Shawn Grate Ohio Death Row

shawn grate

Shawn Grate was sentenced to death by the State of Ohio for a series of sexual murders. According to court documents Shawn Grate was responsible for a series of sexual assaults and murders in Ohio. This serial killer would be convicted of five murders and sentenced to death.

Ohio Death Row Inmate List

Shawn Grate 2021 Information

Number A751645

DOB 08/08/1976

Gender Male Race White

Admission Date 06/01/2018

Institution Chillicothe Correctional Institution


Shawn Grate More News

The Ohio Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously affirmed the convictions and death sentence for Shawn Grate in the murder of two women in Ashland County.

Grate, who murdered at least five women in three Ohio counties, was convicted in 2018 of killing Stacey Stanley, 43, and Elizabeth Griffith, 29, after a lengthy jury trial in Ashland County Common Pleas Court.

The jury recommended the death penalty for Grate, and Judge Ron Forsthoefel agreed.

Grate’s one-man crime spree ended after he kidnapped a woman prosecutors identified as Jane Doe. Grate raped her multiple times, but she managed to escape after calling 911 with Grate’s phone on Sept. 13, 2016.

After Doe’s rescue and the apprehension of Grate, police found the bodies of Griffith and Stanley at a house at 363 Covert Court, near downtown Ashland. Both women had been strangled. The vacant house where Grate had been squatting has since been demolished.

Grate also has been convicted of killing two women in Richland County: Candice Cunningham, 29, and Rebekah Leicy, 31, all by strangulation, and was given a life sentence last year for the 2006 murder of Dana Nicole Lowrey in Marion County. 

Defense attorney Robert Whitney handled the Ashland County case with son Rolf. 

The state’s highest court rejected Grate’s arguments that his trial was riddled with errors sufficient to overturn his conviction.

Grate claimed that his defense attorneys were ineffective for failing to request a change in venue; for failing to request a gag order; for withdrawing his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity outside of his presence; for declining to make opening statements, and for failing to cross-examine the majority of the state’s witnesses.

However, the court did find that Grate’s attorneys were deficient when they did not object to testimony about glass tubes, each of which contained “love roses” allegedly used for drugs. The court also found Grate’s attorneys were deficient when they did not object to “irrelevant” testimony concerning a stolen safe and Grate’s phone calls to a marijuana dealer.

Justice Judi French, writing for the court, also noted an “inappropriate” remark made by one of Grate’s attorneys, and wondered whether the attorney’s “graphic characterization” of Grate’s motivation for killing Stanley was appropriate or helpful.

“But none of these errors rose to the level of reversible error,” French wrote.

“In view of the overwhelming evidence of Grate’s guilt, we conclude that the cumulative effect of counsel’s errors did not deprive him of a fair trial.”

Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor and Justices Sharon Kennedy, Patrick Fischer, Patrick DeWine, and Melody Stewart joined Justice French’s decision.

In a written concurring opinion, Justice Michael Donnelly agreed with the court’s opinion and judgment upholding Grate’s convictions and death sentences, but expressed alarm about decisions made by Grate’s attorneys, saying their failings “were more than plentiful.”

Donnelly wrote that Grate’s attorneys failed to ensure the timely analysis of Grate’s neuroimaging results and failed to ensure that an expert was able to finish Grate’s mitigation report, leaving the jury with an incomplete view of Grate’s mental health.

“Counsel’s failure to provide the jury with Grate’s potential mental-health diagnoses could be particularly problematic given that mental-health diagnoses are ‘entitled to significant weight in mitigation,'” Donnelly wrote.

“However, speculation is not evidence and there is not enough information in the record before this court to conclude whether Grate has satisfied the prejudice prong of the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel analysis,” Donnelly added. “Information outside the record is necessary to determine whether counsel’s failure to present particular evidence had a prejudicial impact on the outcome of Grate’s mitigation phase of his capital proceedings.”

“If such evidence exists, it would be entirely appropriate to submit it in a postconviction petition as support for an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.”

French, in her decision, wrote that the court gave “considerable” consideration to Grate’s mental health problems.

Dr. John Fabian, a clinical psychologist, testified during trial and diagnosed Grate with a long-term mild depressive condition, a bipolar and related disorders, ADHD, a language-based learning disorder, a neuro cognizance disorder, and a personality disorder. 

French also wrote that consideration was given to Grate’s background and upbringing. His older half-sister, Barbara Charter, testified during trial that she cared for Grate until she was about 16 because their mother was frequently absent.

“Dr. Fabian linked Grate’s feelings of misery toward his mother, and his fantasy of murdering her, with similar feelings that caused him to murder Griffith and Stanley,” French wrote. “But we find nothing that is mitigating in this connection. And Grate acknowledged during allocution that he knew right from wrong when he strangled Griffith and Stanley. Upon independent weighing, we conclude that the aggravating circumstances as to each aggravated-murder count clearly outweigh the mitigating factors beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Grate is housed at the Chillicothe Correctional Institution. Even if Grate appeals the decision upholding his death sentence, it’s not clear when he would face execution.

Gov. Mike DeWine announced Tuesday that no more executions would be held in Ohio until state lawmakers pick an alternative to lethal injection. 

DeWine said he still supports capital punishment as Ohio law. But he has come to question its value since the days he helped write the state’s current law — enacted in 1981 — because of the long delays between crime and punishment.

author avatar

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top