noelle, “[I]f you need me, just call me.” Harris testified that he later saw Pickens’s photo on TV and recognized him as the man who had been talking to Noelle.

{¶ 23} Cynthia Evans testified that on the evening of June 1, she was visiting a friend outside a church across the street from Noelle’s apartment building. Evans stated that she saw a woman with a baby arguing with a man across the street. Although Evans could not hear their conversation, she saw that the woman was crying and wiping her eyes, and the man was animated and looked mad. Evans saw them enter the apartment building. Evans testified that she heard loud music and later heard “two pops; boom, boom” and then “another pop, pop.” She then heard “another pop, pop,” and her friend said, “that’s gunfire, Cindy.” Evans stated that the music stopped, and it became quiet. {¶ 24} Evans testified that shortly thereafter, a woman came down the street and entered the apartment. She then came outside and screamed, “[M]y baby, my baby.” Evans asked the woman what was the matter, and she said that her baby was not breathing. Evans called 9–1–1, entered the apartment, and found that Noelle and the two children were dead.

{¶ 25} Police spoke to Lewis about the events of that evening. Lewis testified that Sha’railyn stayed at Noelle’s home. At 11:12 p.m., Noelle texted her, saying, “Bitch I jus woke up mark was comin thru the kitchen.” Lewis texted back, “Wher he at now[?]” At 11:37 p.m., Noelle texted, “He gone.” At 11:40 p.m.,  Lewis texted, “I am about to come get her i am worry.” Noelle replied, “I’m finn go back to sleep.” At 11:42 p.m., Lewis texted, “Na i dont want her to be in da middle of that.” Noelle replied, “Of wat. He gone.” At 11:44 p.m., Lewis texted, “i dont give a fuck if he is gone he can come right back n yall don’t need to be there.” At 11:48 p.m., Lewis texted, “On my way now.” At 11:49 p.m. Noelle texted, “K.” This was the last text message Lewis received from Noelle.

{¶ 26} Lewis testified that she arrived at Noelle’s building about five or ten minutes after leaving home. Lewis entered the building and found Noelle’s door halfway open. Lewis went inside Noelle’s apartment and found Noelle sitting on the couch with Anthony in her arms and a cell phone in her hand. They were both dead. When she saw her daughter on the floor, Lewis ran outside, screaming, “He killed my baby. My baby’s dead.”

{¶ 27} At 12:15 a.m. on June 2, Cincinnati police officers arrived at Noelle’s apartment. Noelle was found slumped over on the couch with a baby in her arms and a cell phone in her hand. Sha’railyn was found lying near the TV in the same room. All three victims had been shot in the head and were pronounced dead.

https://casetext.com/case/state-v-pickens-47

Kerry Perez Ohio Death Row

kerry perez

Kerry Perez was sentenced to death by the State of Ohio for a robbery murder. According to court documents Kerry Perez would enter the bar Do Drop Inn Bar and in the process of robbing it would shoot and kill the owner Ronald Johnson. Kerry Perez would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Ohio Death Row Inmate List

Kerry Perez 2021 Information

Number A509017

DOB 07/02/1965

Gender Male Race White

Admission Date 12/13/2005

Institution Warren Correctional Institution

Status INCARCERATED

Kerry Perez More News

The Supreme Court of Ohio today affirmed the death sentence of Kerry Perez for the aggravated murder of Ronald Johnson, who was shot and killed during a March 2003 robbery of a Springfield bar and its patrons.

Perez, who admitted his role in the robbery and shooting, was found guilty of two death penalty specifications: 1) that he killed Johnson during the commission of a violent felony, (aggravated robbery) and 2) that Johnson was killed as part of a course of conduct in which Perez had earlier attempted to kill the owner of a drive-through liquor store when the owner resisted during a robbery attempt.

The Court’s 6-1 decision, authored by Justice Robert R. Cupp, overruled all 13 allegations of legal and procedural error by the trial court that were raised by Perez as grounds to overturn his murder conviction or reduce his death sentence to a term of life imprisonment.

Among the arguments rejected by the Court was a claim by defense attorneys that the trial court should not have admitted into evidence tape recordings of conversations between Perez and his wife, Debra, that were made with Debra’s consent but without her husband’s knowledge during her visits with him at the Clark County jail. Perez contended that admitting secret recordings of what he believed to be confidential communications with his spouse into evidence violated the marital-communications privilege set forth in R.C. 2945.42 and denied him due process of law.

Justice Cupp wrote: “R.C. 2945.42 provides: ‘Husband or wife shall not testify concerning a communication made by one to the other, or act done by either in the presence of the other, during coverture, unless the communication was made or act done in the known presence or hearing of a third person competent to be a witness …’  When Debra testified at trial, the prosecution did not ask her to repeat any statement by Perez … Thus, Perez’s jailhouse conversations with Debra were introduced only through the tape recordings. That circumstance requires us to answer the following question: Does R.C. 2945.42 bar only a spouse’s testimony concerning marital communications, or does it also bar the introduction of tape recordings of such communications, even where the spouse does not testify?”

“Perez contends that admitting the taped conversations was the ‘equivalent’ of allowing Debra to testify to the content of the conversations and was thus equally impermissible under R.C. 2945.42. But R.C. 2945.42 specifies that a ‘[h]usband or wife shall not testify concerning a communication made by one to the other … .’  Thus, on its face, the statute does no more than preclude a spouse from testifying to the other spouse’s statements.” 

Justice Cupp noted that courts in some states have interpreted their privilege statutes broadly to bar third-parties from introducing evidence of spousal communications that was obtained from or with the help of a defendant’s collaborating spouse. However, he cited with approval a Michigan Supreme Court decision,  People v. Fischer (1993), that interpreted statutory language barring a spouse from being “examined” with respect to spousal communications to preclude in-court testimony by a spouse as a sworn witness, but not to preclude introduction of marital communications into evidence through other means.

“We agree with the Michigan Supreme Court’s analysis in Fisher,” wrote Justice Cupp. “‘In construing a statute, we may not add or delete words.’  R.C. 2945.42 states that a ‘[h]usband or wife shall not testify concerning a communication made by one to the other  …’  Like the phrase ‘be examined’ in Michigan’s statute, the word ‘testify’ in R.C. 2945.42 clearly precludes the spouse’s testimony.  Just as clearly, it does not preclude ‘introduction of the marital communication through other means.’ Our holding also accords with the fundamental principle of construing privileges narrowly. Privileges are to be construed narrowly because they impede the search for truth and contravene the principle that the public has a right to everyone’s evidence. … Because the jailhouse conversations were not introduced by way of Debra’s testimony, we hold that their admission did not violate R.C. 2945.42.”

Justice Cupp’s opinion was joined by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer and Justices Evelyn Lundberg Stratton, Maureen O’Connor, Terrence O’Donnell and Judith Ann Lanzinger.

Justice Paul E. Pfeifer entered a separate opinion in which he concurred with the majority’s affirmance of Perez’s death sentence based on the felony murder specification; but dissented from the majority finding of guilt on the “course of conduct” death penalty specification.  “In this case,” he wrote, “the murder of Ronald Johnson occurred several months after the shooting at the Beverage Oasis. Although both incidents involved a robbery and the use of masks and guns to effect the robbery, little else binds them. One establishment was a retail store, the other a bar; one shooting was at an owner, the other of a customer; one involved Perez chasing employees, the other did not; one involved an armed victim who shot first, the other did not; even the guns used in the two crimes were different. … In short, there are no particularized facts that suggest that the first and second incidents were part of a course of conduct, especially when the eight-month gap is considered. There is no factual link  ‘of time, location, murder weapon, or cause of death.’ The course-of-conduct death specification in this case should not have been charged, should not have been presented to the jury, and should not be affirmed by this court.”

Justice Pfeifer also disagreed with the majority’s interpretation of the marital communications privilege, stating that in his view barring direct testimony by Debra Perez about her husband’s statements to her but admitting into evidence secret tape recordings she made of those same conversations “eviscerates the intent behind the privilege and is in some ways worse than the admission of testimony. If a spouse testifies, the defendant at least has a right to cross-examine.”