Charles Flores Texas Death Row

charles flores texas

Charles Flores was sentenced to death by the State of Texas for a murder committed during a burglary. According to court documents Charles Flores and an accomplice would break into a home and fatally shoot the homeowner. Charles Flores would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Charles Flores 2022 Information

SID Number:    04014676

TDCJ Number:    00999299


Race:    H

Gender:    M

Age:    52

Maximum Sentence Date:    DEATH ROW       

Current Facility:    POLUNSKY

Projected Release Date:    DEATH ROW

Parole Eligibility Date:    DEATH ROW

Inmate Visitation Eligible:    YES

Charles Flores More News

The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a case that would have allowed them to rule on Texas law enforcement officers’ use of investigative hypnosis.

Charles Don Flores was sentenced to death for the 1998 murder of Elizabeth Black. His conviction was based on eyewitness testimony obtained through “investigative hypnosis.” Law enforcement officers claim this tactic can refresh a witness’s memory, but scientists say the process is “unreliable, even if supposed safeguards are applied.”

Jill Barganier, Black’s neighbor, recalled seeing two men outside of her home on the morning of the murder. An amicus curiae brief filed by The Innocence Project notes that “the sun had not risen, and there were no street lights on her block.” When first questioned by the police, she did not identify Flores in a photographic lineup.

Six days later, police hypnotized her to “help her relax and ‘do a good composite.’” They allegedly asked suggestive questions to prompt Barganier to describe Flores’ characteristics. The Innocence Project brief states:

During the hypnosis session, Barganier described the passenger’s hair as “a lot like” the driver’s, which she described as “long and wavy” and had previously emphasized as “dirty.” Despite this fact, the officer conducting the hypnosis session proceeded to ask if the passenger’s hair was neatly cut or trimmed, as Flores’s was.

The brief adds that the composite sketch Barganier produced after being hypnotized “does not resemble Flores in any way.” And in a subsequent lineup following the hypnosis, Barganier still did not identify Flores. But at trial, after time and media attention surrounding the case had “contaminated” her memory, she made an in-court identification of Flores that led to his conviction. These identifications are “highly prejudicial” for jurors. The Innocence Project notes that “more than half of the first 250 DNA exoneration cases featured an incorrect in-court identification.”

Although the Supreme Court declined to rule on the case, two Texas legislators are seeking to ban investigative hypnosis during the 2021 legislative session. Rep. Eddie Lucio and Sen. Juan Hinojosa filed House Bill 1002 and Senate Bill 281, citing a local news investigation that revealed the extent of investigative hypnosis in Texas

author avatar

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top