Angelina Rodriguez Women On Death Row

Angelina Rodriguez Women On Death Row

Angelina Rodriguez is sitting on death row in California for the murder of her husband. According to court documents Angelina Rodriguez married the victim and within months she realized that it was a mistake. Rodriguez would take out a quarter of a million dollar life insurance and plotted on ways to kill him. Angelina tried a number of methods including poison but finally she killed him by adding antifreeze to his gatoraid. Rodriguez at first got away with it but because the death was ruled unconclusive she could not collect the life insurance so she pushed for more tests and in the end they figured out the truth and she was arrested, convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of her husband Frank Rodriguez.

Angelina Rodriguz 2021 Information

Inmate NameRODRIGUEZ, ANGELINA
CDCR NumberX02712
Age51
Admission Date01/22/2004
Current LocationCentral California Women’s Facility
Location LinkDirections
Parole Eligible Date (Month/Year)CONDEMNED

Angelina Rodriguez Other News

Angelina Rodriguez met her husband Frank, a special education teacher, while working at a camp in San Luis Obispo, California. The couple married in April 2000. It was Angelina’s fourth marriage.[1] Prosecutors argue that within months of the marriage, Rodriguez took out a $250,000 life insurance policy on Frank and began plotting to kill him. She was suspected of poisoning Frank’s tea with oleander leaves, loosening the gas cap on their clothes dryer, and finally adulterating her husband’s Gatorade with antifreeze. Frank Rodriguez died on September 9, 2000. His death was initially ruled undetermined, but the lack of a cause of death meant that Angelina Rodriguez could not get a death certificate or Frank’s life insurance. She pushed for more testing, and those results showed that he had been intentionally poisoned. Angelina was arrested for murder in Paso Robles, California in February 2001

Angelina Rodriguez More News

The California Supreme Court upheld the death sentence for a former Montebello woman who killed her husband in 2000 by putting anti-freeze in his Gatorade in order to collect his $250,000 life insurance policy.

The high court ruled Thursday that Angelina Rodriguez received a fair trial in 2004. It said if any errors occurred during her trial, they were harmless.

Rodriguez was sentenced to death on Jan. 12, 2004 for poisoning her fourth husband, 41-year-old Jose Francisco “Frank’ Rodriguez, by giving him drinks with oleander and anti-freeze. According to court documents. Rodriguez wanted to collect on a life insurance she had insisted they take out nearly two months before he died. She was the primary beneficiary.

A jury convicted her of first degree murder with the special circumstances of murder by administering poison and murder for financial gain. She was also found guilty of attempting to dissuade a witness.

But jurors deadlocked on a charge of attempting to have the same witness killed by a fellow inmate who was released from custody before the trial began.

Detectives said Rodriguez used oleander extract to sicken her husband, then finished him off with antifreeze while supposedly nursing him back to health.

On Sept. 9, 2000, Montebello police responded to a call at the couple’s home in the 800 block of Marconi Street in Montebello and found Frank Rodriguez lying facedown on a carpet in a bedroom. The officer testified that Rodriguez’s crying “seemed rehearsed or kind of forced.”

Telephone records showed Rodriguez called the insurance company just hours after her husband’s body was removed from the home.

She had tried to kill him before by loosening the connection on a gas dryer in the garage, according to court documents. But Frank Rodriguez smelled the gas and called a repairman.

The couple met in February 2000 while both were working for Angel Gate Academy in San Luis Obispo. They got married in April. Frank Rodriguez later landed a teaching job at Los Angeles Unified and the couple moved to Montebello.

Detectives said shortly after buying the life insurance, Frank Rodriguez began to complain of feeling ill.

Rodriguez told a friend how unhappy she was with her husband. When the friend asked why doesn’t Rodriguez divorce this husband like her other husbands, she was told Frank Rodriguez has a life insurance policy.

The friend and her mother also told Rodriguez a story about a woman who had tried to kill her husband by giving him “oleander tea.”

Prosecutors believe Rodriguez used oleander leaves from a neighbor’s shrub to sicken her husband, but the poison did not kill him. She later heard about antifreeze.

The same friend and her boyfriend mentioned a dog who bit the friend’s son. The boyfriend at one point said they could just soak some hotdogs in antifreeze and throw it over the fence.

When Rodriguez asked why, she was told about the toxic effects of antifreeze and that veterinarians warn people to keep it away from pets because it has a sweet taste.

Investigators said Rodriguez pressured the friend not to testify about their discussions of antifreeze as a poison.

At the penalty phase of her trial, the prosecution presented evidence that Rodriguez killed her 13-month-old daughter in Sept. 18, 1993 in Lompoc.

Alicia Nicole Fuller’s death had been blamed on a defective pacifier when the nipple part of the pacifier was found in her throat.

The prosecution said Rodriguez won more than $200,000 in a settlement after she sued the maker of the pacifier. According to court documents, she insured Alicia’s life for $50,000 two months before the child died. Rodriguez was the primary beneficiary. The insurance company paid her $50,000 plus interest.

Rodriguez wasn’t charged by Santa Barbara County authorities for the death of Alicia. She has also denied killing her daughter.

Twenty of the state’s 747 inmates on death row are women. Executions have been on hold in California since 2006 because of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of California’s death penalty.

https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-xpm-2014-feb-20-la-me-ln-court-murder-20140220-story.html

Frequently Asked Questions

Angelina Rodriguez Photos

Angelina Rodriguez
Angelina Rodriguez 1
Angelina Rodriguez 2

Angelina Rodriguez FAQ

Angelina Rodriguez 2021

Angelina Rodriguez is currently incarcerated at the Central California Women’s Facility the home of California Death Row For Women

Why Is Angelina Rodriguez On Death Row

Angelina Rodriguez was currently incarcerated at the Central California Women’s Facility the home of California Death Row For Women

Sandi Nieves Women On Death Row

Sandi Nieves Women On Death Row

Sandi Nieves is on California death row for the murders of her four children. It seemed that Sandi Nieves was mad at her estranged husband and in order to prevent him to get custody of her five children she killed her four children by placing them all in sleeping bags in a room then setting the house on fire. The fifth child was able to escape the burning home suffering smoke inhalation. Sandi Nieves would ultimately be tried for all four murders plus the arson and would be convicted on all counts and would be sentenced to death

Sandi Nieves 2021 Information

Inmate NameNIEVES, SANDI DAWN
CDCR NumberW87025
Age55
Admission Date10/17/2000
Current LocationCentral California Women’s Facility
Location LinkDirections
Parole Eligible Date (Month/Year)CONDEMNED

Sandi Nieves Other News

As 16-year-old David Nieves took to the stand, he glanced at the woman he used to look up to.

His mother Sandi Nieves, then 36, was on trial for the most unforgivable crime.

Sandi Nieves was accused of murdering David’s four younger sisters and attempting to kill him

Nikolet, 12, Rashel, 11, Jaqlene, 7, and Kristl, 5, had all died from smoke inhalation during a house fire.

And now their own mother stood accused of starting the blaze deliberately.

But why would Sandi Nieves want her own children dead? And what had pushed her to carry out such a heinous crime?

It was reported that Sandi Nieves was born and raised in a dysfunctional environment.

She was married twice. First to Fernando Nieves, with whom she had David, Nikolet and Rashel.



After a three-year marriage, the couple divorced and Sandi Nieves had custody of their three children.

In the years that followed, Nieves married her second husband, David Folden. It was reported he was also her former stepdad.

He adopted her children, then the couple went on to have Jaqlene and Kristl.

But Sandi Nieves ’ second marriage didn’t last, either.

After splitting from Folden after eight years, she reportedly started dating a much younger man.

But, again, things didn’t work out and he left her.

Around the same time, Nieves was fighting hard to hang onto her kids in an ugly child-support battle with Folden.

That, coupled with the string of failed relationships, made Nieves a bitter and angry woman.

Scorned, she wanted to hurt her exes. And she decided the best way to do that was through their children.

So, in July 1998, Nieves gathered the kids in the kitchen and told them they were having a slumber party.

The kitchen had a TV and video player. The kids had never slept in there before, and found the idea exciting.

They watched films, then nodded off in sleeping bags.

While they slept, Nieves poured gas on the carpets and set them alight.

When the children began waking up gagging from the smoke, Sandi Nieves ordered them to stay where they were.

By the time firefighters responded to a call at the house, the four girls were tucked up in sleeping bags, dead.

Sandi and David were rushed to hospital for treatment for smoke inhalation. Both survived.

But poor David was now an only child. And his own twisted mother was to blame.

It seemed she’d killed her children for no other reason than to hurt her exes.

Nieves Found Guilty

Frequently Asked Questions

Sandi Nieves Photos

Sandi Nieves

Sandy Nieves Death Sentenced Overturned

 The California Supreme Court on Monday reversed the death penalty for a woman who killed her four young daughters and tried to kill her son by setting their house on fire 23 years ago.

The justices unanimously upheld the first-degree murder, attempted murder and arson convictions of 57-year-old Sandi Dawn Nieves in the deaths of daughters Nikolet Amber Nieves, Rashel Hollie Nieves, Kristl Dawn Folden, and Jaqlene Marie Folden.

But they overturned her death sentence “due to the trial court’s misconduct.”

The judge was frustrated that the defense lawyer kept violating court procedures despite repeated warnings and sanctions, and also openly doubted the credibility of defense witnesses, the justices found.

“Ultimately, the trial judge’s conspicuous disdain for defense counsel and witnesses, and his repeated references to their improper or untrustworthy conduct, lent credence to the prosecution’s argument that defendant was manipulative and deceitful,” Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye wrote.

“These were the very characteristics the prosecution highlighted to justify the death penalty.”

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge L. Jeffrey Wiatt killed himself in 2005 after he was questioned by detectives on an unrelated matter.

Nieves was one of 23 women on California’s death row, and is housed at the Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla. There are 682 men on the nation’s largest death row, though California has not executed anyone since 2006 and Gov. Gavin Newsom has imposed a moratorium.

Nieves called firefighters July 1, 1998, to report her house was on fire. The blaze was out by the time they arrived and they found her sitting in the living room with her 14-year-old son, covered in soot.

Her our daughters, ages 12, 11, 7, and 5 were lying on sleeping bags in the kitchen, all dead of smoke inhalation. Gasoline had been poured and ignited in the hallway and bedrooms, and the oven was open with burned items inside.

Nieves was upset over the end of a relationship and had a stormy past with the fathers of her children, according to the court.

Her son and two oldest daughters were from her first marriage, the two younger girls from her second, and a third man had just broken up with her for the second time after learning she was pregnant. She had threatened suicide and had an abortion a week before the fire.

In a note to her second husband postmarked the day of the fire, she wrote “Now you don’t have to support any of us!” She sent a letter to the third man saying that “I can’t live without you in my life.”

Nieves testified that she didn’t remember sending the letters and “thought she dreamed about holding a lighter and seeing flames” until she realized she had scorched hair on the back of her hand.

Defense experts testified that she had taken a combination of drugs that could cause her to act while she was “basically unconscious,” said one, or in delirium, said another. Prosecution witnesses disputed those conclusions.

“Absent the trial judge’s persistent, disparaging remarks, a juror might have viewed these circumstances with greater sympathy and concluded the crime was a tragedy lacking the moral culpability to warrant death,” Cantil-Sakauye wrote.

“A juror might also have given greater weight to defendant’s remorse and evidence she had been a loving mother to conclude that life in prison, confronted each day with what she had done to her children, was a fitting punishment.”

The justices rejected multiple other defense claims of trial error, including that the jury was not properly selected or screened to consider a death penalty case involving the four young children.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office did not respond to a request for comment.

https://www.courttv.com/news/death-penalty-overturned-for-california-mom-who-killed-4/

Cherie Lash-Rhoades Women On Death Row

Cherie Lash Rhoades Women On Death Row

Cherie Lash-Rhoades is on death row in California for a mass shooting that took place in 2014. According to police reports Lash-Rhoades opened fire at an office building in Cedarville Rancheria. It seemed that Cherie Rhoades was upset that she was recently let go and was under investigation for fraud. Rhoades would shoot and kill four people including her own brother, niece and nephew. Rhoades would attempt to kill more people however she ran out of ammunition

Cherie Rhoades 2021 Information

Inmate NameRHOADES, CHERIE LOUISE
CDCR NumberWF7290
Age49
Admission Date04/20/2017
Current LocationCentral California Women’s Facility
Location LinkDirections
Parole Eligible Date (Month/Year)CONDEMNED

Cherie Lash Rhoades Other News

Cherie Lash-Rhoades, the woman convicted of killing four people in a mass shooting in Alturas in 2014, was sentenced to death Monday morning by a Modoc County judge.

The judge sentenced Lash-Rhoades to death for the four people she murdered and 150 years to life for the attempted murder cases and special allegations. Lash-Rhoades will not be eligible for custody credits. The judge also ordered that Cherie Lash-Rhoades pay $64,000 in restitution.

Lash-Rhoades was found guilty in December of 2016 on four counts of first-degree murder and two counts of attempted murder. The jury recommended the death penalty. According to Modoc County District Attorney Jordan Funk, this is the first death penalty case he knows of in Modoc County.

Lash-Rhoades shot six people at the Cedarville Rancheria Tribal Office in Alturas, ultimately killing four on February 20, 2014. Officials said at least one of the injured was also attacked with a butcher knife after Lash-Rhoades ran out of ammunition.

Officials added a witness was able to escape the office and run, covered in blood, to the Alturas Police Station where they sounded the alarm.

Police said when they arrived, Cherie Lash-Rhoades was outside the building, running with a knife in her hands, but was quickly subdued.

The four victims were identified as Rurik Davis, 50, Lash-Rhoades’ brother and tribal chairman; Angel Penn, 19, Lash-Rhoades’ niece; Glenn Calonico, 30, Lash-Rhoades’ nephew; and Sheila Russo, 47.

Frequently Asked Questions

Cherie Lash-Rhoades Photos

Cherie Lash Rhoades

Cherie Lash-Rhoades FAQ

Cherie Lash Rhoades 2021

Cherie Lash Rhoades is currently incarcerated at the Central California Women’s Facility home of California Death Row For Women

Why Is Cherie Lash Rhoades On Death Row

Cherie Lash Rhoades is on death row for murdering four people

Michelle Lyn Michaud Women On Death Row

Michelle Lyn Michaud Women On Death Row

Michelle Lyn Michaud is on California death row for helping her boyfriend kidnap, rape and murder a young woman. According to court documents Michelle Lyn Michaud and James Daveggio would kidnap the victim as she was walking to work. The two would sexually assault the woman with hot curling irons before ultimately killing her. The murderous pair would be charged and convicted on an assortment of charges including kidnapping, sexual assault, torture and murder. The pair would be sentenced to death

Michelle Lyn Michaud 2021

Inmate NameMICHAUD, MICHELLE LYNN
CDCR NumberW96070
Age60
Admission Date09/26/2002
Current LocationCentral California Women’s Facility
Location LinkDirections
Parole Eligible Date (Month/Year)CONDEMNED

Michelle Lyn Michaud Other News

The California Supreme Court Thursday unanimously upheld the death penalties of a Sacramento couple for the murder, kidnapping and rape of a 22-year-old Pleasanton woman in 1997.

James Daveggio, 57, and Michelle Lyn Michaud, 59, were given the death penalties in Alameda County Superior Court in 2002 for kidnapping Vanessa Lei Samson on the morning of Dec. 2, 1997, raping her with modified curling irons and murdering her by strangulation with a rope.

During the sentencing, Superior Court Judge Larry Goodman called the murder “vile, cruel, senseless, depraved, brutal, evil and vicious.”

The couple abducted Samson into Michaud’s green Dodge minivan as she walked to her job at an insurance company and assaulted her during a trip to Lake Tahoe.

Samson’s body was found two days later, in the snow on an embankment along state Highway 88 in Alpine County.

Daveggio and Michaud were also convicted in the 2002 trial of the oral copulation of Daveggio’s daughter, then 16, and the daughter’s friend, then 17, on Nov. 3 and 27, 1997.

Prosecutors alleged the crimes were part of a spree of “utter depravity” in which the two sexually assaulted a series of girls and young women during their 13-month relationship in 1996 and 1997.

Goodman allowed prosecutors to present testimony during the trial from four other alleged victims of 1997 assaults that were not charged in the Alameda County case, but he excluded evidence of alleged sexual attacks on 11 other victims whom prosecutors had hoped to bring to the stand.

Two of the alleged victims who did testify were Michelle Lyn Michaud’s daughter and a friend of the daughter, who were 12 and 13 when they were allegedly forced into sexual acts by the couple in the fall of 1997.

Another victim who testified was a then-20-year-old Reno college student who was kidnapped and assaulted on Sept. 29, 1997. Like Samson, she was abducted into the van as she walked by the side of a road.

Although that case was not charged as part of the Alameda County trial, Daveggio and Michelle Lyn Michaud were separately convicted of kidnapping in federal court in Reno in 1999.

The two were arrested by the FBI on Dec. 3, 1997, the day after Samson’s murder, on kidnapping charges in the Reno case. After being convicted in the federal case, they were transferred to Alameda County for trial on the state charges.

In a 98-page decision, the state high court rejected a series of appeal arguments, including the defendants’ claim that evidence from the uncharged cases should not have been allowed.

The court said the testimony was admissible to show the distinctive characteristics of the couple’s motive and methods.

Justice Leondra Kruger, the author of the court’s opinion, wrote, “The evidence concerning the uncharged incidents shed light on whether Daveggio and Michelle Lyn Michaud had a propensity to commit acts of sexual misconduct.”

The couple’s direct appeal to the California Supreme Court was the first step in the death penalty appeal process. They can continue appeals through habeas corpus petitions in the federal court system.

Frequently Asked Questions

Michelle Lyn Michaud Photos

Michelle Lyn Michaud
Michelle Lyn Michaud 1
Michelle Lyn Michaud 2

 

Michelle Lyn Michaud FAQ

Michelle Lyn Michaud 2021

Michelle Lyn Michaud is currently incarcerated at the Central California Women’s Facility home of the California Death Row For Women

Why Is Michelle Lyn Michaud On Death Row

Michelle Lyn Michaud was convicted of the sexual assault and murder of a woman

Tanya Jaime Nelson Women On Death Row

Tanya Jaime Nelson Women On Death Row

Tanya Jaime Nelson went to a fortune teller in California and when her fortune did not come true she would murder the woman and her daughter. According to court documents Nelson was in California and went to the fortune teller to find out if her business would succeed if she relocated her business from North Carolina to California so she did and the business failed so she wanted revenge.

Tanya Jaime Nelson 2021 Information

Inmate NameNELSON, TANYA JAIME
CDCR NumberWA4501
Age55
Admission Date05/03/2010
Current LocationCentral California Women’s Facility
Location LinkDirections
Parole Eligible Date (Month/Year)CONDEMNED

Tanya Jaime Nelson Other News

SANTA ANA – A North Carolina woman sat motionless in court Tuesday as she was convicted of murdering a Westminster fortune teller and her daughter in April 2005 after she received a fortune that did not come true.

The seven-woman, five-man jury deliberated for about a day before finding Tanya Jaime Nelson, 45, guilty of two counts of first-degree murder for the stabbing deaths of Ha “Jade” Smith, 52, and Anita Vo, 23, plus several “special circumstances” that could lead to a death sentence.

Superior Court Judge Frank F. Fasel scheduled a penalty hearing to begin Tuesday. If the same jury recommends that Tanya Jaime Nelson be executed for the double murders, she would become only the second woman to get the death penalty in Orange County history.

Smith’s sisters, Nicky Phan, of Vancouver, Canada, and Huong Kempf, of St. Louis. Missouri, watched the verdicts in the courtroom gallery with tears brimming in their eyes. Later, they wept as they hugged Deputy District Attorney Sonia Balleste.

Co-defendant Phillipe Zamora, 55, also of North Carolina, pleaded guilty last year to two counts of first-degree murder and agreed to cooperate with authorities in the prosecution of Tanya Jaime Nelson. He will be sentenced to 50 years to life in prison later in the year.

He testified for two days through a Vietnamese interpreter and told the jury that he joined Nelson on the murderous mission after Tanya Jaime Nelson promised to introduce him to potential gay sex partners in Orange County.

Zamora said he was present in Smith’s home on April 21, 2005, when Nelson began stabbing Anita Vo, prompting Smith to scream. He testified that he panicked when Tanya Jaime Nelson yelled at him, “Kill her! Kill her! Don’t let her scream!”

He said he picked up a wine bottle and hit Smith in the shoulder to silence her before he wrestled her to the ground and stabbed her repeatedly with two knives.

“It happened so quickly,” Zamora told the jury. “I didn’t know what to do … I didn’t want her to scream.”

Zamora also testified that Nelson told him on the return flight to North Carolina that Smith was targeted for death because she gave Tanya Jaime Nelson a fortune that did not come true.

Tanya Jaime Nelson felt cheated because Smith predicted for Nelson that her business would do well if she relocated from Orange County to North Carolina, Zamora said, but instead Nelson ended up her losing her house.

Smith “did the fortune-telling for her and it was not accurate,” Zamora testified, and therefore Tanya Jaime Nelson felt that Smith “deserved to die.”

Anita Vo, 23 was stabbed to death with her mother, Zamora added, because Tanya Jaime Nelson felt she had also “deceived her, cheated her, like her mom.”

Defense attorney Ken Reed argued that Zamora made up that story to implicate Nelson and escape a death penalty prosecution.

Reed argued that Zamora was the sole killer, and that his client was not present when the two victims were slashed to death.

Tanya Jaime Nelson faces the death penalty hearing next week because her jury convicted her of the special circumstances of committing multiple murders, murders during the commission of robbery, and murder by lying in wait.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tanya Jaime Nelson Photos

Tanya Jaime Nelson
Tanya Jaime Nelson 2
Tanya Nelson, WA-4501

Tanya Jaime Nelson FAQ

Tanya Jaime Nelson 2021

Tanya Jaime Nelson is currently incarcerated at the Central California Women’s Facility the home of California Death Row For Women

Why Is Tanya Jaime Nelson On Death Row

Tanya Jaime Nelson was convicted of two murders