Jerry Chambers Pennsylvania Death Row

jerry chambers pennsylvania

Jerry Chambers was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for the murder of a three year old girl. According to court documents Jerry Chambers became enraged when he saw the three year old watching him have sex with her aunt. Jerry Chambers would fling the little girl into a radiator causing her death. Later evidence would show that Jerry Chambers beat and molested the children of the home. Jerry Chambers would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Jerry Chambers 2022 Information

Parole Number: 674FQ
Age: 50
Date of Birth: 11/17/1971
Race/Ethnicity: BLACK
Height: 6′ 00″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: MEDIUM
Current Location: PHOENIX

Jerry Chambers More News

The myriad charges in this case arose out of the abuse of P.B. and her three sisters, which culminated on the night of August 16, 2003, when Jerry Chambers caused the death of P.B. Evidence presented at trial established that in 2002, appellant was living in an apartment located at 1705 South 5th Street in the City of Philadelphia. Tiffany Bennett, the mother of four girls, P.B., age three, P.B.2., age four, A.B.2., age six, and A.B., age ten, knew appellant and his brother, Jason Chambers (“Jason”) from the neighborhood. Bennett met appellant and Jason in 1999, when she moved into the neighborhood to live with her mother. Jason and appellant paid Bennett to braid their hair, and Bennett’s daughters played with Jason’s children. Notes of Testimony (“N.T.”), 5/13/05, at 64-67. Bennett found appellant to be “a nice guy. I didn’t see anything wrong with him.” N.T. 5/13/05, at 67. Bennett initially asked Jason to babysit the girls, and he did so for some period of time. Precisely when appellant began babysitting the girls is unclear; however, the girls were in his care by the fall of 2002. Appellant babysat the girls during Bennett’s work hours, from 4:00 p.m. until midnight.

The house at 1705 South 5th Street contained three apartments. Jason Chambers lived on the second floor with his two sons, Jayshawn and Jayshine. A woman named Jennifer and her son lived on the third floor, while appellant shared the first floor apartment with Ruth Leonard, whom he called his “godmother.” Bennett’s sister, Candice Geiger, was also living with appellant and Ruth on the first floor. When Bennett first began leaving her children with appellant she was unaware that her sister Candice was living with Jerry Chambers; however, even after Bennett discovered that her sister was living in the house with her daughters, she never discussed their care or welfare with her.

Bennett initially paid Jerry Chambers $60.00 per week to watch the girls. The girls were in appellant’s apartment for approximately eight hours per day, from 4:00 p.m. until after midnight, when Bennett picked them up and took them to her home. Prior to Thanksgiving of 2002, however, appellant suggested that it would be better for the girls to stay the night at his apartment rather than go home at 1:00 or 2:00 a.m. Bennett agreed, and began to pay appellant $80.00 per week for babysitting. At this point, Bennett’s interaction with the children became less frequent and she largely stopped visiting them at appellant’s apartment or taking them home for weekends or special occasions. Someone from appellant’s house would come to her work to get the babysitting money, or she would drop the money off during her lunch break. Bennett spent an hour or so with her children on Christmas Day; then, between Easter and August 17, 2003, she did not see her children at all. In June of 2003, appellant asked Bennett to take her children back, to which she replied, “I don’t want the kids.” N.T., 5/12/05, at 150.

The children lived in deplorable conditions. The apartment consisted of two bedrooms, a bathroom, a living area, and a kitchen. It was filthy and infested with flies and cockroaches. An overwhelming stench of urine permeated the dwelling. N.T., 5/3/05, at 15. The front bedroom was occupied by Ruth Leonard, while the girls shared the back bedroom with appellant and Geiger. There were two doors to the bedroom. One was nailed shut, and the other was stripped of its latch mechanism, and could only be opened by a key. The bedroom was furnished with two beds: one, next to the radiator, for the children; the other for Jerry Chambers and Geiger. There was a child’s potty overflowing with urine and feces on the floor. There was also feces on the floor around the room, particularly by the children’s bed. The single window was covered with dark plastic, and on the wall were taped six pieces of paper listing “Rules for this room.” Id., at 24. Rules one through six instructed the children in their daily chores, while rule seven mandated that everyone “[r]espect [appellant] at all times or every body [sic] gets their ass whooped.” Id., at 25.

Jerry Chambers regularly beat the four girls with extension cords, belts, a metal pole, and a broomstick. N.T., 4/20/04, at 22-24, 39.2 The girls were so severely bruised from the beatings that appellant did not permit them to leave the apartment, even to go to school. If anyone visited, appellant locked the girls in the bedroom or made the girls cover their faces and bodies. When P.B. wet the bed, appellant made A.B. put the three-year-old in a cold shower. To keep P.B. from getting too cold, A.B. would get into the shower with her. N.T., 4/22/04, at 26. The girls were also locked in the basement with appellant’s two pit bulls as punishment, and were fed sporadically and inconsistently. At times, they were forced to eat “dog poop” out of the dogs’ food bowls. N.T., 4/20/04, at 11-12, 25.

On the night of August 16, 2003, Jerry Chambers beat P.B. with an extension cord while she was in the shower. Later, he locked A.B. in the basement, and he, Geiger, P.B., A.B.2, and P.B.2 went to bed. Some time after midnight, appellant and Geiger were having sex when appellant noticed P.B. looking at them. Appellant told her to stop watching, but, when she did not comply, appellant called her over to his bed, beat her with an extension cord, and struck her in the face several times with his hand. Geiger also beat P.B., then appellant picked her up by her feet and threw her across the room. P.B. struck her head on the cast-iron radiator and ended up lodged between the bed, radiator, and wall. She remained there, slowly suffocating, until the next day. Appellant did nothing to help the child; further, he instructed the other girls not to help her. N.T. 4/22/04, at 56.

Around 1:00 p.m. the next day, Jason called the police and told them that P.B. was not breathing. Firefighters dispatched to the apartment found P.B. laying face up on a sofa. Despite realizing that P.B. had been dead for some time, the EMTs attempted to resuscitate her. She was later pronounced dead on arrival at Methodist Hospital.

When police officers arrived at the scene, appellant and Geiger calmly falsified a story that they had put the children to bed at 9:00 p.m. the previous evening, and that when they awoke around 1:00 p.m. the next day, they found P.B. between the wall and the bed. They reported that P.B. was unresponsive when they found her. N.T. 5/10/05, at 75, 77, 81.

Later that day, police found A.B. hiding on the third floor of the building with her head wrapped in a towel. When the towel was removed, the officers found that her eyes were swollen shut and her face so badly beaten that they could not determine her sex. A.B., A .B.2, and P.B.2 were taken to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia for treatment. The girls were interviewed by police officers at Children’s Hospital.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1332849.html

Junius Burno Pennsylvania Death Row

Junius Burno

Junius Burno was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for a double murder. According to court documents Junius Burno was planning to rob the two victims however the victims put up a fight and shot back. In the end Junius Burno would shoot and kill both of the men. Junius Burno would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Junius Burno More News

Parole Number: 8320V
Age: 54
Date of Birth: 10/13/1967
Race/Ethnicity: BLACK
Height: 5′ 11″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: MEDIUM
Current Location: PHOENIX

Junius Burno More News

A death warrant was signed Wednesday for a former Carbon County man who killed two men in 2003 in Allentown, the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections announced.

Junius Burno, now 49, is locked up in Greene State Correctional Institution in Waynesburg. His execution is set for Nov. 17, the department said.

On April 13, 2003, he killed Carlos Juarbe, 45, of South Fourth Street in Allentown, and Oscar Rosado III, 35, of the 1500 block of East Seventh Street in Bethlehem, in the 2600 block of South Fourth Street in the Queen City.

Burno, formerly of Lansford, and Terrance Bethea, now 54, intended to rob the pair, but a shootout ensued with Juarbe hitting Bethea in the leg, authorities said at the time. Burno then “finished off” Juarbe and shot Rosdao once in the head, prosecutors said.

Burno was found guilty in March 2007 and sentenced to death.

A jury deadlocked on a death sentence after Bethea was found guilty in November 2004 of two counts of homicide. County Judge Edward Reibman sentenced Bethea to two life terms and Bethea remains in the state prison in Coal Township, records show.

Reibman had granted Burno a new trial in 2009 due to comments made in court by a prosecutor, but was overruled in June 2014 by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Department of Corrections Secretary John Wetzel signed the Notice of Execution after Gov. Tom Wolf declined to do so in the specified time period, the department said. The secretary had 30 days to sign the document once the governor doesn’t, the department said in a news release.

A moratorium remains in place on carrying out the death penalty in Pennsylvania so it can be further studied. Wolf has said if a court doesn’t stay the execution, he will offer a reprieve, which he has done in other cases, the department said.

https://www.lehighvalleylive.com/lehigh-county/2017/09/death_warrant_signed_in_allent.html

Lavar Brown Pennsylvania Death Row

lavar brown pennsylvania

Lavar Brown was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for the murder of a man. According to court documents Lavar Brown would open fire and shot and killed Robert Crawford who he reportedly had a grudge with. A month before Lavar Brown would be involved in a pharmacy robbery with Christopher Kennedy that would leave a man dead. Lavar Brown would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Lavar Brown 2022 Information

Parole Number: 917FU
Age: 44
Date of Birth: 09/22/1977
Race/Ethnicity: BLACK
Height: 5′ 11″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: DARK
Current Location: PHOENIX

Lavar Brown More News

Years after the verdict, a conviction for a 2003 murder appeared to be under threat.

An assistant district attorney, according to court filings, had discovered that trial prosecutors hid evidence undermining the credibility of testimony that Lavar Brown was an accomplice to the murder of North Philadelphia Rite Aid manager Michael Richardson. The lawyer learned that one of two witnesses who testified against Brown had falsely implicated a woman who was incarcerated at the time of the murder and the lie wasn’t disclosed.

Then, according to the filing, prosecutors decided to continue the cover-up.

Lawyers for the Philadelphia DA’s Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU) now say that a review of the case file revealed a “pattern of prosecutorial misconduct” and that Brown should get a new trial.

“Those documents not only paint a picture of an unfair trial, they also reveal the equally problematic actions of post-conviction prosecutors scrambling to maintain a conviction despite the clearly questionable conduct of the trial prosecutors,” the CIU lawyers wrote in a Nov. 1 filing in Philadelphia Common Pleas Court.

The filing included an internal DA’s Office email in which a supervisor described concealing prior witness statements as both routine and acceptable, and even proposing retaliation against a defense lawyer who provided information helpful to Brown.

Philly’s exonerations, rife with allegations of misconduct, call decades of homicide investigations into question
The prosecutors who worked on the case insist they acted properly.

Trial prosecutor Tom Malone said in a statement that it was “appalling” that the DA’s Office would move to reverse Brown’s conviction, noting that there was ample evidence of Brown’s guilt and that he is on death row for a second murder, the killing of Robert Crawford. (He also said District Attorney Larry Krasner had a pattern of trying “to usurp the role of the courts” to help Brown by agreeing that Brown should be resentenced to life for the Crawford murder. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected that.)

And the victim’s widow, Kristi Richardson, has sought to intervene, saying it’s Krasner’s administration that is committing the injustice. She said the DA waited until the last minute to notify her of a November court date at which the CIU agreed Brown was owed a new trial.

She also alleged that Krasner has a conflict of interest because his former business associates were previously connected to the case. One of them, Lloyd Long, represented Brown on a post-conviction petition; another, Jamie Funt, represented one of the unindicted coconspirators and was a witness at a post-conviction hearing.

“They had 17 months to call the wife of the murder victim,” said Guy D’Andrea, who said he is representing Richardson pro bono. “Why did they call her 11 hours before the court date?”

Cari Mahler, the assistant DA who handled the case during a 2010 post-conviction hearing, said in an email that no exculpatory evidence was withheld. “The evidence overwhelmingly established that Lavar Brown was the mastermind behind the robbery plot that resulted in the victim’s brutal murder,” she said.

She accused the DA’s Office of improperly disclosing internal communications and seeking to circumvent the judiciary rather than hold a complete adversarial hearing.

Lavar Brown was one of four people convicted of Richardson’s murder, a plot in which Christopher Kennedy was supposed to shoot the store manager in the leg but ended up shooting him in the head. Kennedy was caught fleeing the store with a gun and cash. Brothers James and Jamaar Richardson, who admitted to roles in the robbery, were also convicted. (They are not related to Michael Richardson.)

The case against Lavar Brown was the thinnest of the group, according to the CIU: He was convicted based only on the testimony of two unindicted coconspirators. The CIU now says trial prosecutors hid the fact that one of them, Kyonna Lyons, had given a previous, conflicting statement to Malone and Detective David Baker. Baker and Malone, according to the DA’s filing, said they didn’t document that statement because they believed she was lying. The CIU said the trial prosecutors also hid that the other informant, Ronald Vann, had cooperated in multiple cases and had lied in his statement on the Rite Aid case by falsely implicating an additional person.

Malone said the CIU did not give him the opportunity to review the file but added, “I am confident that their representation about exculpatory evidence is false.”

When the information about Lyons’ prior statement came to light, prosecutors debated how to proceed. In a 2010 email to his colleagues, included in the DA’s court filings, then-homicide unit deputy chief Ed Cameron said the omissions were acceptable.

The battle in Philly DA’s Office: Conviction Integrity Unit report shows rocky path to reform
“We never advise defense attorneys about [prior inconsistent statements],” wrote Cameron, who died last year. He said the “only issue is” that Brown’s lawyers found out. He even suggested retaliating against Lyons’ lawyer, Funt: “If Funt is going to come in and say things to hurt us, we should not give him deals in the future. Also, maybe we should send a detective to go interview him.”

That Brown will remain on death row no matter the outcome of this case, CIU supervisor Patricia Cummings said, did not factor into the decision to agree to a new trial. “When we have evidence of this kind of misconduct, you have to act on it,” she said. “He didn’t get a fair trial, period.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that prosecutors must disclose evidence favorable to a defendant — including evidence that may cast doubt on the integrity of a witness. R. Michael Cassidy, a professor of law specializing in prosecutorial ethics at Boston College, said evidence that witnesses lied falls squarely into that disclosure requirement.

‘Lying now, or lying then?’ Under Pa. rules, many are convicted on recanted statements.
Police, he said, have often avoided writing down contradictory statements so they would not have to disclose them, he said. “That is completely inconsistent with the Supreme Court precedent. It doesn’t matter if the statement is oral or written. That’s impeachment material that the other side is entitled to know about.”

In Brown’s case, the court has not yet determined whether to accept the DA’s agreement to a new trial — or decided whether to act on Richardson’s request to conflict the DA out of the case, or have him removed because of a conflict of interest.

Cassidy said there might be a basis for the allegation that Krasner has a conflict under Pennsylvania’s rules of professional conduct. The rule bars a lawyer from representing a client if doing so would conflict with a personal interest — in this case, Krasner’s loyalty to his ex-partner. But, Cassidy added, he believes such a claim is unlikely to succeed, especially because courts have traditionally been reluctant to conflict out government lawyers.

Cummings said there is no conflict, because Funt’s and Long’s involvement ended before either worked with Krasner. A Krasner spokesperson declined to provide a written conflict policy but said all relevant cases are referred to the DA’s chief ethics officer for a “rigorous conflicts screening process.”

It will be up to Common Pleas Court Judge Scott DiClaudio, who repeatedly sparred with Krasner after the DA unsuccessfully sought to have him removed from criminal court over his own purported conflict. (DiClaudio’s then-girlfriend had filed an employment discrimination complaint against the DA’s Office.)

DiClaudio scheduled a hearing for December on whether to remove the case from the DA’s Office and refer it to the attorney general. He asked Krasner to testify.

“It makes sense for him to explain in open court to the widow that his office should be making a decision in his ex-partner’s cases,” DiClaudio said in court.

Cummings called the conflict question a distraction from the larger issues raised by the case: “It really does potentially call into question homicide convictions where cooperators were used. We know that the cops have lied and cheated for a long time … but in this case you have for the first time documentation of the extent to which prosecutors were playing this game, as well.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime…edgdhp&pc=U531

Dustin Briggs Pennsylvania Death Row

dustin briggs pennsylvania

Dustin Briggs was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for the murders of two police officers. According to court documents Dustin Briggs would open fire killing the two police officers who were attempting to serve a warrant. Dustin Briggs would be arrested days later and would later be convicted and sentenced to death. Dustin Briggs death sentence was vacated at one point however he remains on Pennsylvania death row

Dustin Briggs 2022 Information

Parole Number: 583GG
Age: 44
Date of Birth: 01/13/1977
Race/Ethnicity: WHITE
Height: 5′ 08″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: MEDIUM
Current Location: PHOENIX

Dustin Briggs More News

A judge has vacated the death sentence of a man convicted of killing two Bradford County sheriff’s deputies.

The ruling generated both outrage and joy.

Dustin Briggs, formerly of Wells Township, was convicted by a Bradford County jury in 2006 for the March 31, 2004 shooting deaths of deputies Michael VanKuren, 36, of Warren Center, and Christopher M. Burgert, 30, of Sayre.

The deputies were shot and killed while trying to serve two warrants at Briggs’ home on Congdon Road in Wells Township. Briggs was caught several days later after a massive manhunt.

The Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office prosecuted the case after then-Bradford County District Attorney Stephen Downs recused himself because of his close relationship with the sheriff’s office.

Centre County Judge David Grine, who was assigned to hear Briggs’ appeal, recently set aside the death penalty based on a technicality, according to current Bradford County District Attorney Daniel Barrett, who received notice of the decision.

“The petition asserts there was one death penalty decision given to the jury by court instructions, which would seem to be practical at the time,” Barrett said. “As far as factors regarding the death penalty, there were multiple victims and they were police officers. The (petition) said that process was improper. There should have been a separate decision on imposing the death penalty for the murder of each officer.”

Instead of the death penalty, Briggs’ sentence was changed to life in prison without parole, Barrett said.

Briggs’ petition also asked that the conviction itself be overturned. That aspect is being handled in a separate appeal, Barrett said.

In the meantime, Dustin Briggs is serving his sentence at the Greene correctional facility, near Waynesburg.

It’s been more than 20 years since Pennsylvania executed an inmate, and for practical purposes the only change is that Dustin Briggs will now be housed with the general prison population rather than the restricted living arrangements where death row inmates serve, Barrett said.

The ruling is just the first step toward a new trial and hopefully exoneration for Briggs, according to his sister, Sara Seymour.

“Our family is overjoyed at this turn of events. The judge’s decision to invalidate Dustin’s death sentence gives us hope of a new trial,” Seymour said.

“Dustin’s removal from death row is the first step of his removal from prison altogether. We are confident that his lawyers are working toward his release,” she said. “Beside the fact that over 30 of his civil rights were violated during the trial, and the widespread opinion that the trial should never have been held in Bradford County, is the fact that Dustin did not commit these crimes.”

But the judge’s ruling did not sit well with the law enforcement community, including Bradford County Sheriff C.J. Walters, who knew and worked with both Burgert and VanKuren.

“Obviously it’s shocking news to all of us and I think it’s a bad decision by the judge,” Walters said. “There’s a system in place for trial by a jury by your peers and he was convicted. They made the decision for a death sentence and now because of a technicality, a judge reversed the decision. It’s not fair to the system. He got a fair trial, but because of a technicality, a judge undermined what the jury’s contentions were. It’s shocking and it’s sad. Obviously there’s some anger because it’s not fair

https://www.stargazette.com/story/news/public-safety/2017/04/12/death-sentence-vacated-dustin-briggs/100366708/

Richard Boxley Pennsylvania Death Row

richard boxley pennsylvania

Richard Boxley was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for the murder of Jarvay Bolton. According to court documents Richard Boxley and Jose Busanet made a plan to murder the victim over a drug deal. Richard Boxley and Jose Busanet would fatally shoot the victim in broad daylight. Jose Busanet and Richard Boxley would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Richard Boxley 2022 Information

Parole Number: EL5206
Age: 53
Date of Birth: 04/27/1968
Race/Ethnicity: BLACK
Height: 5′ 10″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: MEDIUM
Current Location: PHOENIX

Richard Boxley More News

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the death sentence for a New York City man who shot and killed a Reading man in broad daylight in a drug dispute in July 1997.

Richard Boxley, 36, had appealed a Sept. 28, 2004, death sentence that Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl ordered after a jury convicted Boxley and sentenced him to death.

It was the second time Boxley was sentenced to death for killing Jarvay “Jason” Bolton, 24, of 1001 Chestnut St. on July 11, 1997.

Boxley was first convicted in 2000 of first-degree murder and sentenced to death, but the Supreme Court overturned the sentence, ruling Judge Stephen B. Lieberman did not let the lawyers question each potential juror in detail.

According to testimony:

Richard Boxley plotted with Jose Busanet of Reading, also known as Tito Black, to kill Bolton. They went with Wilson Melendez, a friend of Busanet’s, to the 100 block of South Sixth Street in the middle of the afternoon.

When Bolton approached, Boxley and Busanet began firing. Bolton died of gunshot wounds to his chest.

Busanet, 31, was convicted and sentenced to death.

He is on death row in the State Correctional Institution at Greensburg, Greene County.

Melendez, 26, is serving three to six years in state prison after pleading guilty to conspiring to commit the murder.

http://www2.readingeagle.com/article.aspx?id=93686

Jose Busanet 2022 Information

jose busanet pennsylvania death row

Parole Number: 046CM
Age: 49
Date of Birth: 12/25/1972
Race/Ethnicity: HISPANIC
Height: 5′ 07″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: LIGHT
Current Location: PHOENIX