David Freeman Alabama Death Row

david freeman 2021

David Freeman was sentenced to death by the State of Alabama for a double murder. According to court documents David Freeman would go over to the home of his ex girlfriend and kill her and would sexually assault and murder her mother. David Freeman who committed the double murder because the girl broke up with him. David Freeman would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

David Freeman 2021 Information

Inmate: FREEMAN, DAVID
AIS: 0000Z506
  
Institution: HOLMAN PRISON

David Freeman More News

 The evidence against Freeman was overwhelming.   In its sentencing order, the trial court made the following findings of fact concerning the crime and Freeman’s participation in the murders:

“On March 11, 1988, Deborah Gordon Hosford picked up her sister, [17-year-old] Sylvia Gordon, from Lanier High School [in Montgomery] and drove to their home at 29 Rosebud Court, arriving at approximately 3:30 p.m. Waiting on the porch was the defendant, David Freeman, who had ridden his bicycle to their home.   David Freeman ․ lived in a trailer near the Gordon home, and he wanted a romantic relationship with Sylvia Gordon.   Sylvia was not romantically interested in Freeman, and was planning to tell him that she no longer wished to see him.   Deborah, Sylvia, and Freeman entered the home.   Deborah had to return to work and left at approximately 3:45 p.m. When she left, Freeman and Sylvia were sitting on the couch.

“David Freeman had given Sylvia a note essentially stating that he did not like seeing her only once a week, that he loved her, and that he did not want to lose her like all of his other girlfriends.   Sylvia in return gave Freeman a note stating that she viewed the relationship only as friendship and that she did not want to have a serious relationship.   Approximately a week prior to the murders, Freeman had a conversation with Francis Boozer, a co-worker, and told her that he would rather see Sylvia dead than [for] someone else have her.

“At about 1:00 a.m. Deborah Gordon Hosford returned home.   She found the lights of the home turned off and the door unlocked and slightly ajar.   She went inside and noticed that the house had been ransacked.   She went to her sister’s bedroom and found Sylvia, dead, in her bed with multiple stab wounds and clad only in a T-shirt and socks.   As she was fleeing the house, she saw her mother, [43-year-old] Mary Gordon, lying in a pool of blood on the floor of her bedroom.   Mrs. Gordon was clad only in a shirt, with her body being nude from the waist down with her legs spread apart.

“Police arrived at the Gordon home and found blood throughout most of the house.   Mary Gordon was stabbed 14 times by David Freeman;  two wounds were fatal.   She lived for about five minutes [after being stabbed the first time].   She had also been raped, and the semen deposited in her was consistent as having been left by Freeman.   Sylvia Gordon was stabbed 22 times by him, and she remained conscious for eight to ten minutes after the first wound was inflicted.   None of the wounds were fatal;  Sylvia Gordon bled to death.   Examination also revealed that Sylvia Gordon had tears in her vagina.   Additionally, police found a shoe print on the shirt of Mary Gordon and a shoe print on a card found on the floor near the body of Mary Gordon.   Police also noted that all [telephone] lines in the house had been cut.

“Freeman had brought a knife with him and used it to brutally kill Sylvia Gordon because she did not want a relationship, as well as [to] kill Mary Gordon when she walked in on the murder.   After committing the murders, Freeman stole the Gordons’ 1980 Pontiac Sunbird and put his bike that he had ridden to the Gordon home in it and fled the scene.   He attempted to establish an alibi by later going to work.   The Gordons’ car was found in a parking lot near Freeman’s apartment.   Freeman’s fingerprint was found on the car and blood that was consistent with that of Sylvia Gordon and Mary Gordon was also in the car.   Additionally found in the car was a butcher knife that had been cleaned of blood.   The butcher knife was examined by an expert in trace evidence with the Department of Forensic Sciences and was determined to be consistent with having caused the wounds to Mary Gordon, to cut the bra and panties of Mary Gordon, and to cut the jeans of Sylvia Gordon.

“When the police arrived at Freeman’s apartment, Freeman answered the door, and the officers noted a bandage on Freeman’s right hand.   When asked how he cut his hand, Freeman lied, claiming that he had cut his hand while repairing a chair.   Freeman was arrested at his apartment.   The police, upon a consent to search, found the clothing worn by Freeman, which had blood consistent with that of Sylvia Gordon on them.   A mixture of blood and semen was found in the underwear that he had worn.   His shoes were seized and compared to the prints found on the shirt of Mary Gordon and the card found in the Gordon home.   Examination revealed that Freeman’s shoes were consistent with the prints found at the scene.   Bite marks were noted on Freeman’s arm, which were [determined to have been] made by Sylvia Gordon.

“Freeman initially lied to the police as to his involvement in the crimes.   He tried to establish an alibi for his whereabouts.   However, when confronted with the evidence, Freeman admitted to stabbing Sylvia Gordon and stated that upon Mary Gordon’s entering the home he had no choice but to stab her.   Freeman also claimed to have blacked out on two occasions during the crimes.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/al-court-of-criminal-appeals/1078587.html

Harvey Windsor Alabama Death Row

harvey windsor alabama

Harvey Windsor was sentenced to death by the State of Alabama for a robbery murder. According to court documents Harvey Windsor would rob two stores killing a store clerk in each robbery. Harvey Windsor would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Harvey Windsor 2021 Information

Inmate: WINDSOR, HARVEY LEE
AIS: 0000Z498
  
Institution: HOLMAN PRISON

Harvey Windsor More News

At trial, the State offered evidence that Harvey Lee Windsor and an accomplice, Colon Lavon Guthrie, robbed two convenience stores. The owner of each store was fatally shot. This appeal addresses Windsor’s conviction for the capital murder of Rayford Howard, who was killed in the first of those two robberies.

The statement of facts set out by the Court of Criminal Appeals in its June 17, 1994, opinion included the following:”On February 25, [1988,] at approximately 2:00 p.m., Rayford Howard was found dead in his store in St. Clair County. He died as a result of a shotgun blast to the chest. Money had been taken from the store’s cash register and the victim’s pants pockets had been emptied. A witness saw someone carrying a `sawed-off shotgun’ leave the victim’s store, open the breach and reload the gun, and get into a black sports car. “On this same day, the appellant and Guthrie were seen in St. Clair County travelling together in a black Ford Mustang automobile with gold stripes and the word `Boss’ written in gold on the sides. At approximately 1:00 p.m. that day, the *1045 appellant and Guthrie had visited Sammie Sue Wilson Osborne at her house. Ms. Osborne’s house was located approximately five miles from Rayford Howard’s store. “The automobile in which the appellant was riding was seen later that afternoon travelling at a high rate of speed in Marshall County and in Lawrence County.

The automobile was also seen at Tommy’s Store, a convenience store, in Lawrence County. An occupant of the car discarded two Budweiser beer cans in the parking lot of Tommy’s Store. “The automobile was also seen at approximately 8:00 p.m. at a store in Colbert County. The attendant at the Colbert County store, Randall Earl Pepper, was killed by a shotgun blast to the head. The appellant was identified as the person running from the store and getting into the automobile. When the appellant was arrested, he had in his possession a .25 caliber automatic pistol that had belonged to Mr. Pepper. “The automobile in which the appellant and Guthrie were travelling had been stolen on February 23, 1988, from Connie’s Quick Stop convenience store in Tiftonia, Tennessee.

The automobile was recovered on February 26, at Tiftonia Baptist Church, two-tenths of a mile from Connie’s Quick Stop. Guthrie’s sister’s house was located between Connie’s Quick Stop and the Tiftonia Baptist Church. “When the automobile was searched, the following items were recovered: a ring of keys, a receipt from Parisian department store, a 20-gauge shotgun shell, and cigarette butts. One of the keys on the recovered ring opened a padlock that secured the rear door of Howard’s store. The Parisian receipt was for a suit that Mr. Howard had purchased for his wife. The 20-gauge shotgun shell had been fired from the same gun as a shell that was recovered outside Howard’s store. The appellant’s fingerprint was found on one of the cigarette butts. “Additionally, Guthrie’s fingerprints were found on Mr. Howard’s driver’s license, which was recovered, along with his wallet and its contents, beside the road a few miles from his store. Guthrie’s fingerprints were also found on one of the Budweiser beer cans that were left at Tommy’s Store in Lawrence County.”

https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/1996/1931643-1.html

William Kuenzel Alabama Death Row

William Kuenzel 2021

William Kuenzel was sentenced to death by the State of Alabama for the murder of a store clerk during a robbery. According to court documents William Kuenzel woud enter a convenience store and in the process of robbing it would shoot and kill the store clerk Linda Offord. William Kuenzel would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death. William Kuenzel has maintained his innocence since being sent to death row in Alabama in 1988

William Kuenzel would die from cancer on Alabama death row still maintaining his innocence

William Kuenzel 2021 Information

Inmate: KUENZEL, WILLIAM ERNEST
AIS: 0000Z489
  
Institution: HOLMAN PRISON

William Kuenzel More News

The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from a death row inmate in Alabama who said evidence withheld by prosecutors entitled him to a new court hearing.

The justices did not comment Monday in turning away the appeal from Bill Kuenzel, convicted of killing a convenience store clerk in 1987.

Kuenzel’s case had gotten a boost from former Attorney General Edwin Meese, who said Kuenzel is “very likely actually innocent.”

He also has gotten support from actors and former prosecutors around the nation.

Kuenzel’s lawyers said that the evidence would have raised doubts about the truthfulness of plea deal testimony from a roommate who said Kuenzel committed the killing.

State courts had earlier refused Kuenzel’s pleas for a new hearing.

Kuenzel’s attorneys issued a statement after the SCOTUS ruling today.

“We’re obviously disappointed that the Court didn’t review the case of an innocent man facing death, given that the key evidence has never once been substantively reviewed by any court and only because some paperwork supposedly missed a filing deadline in the 1990’s,” according to the statement. “This case represents the most extreme example of government overreach, literally seeking to wrongfully take a citizen’s life without fair process.

“And for the people of Alabama, executing Bill means that Linda Offord’s real murderer will continue walking the streets – endangering every man, woman and child.  The good news is that, while the window has narrowed, there are still those who are empowered to effect justice,” according to the statement.

The statement also urges the Alabama Legislature to enact legislation to create an Innocence Commission. The State Senate passed legislation earlier this year modeled off of a North Carolina bill, the statement notes.

The statement also called upon Kuenzel’s confessed accomplice, Harvey Venn, to come forward “and admit that he lied to save his own life.”

It also challenged the man who prosecuted the case should acknowledge his constitutional error and witnesses could come forward and share their stories. “Because if an innocent man is killed and those individuals don’t speak out, then it will rest on their conscience forever.  And that is a sin approaching the one committed 29 years ago almost to the date,” according to the statement.

https://www.al.com/news/birmingham/2016/10/us_supreme_court_rejects_appea.html

Earl McGahee Alabama Death Row

Earl McGahee Alabama

Earl McGahee was sentenced to death by the State of Alabama for the murder of two women. According to court documents Earl McGahee would storm into a classroom at a nursing school where he would murder his ex wife and a fellow student. Earl McGahee would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death.

Earl McGahee 2021 Information

Inmate: MCGAHEE, EARL JEROME
AIS: 0000Z466
  
Institution: HOLMAN PRISON

Earl McGahee More News

“On September 11, 1985, Connie Brown (the appellant’s ex-wife), Cassandra Lee and Dee Ann Duncan were all nursing students at George C. Wallace Junior College in Selma, Alabama.   That morning, Brown, Lee and Duncan were in a class of thirty-four students in a classroom in the Science Building at the junior college.   At approximately 10:00 that morning, the appellant came to this classroom and asked to see Brown.   The instructor, Shelia Guidry, told Brown that she could leave the classroom.   Brown left the room with the appellant and she went to the office of Joyce Howell, a secretary at the college, and asked to use the telephone.   Brown appeared nervous and Howell helped Brown dial the phone numbers.   Brown made calls to an elementary school and to her mother.   The appellant came into the office while Brown was making the phone calls.   As a result of her conversation with Brown, Howell called campus security to remove the appellant from the campus.   Howell then walked Brown back to her classroom.

“While Brown was out of the classroom, Guidry had recessed the class for a short break.   Brown returned to the class at the end of the break and took her seat.   Many of the students were in the classroom at this time because they had remained in the room during break or they had returned from the break.

“Brown sat directly in front of Lee and to the right of Duncan.   Shortly after Brown returned to the classroom, the appellant Earl McGahee appeared at the door and asked Brown to come outside.   Brown refused.

“At this point, the appellant entered the classroom and shut the door.   He pulled a pistol from his pants and aimed it at Brown.   A shot was fired and the appellant began walking towards Brown.   All of the students began fleeing the classroom.   Lee was unable to leave the classroom because Brown fell across her desk and then she (Lee) was shot by the appellant.   Duncan fell as she was leaving the classroom and remained on the floor and acted hurt.

“Brown struggled to the front of the classroom and fell to the floor.   Earl McGahee then began kicking and stomping Brown.

“Dana Andrews was walking down a hallway in the Science Building that morning when she saw the students running out of Guidry’s classroom and heard gunshots.   She went to the room to see if she could help and pushed open the classroom door.   Andrews saw the appellant ‘leaning over and he had her [Brown’s] legs lifted up with his left arm and he had his right arm, he was pulling her panties off.’  (R-474).

“Ferrin Eiland, an instructor at the college, went to Guidry’s classroom when he heard the students screaming.   He looked through the door window and saw Brown lying on the floor naked.   Brown’s legs were propped up and parted and the appellant was kneeling between her legs.   Eiland saw the appellant strike Brown twice on the chest with his fists.

“Charles Duckett, also an instructor at the college, went to Guidry’s classroom when he heard there had been a shooting.   Duckett looked in the door window and saw the appellant block the door with a chair.   When Duckett heard several shots, he went downstairs and told Eiland to call an ambulance.   When he returned to the classroom door, he saw the appellant with a gun in his hands and his hands were bloody.   Duckett asked the appellant if he could help the people who were hurt and the appellant replied that no one was hurt and then waved the gun at Duckett.

“While Dee Ann Duncan was lying on the floor pretending to be hurt, she heard Earl McGahee say to Brown, ‘Get up, Bitch’ (R. 780). He told Brown that nothing was wrong with her and he began kicking her.   He then said several times, ‘give it to me like you had used to” and “you make my d_ hard’ (R-781).   Duncan noticed that Brown did not have her jeans on.

“At some point, the appellant came over to Duncan and put his hands between her legs and began rubbing them.   He then jerked her head up and asked her what was wrong.   The appellant began striking Duncan’s head with the pistol and Duncan blacked out.

“Truett McGee testified that he went to 1410 Philpott in Selma on the morning in question to investigate an unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.   He was told by a Mrs. Redd that the appellant had taken her car.   Mrs. Redd was a relative of the appellant.   While McGee was investigating this incident, he received a call that there had been a shooting at the college.

“McGee proceeded to the college and went to the classroom in the Science Building.   When he looked through the door window, Earl McGahee pointed a pistol at him.   McGee then heard a shot.   McGee told the appellant to throw out his pistol and come out of the classroom.   The appellant complied and was arrested and taken into custody.

“Officer Jerry Ward of the Selma Police Department then took the appellant to a patrol car and read him his Miranda [v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966),] rights.   While he was being transported to the police station, the appellant began talking.   He stated, ‘Well, if the son of a bitch lives, it ain’t my fault cause I gave her a free ticket to heaven.   If the son of a bitch lives it’s a miracle.   It’s only because Jesus must want her to.’  (R-761, 763).   The appellant further stated that things didn’t work out like he wanted them to so he ‘started busting caps’ (R. 763).   He told the police that, if he had taken all the shells in the classroom that he had in the car, the police would not have taken him alive.

“When the police entered the classroom after Earl McGahee had been taken into custody, they discovered Lee, Brown and Duncan in the classroom.   Brown was already dead and Lee and Duncan were injured and were transported to Selma Medical Center.

“Lee arrived at the hospital with multiple (five) gunshot wounds to her body.   When she arrived at the hospital, Lee had no palpable blood pressure, she had suffered some blood loss and she was paralyzed from the waist down.   Lee was resuscitated with fluids and given two pints of blood.   Surgery was performed on Lee to repair an injury to her spleen.   One of the gunshots caused an air leak in Lee’s lungs but surgery could not be performed on the lungs because Lee’s condition was not stabilized.   After surgery, Lee’s family requested that Lee not receive any more blood transfusions because she was a Jehovah’s Witness.

“Lee died on September 21, 1985[,] as a result of complications from the gunshot wounds, i.e., meningitis and adult respiratory distress syndrome.   Medical experts testified that the fact that Lee did not receive any more blood transfusions after her family’s request did not contribute to her death because they were able to compensate for any blood loss by other means.

“Duncan suffered a depressed skull fracture but survived.   As a result of her injury, she lost the ability to taste and smell.

“An autopsy performed on Brown revealed that she died as a result of repeated blows to the face and head which resulted in multiple fractures to the skull and subsequent injury to the brain.   Dr. Allen Stillwell, a forensic pathologist, testified that these injuries would be consistent with Brown’s being hit with the butt handle of the gun and being stomped with a foot.   He further stated that Brown had been strangled.   Brown also received blunt trauma injuries to her upper abdomen area as well as two gunshot wounds to her left arm.   However, these injuries were of a non-fatal nature.   Stillwell found no evidence in Brown’s body of recent sexual activity.

“Lonnie Ray Hardin, a firearms and toolmarks expert with the Department of Forensic Sciences, testified that the bullets removed from Lee’s and Brown’s bodies by Dr. Stillwell were fired through the same .357 Magnum gun which the appellant threw out of the classroom.   The hammer of this gun was found on the floor in the classroom.   Hardin testified that it would take a considerable amount of force to dislodge the hammer from the gun.   The State then rested its case.

“The appellant’s first three witnesses were the psychiatrists who examined him at the Taylor Hardin Secure Medical Facility and who served on the Lunacy Commission.

“Drs. Omar Mohabbott, Marino S. Tulao and Kamal Nagi all testified that, based on their examinations of this appellant McGahee, they found him competent to stand trial.   Drs. Tulao and Nagi stated that they also found the appellant to be sane at the time these offenses were committed.   Dr. Mohabbott testified that he did not examine the appellant concerning his sanity at the time of these offenses.

“Elizabeth Marie Sapala, a private psychiatrist appointed to assist the defense, testified that, although she found the appellant to be competent to stand trial, she believed the appellant lacked the capacity to conform his conduct to the requirements of law at the time of this offense.   She stated that Earl McGahee was unable to resist the rage inside of him due to several stress factors, i.e., the appellant’s unemployment, his financial situation, his divorce from Brown and subsequent custody disputes over their child, his problems with his mother and his substance abuse.

“The appellant testified that he first met Brown when she was pregnant with her first child, Anwon, whom the appellant later adopted after he and Brown were married.   Brown and the appellant became friends and later married on September 12, 1980.   The appellant testified that the marriage took place because Brown told him she was pregnant but the appellant later learned that she was not pregnant.   Brown then became pregnant and had a child by the appellant, named Earl Jerome McGahee, Jr. The appellant and Brown lived in New Orleans, Louisiana, because the appellant was in the Coast Guard and was stationed there.   While there, the appellant pleaded guilty to a child abuse charge and received counseling.   He testified that Brown treated him badly when they lived in New Orleans.   She would invite relatives to stay with them for long periods of time without his permission.   He found his wife at home one day dressed in a nightgown and a man was in the house.   One day the appellant came home and Anwon ran up to him and called him “Daddy.”   Brown told Anwon to get away from the appellant because he wasn’t Anwon’s father.   The appellant stated he got mad and accidentally hit Anwon.   Brown left the house with the two children and had the appellant arrested for cruelty to a juvenile.   The appellant pleaded guilty to that charge and served twelve months and twelve days in jail.

“Brown returned to Selma after the appellant was arrested.   She divorced the appellant and took back her maiden name, Brown.

“When Earl McGahee was released from jail, he returned to Selma and lived with his mother while attending George C. Wallace Junior College.   In July of 1985, the appellant’s mother ‘kicked him out of the house’ and filed reckless endangerment charges against him.

“On the day in question, the appellant went to his mother’s house to talk to his sister.   As he was leaving, he noticed the keys to his mother’s car.   He took the keys and drove the car to the college.   He then went to Brown’s classroom and asked her to get Earl, Jr., out of school so that he, the appellant, could see him.   Brown called the school and then told the appellant he couldn’t take Earl, Jr., from the school.

“The appellant then went back to his mother’s car and got her gun.   He went to the classroom to see Brown but she would not talk to him.   He pulled the pistol from his pants and said, ‘What about now?’  (R. 968).   Brown jumped up and the appellant pulled the trigger.   The appellant then ‘went upside her head’ with the pistol and kicked her in the head.   He stated he removed Brown’s clothes because she had disgraced his name and he wanted to disgrace her.   He denied making sexual advances toward her.

“The appellant testified that he didn’t mean to shoot Lee and he hit Duncan because he panicked.

“The State presented several witnesses on rebuttal, including a clinical psychologist, to refute the appellant’s allegations that he was insane at the time these offenses were committed.”

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/al-court-of-criminal-appeals/1401668.html

Harry Nicks Alabama Death Row

harry nicks alabama

Harry Nicks was sentenced to death by the State of Alabama for the murder of a man during a robbery. According to court documents Harry Nicks would force two employees of a pawn shop to lie on the floor after robbing the store. Harry Nicks would shoot both of the employees in the back of the head. The man, Robert Back, would die from his injuries however the woman would survive. Harry Nicks would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Harry Nicks 2021 Information

Inmate: NICKS, HARRY
AIS: 0000Z444
  
Institution: HOLMAN PRISON

Harry Nicks More News

This case arises out of an incident which occurred on March 5, 1983, in the Bessemer Pawn Shop at 315 N. 19th Street, Bessemer, Alabama. The pawn shop was owned and operated by Robert and Isadore Back. At approximately 2:30 p.m., a black male entered the shop. He was wearing a red vinyl jacket, blue jeans, and a clear plastic shower cap on his head. He had acne scars on the right side of his face. He was carrying a red canvas tote bag which had a white shoulder strap. Robert Back and an employee, Debra Lynn Love, were in the shop at the time. The man approached Back and said, “Man, I need some money. I got to get out of town quick.” He then pulled a pistol from the tote bag, pointed it at Back, and told Love not to move. Back took money from a cash drawer and put it in the tote bag. The robber demanded more money. He demanded “big bucks,” and continuously called Back a “god damned old man” and “mother fucking old man.” He threatened to kill Back and pulled a second pistol from the bag. Back took money from a second cash drawer and put it in the bag. The robber demanded more money. He wanted “big bucks” and “big bills.” He ordered Love to lie on the floor and she complied. Back opened the cash drawer in the safe and handed more money to the robber and told him, “This is all I have.” The robber ordered Back to lie next to Love on the floor. As Back and Love lay face down on the floor, the robber fired three shots. One shot entered the back of Love’s head; one entered the back of Back’s head, penetrating his brain; and one went into a rubber mat on the floor. Back either died instantly or in a matter of minutes from the bullet wound to his head; however, the bullet fired into Love’s head lodged in her skull and she survived. As soon as Love heard the robber leave the shop, she telephoned the police, giving them a detailed description of the robber. *1021 Subsequently, Love identified appellant, in two lineups conducted by the police, as the person who robbed the pawn shop and shot Back and her. She also made a positive in-court identification of appellant.

Venita Bishop was working as a cashier in a nearby store on the date of the incident. She observed a black male, fitting the description of the robber, in her store around 12:30 to 12:45 p.m. Subsequently, she identified appellant, in a lineup, as the person she observed in the store where she worked on the day of the incident. She also made a positive in-court identification of appellant.

A firearms expert determined that two of the bullets fired by the robber were .22 caliber and fired from the same gun. The two pistols displayed by the robber were never found. The autopsy performed on Back’s body disclosed stippling, or powder burns, around the wound to the back of his head, indicating that the pistol from which the shot was fired was very close to his head, probably within two inches.

Harry Nicks did not testify in his own behalf during the guilt phase of the trial. He called only two witnesses: Dr. Clifford B. Hardin, a psychiatrist, and Gordon Burkhead, his landlord, in support of his insanity plea.

https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/court-of-appeals-criminal/1987/521-so-2d-1018-0.html