Angela West and Shamira Buford are two women from Missouri who have been charged with the murder of a five year old girl. According to police reports a child would tell his teacher that his sister was unconscious and unresponsive at their home. The teacher would call police and when they went to the residence another of the five year old sibling would tell officers that her sister was dead.
The five year old girl was allegedly hogtied and gagged with a sock to prevent her from stealing food. Two women in the home. Angela West and Shamira Buford would be arrested and have been charged with second-degree murder, first-degree involuntary manslaughter, abuse or neglect of a child – resulting in death and first-degree endangering the welfare of a child in connection with the little girl’s death
The other children in the home were taken from the residence and put into care with emergency services
Angela West and Shamira Buford More News
Two women in Waynesville have been charged and arrested after a 5-year-old girl was found dead Tuesday.
Shamira Buford, 36, and Angela West, 40, were both charged with second-degree murder, first-degree involuntary manslaughter, abuse or neglect of a child – resulting in death and first-degree endangering the welfare of a child. Both are being held at the Pulaski County Jail without bond, according to the prosecutor’s Facebook page.
A Waynesville Schools school resource officer contacted the Waynesville Police Department after a student told him he found his 5-year-old sister on the floor with a sock in her mouth, according to the probable cause statement. The SRO told police the student had tried to conduct CPR, the statement says.
A Waynesville police officer went to the home in the 700 block of Washington Street and made contact with someone who said a child was found dead. That person allegedly told police, “she choked,” according to the statement.
Police entered the home and made contact with Buford and West, who were asleep in a bedroom. Buford left the room and found the child, lifeless under a blanket in the living room. The coroner was called in.
An officer noticed “significant” marks on her wrists, ankles and neck, as well as a gray sock with blood on it next to the body. It was also “saturated with an unknown substance,” according to the statement. Fibers were allegedly found in the girl’s mouth and nylon rope was found in the home.
An official from the Children’s Division went to the Waynesville Sixth Grade Center and talked with a sibling. He said his step mother woke him up that morning, he brushed his teeth and then started speaking to his sister.
“And then I saw my little sister over there tied up,” the probable cause statement says.
The student said the girl gets up in the middle of the night and “steals” and said “we have to tie her up to the futon.”
Another sibling said she, Angela West and Shamira Buford had been tying the girl to the bed for the past three months. She stated when she woke up Tuesday morning, the girl’s lips were purple, she wasn’t moving and had no pulse. One person allegedly performed CPR before another took over. She said she didn’t call 911 because she didn’t know how to tell her mom the girl died.
That person allegedly told police, “She (the girl) has a sticky fingers problem so the solution my parents came up with was to tie her arms behind back and tie her to the bed.”
She said Angela West came up with the idea, the statement says.
“I had to tie her up because Angie has back problems,” she said in the probable cause statement.
Police asked if she was explicitly told to tie her up that night.
“No, I just know that every night I’m supposed to tie her up,” she said in the statement. She said Angela West instructed her to “hogtie” the girl, which including tying a short rope to the bar of the futon and around her neck. Just the girl’s head was the only body part that was on the bed when police found her.
At the Waynesville Police Department, West allegedly told police the girl had been getting tied up around her waist. She allegedly said that she and Buford resorted to tying up the girl because she had allegedly been taking food at night. West also claimed it had been at least a week since she tied up the girl, according to the probable cause statement.
Buford allegedly told police that she told “them” to stop tying the girl’s neck when she noticed marks on her neck.
Angela West claimed they put a sock in the girl’s mouth because she was loud at night.
“I made a smart ass comment about it one night and just went from there,” West allegedly told police, according to the statement.
“We got tired of telling her to be quiet,” the probable cause statement says Buford said.
Angela West also claimed she taught one of the siblings how to tie knots.
“She used one of the knots I taught her but never told her to tie her neck,” the statement says.
West allegedly told police, “I thought she was OK because she could breathe through her nose.”
Ethan Colpetzer was a janitor at Claysburg-Kimmel Elementary School in Blair County Pennsylvania has been charged with possession of child pornography however this story becomes much more creepy. According to police reports an eleven year old female student at Claysburg-Kimmel Elementary School reported that someone was leaving gifts on her desk and claiming to be a secret admirer. Well an investigation would begin which would lead to Ethan Colpetzer.
When police went to the home of Ethan Colpetzer they would discover child pornography on his devices and the janitor would be arrested. Ethan Colpetzer would be charged with 75 counts of sexual abuse of children, as well as attempted corruption of a minor and copying obscene material
Needless to say once Ethan Colpetzer gets out of prison he will be looking for a new job
Ethan Colpetzer More News
A Pennsylvania elementary school janitor allegedly left gifts, candy and notes for an 11-year-old girl as her “secret admirer” for a month and had more than 70 sexually explicit images of children on his phone, according to prosecutors.
Ethan Colpetzer, a 30-year-old janitor at Claysburg-Kimmel Elementary School, was arrested and charged with 75 counts of sexual abuse of children, as well as attempted corruption of a minor and copying obscene material.
He allegedly “singled out” a girl to other employees, asking for her name, and was allegedly caught by a faculty member taking photos of a student in the cafeteria, according to prosecutors in the Blair County District Attorney’s Office.
After a month of receiving secret gifts, the girl left a note for her “admirer” and asked what his name was. He wrote back, “Ethan,” which raised a teacher’s suspicion because there were no students with that name, prosecutors said.
A school resource officer investigating the accusations found a “zoomed-in” photo of a girl bent over at the lunch table, according to the police report.
The school resource officer also allegedly found a picture of a nude, unidentified child, which prompted a multi-department child pornography investigation.
Police executed a search warrant for Colpetzer’s phone and found 74 photos of “young children performing sexual acts,” according to prosecutors.
Police say Colpetzer admitted to saving the pictures from the internet and leaving the gifts for the 11-year-old girl, prosecutors aid.
Police arrested Colpetzer on March 7. He was arraigned and placed in Blair County Prison with bail set at $100,000.
Claysburg-Kimmel School District officials said in a statement that Colpetzer was placed on leave from his job at the elementary school, which includes students in kindergarten through sixth grade.
First Assistant District Attorney Nichole Smith told local news outlet WTAJ in a statement that “the safety of our community, especially our children, is one of the most important responsibilities we have as prosecutors.”
“As such, the prosecution of those who possess child pornography will always be a priority for the Blair County District Attorney’s Office,” Smith said. “Possessing such images is neither a minor offense nor a victimless crime. The District Attorney’s Office commends the Claysburg-Kimmel school staff whose vigilance and quick action allowed police to rapidly preserve and recover evidence.”
“We are disturbed and disheartened by the information included in the allegations and wish to note that we have not received any further reports or other information suggesting that any Claysburg-Kimmel School District student was made subject to any form of inappropriate contact other than that which has already been reported,” school officials told WTAJ.
“We share in the District Attorney’s commendation of our staff whose vigilance and prompt reporting of the matter allowed for investigation and appropriate action to be taken as quickly as possible.”
Jessica Sanchez was the Principal at Travis Elementary in Baytown Texas until she was busted for having cocaine inside of the school. According to police reports Jessica Sanchez allegedly brought cocaine into Travis Elementary and the drugs were found in a school bathroom. Needless to say Elementary Schools are suppose to be a drug free zone so she was charged with possession of a control substance in a drug free zone. Not sure if Jessica Sanchez has been fired or suspended until her case works its way through the courts.
Jessica Sanchez More News
A Texas elementary school principal has been arrested for allegedly bringing cocaine to campus, according to reports Wednesday.
Jessica Sanchez is charged with possession of a controlled substance in a drug-free zone, KTRK-TV first reported. She was arrested after an employee found the drugs in a restroom at Travis Elementary in Baytown, Texas.
“We will not, under any circumstances, tolerate this type of behavior in our schools. Our campuses are a safe haven for students, and we will not have students in unsafe environments,” the Goose Creek Consolidated ISD said in a statement.
Court records cited by the outlet say Sanchez has posted a $5,000 and was expected to be released.
Sanchez’s page on Travis Elementary’s official website has been removed.
GCCISD referred Fox News Digital to the district’s police department, which did not respond to a request for comment.
Officials told KXXV the incident is being reported to the Texas Education Agency’s Division of Investigation. Fox News Digital has reached out to the agency for comment.
Baytown is approximately 30 miles east of Houston.
Arthur Brown who was sentenced to death by the State of Texas is scheduled to be executed tonight, March 9 2023. According to court documents Marion Dudley, Arthur Brown Jr., and Tony Dunson would go to a residence on Brownstone Lane in Houston Texas. Six people inside of the residence would be tied up and shot. Four of the six would die from their injuries. Marion Dudley would be convicted and sentenced to death and executed back in 2006. Tony Dunson would plead guilty and testify against the other two for a reduced sentence and would be sentenced to life with parole eligibility in 2026. Arthur Brown would be convicted and sentenced to death.
Arthur Brown lawyers are attempting to get his case back in the courts in order to delay the execution or to get his death sentence overturned by claiming that their client is innocent and due to a mental impairment should not be executed. Arthur Brown has been on death row for 30 years
Arthur Brown Execution More News
On Thursday evening, Texas plans to execute Arthur Brown Jr. for the 1992 shooting deaths of four Houstonians in a drug house.
Though Arthur Brown has been on death row for nearly 30 years, legal claims filed after new death penalty public defenders took over the case last year make several dramatic arguments, including that Brown is innocent of the murders. Last week, Texas’ Office of Capital and Forensic Writs asked courts to halt Brown’s execution, arguing Houston prosecutors for decades hid evidence pointing to another suspect.
The attorneys also argue Arthur Brown is intellectually disabled to the point where it is unconstitutional to execute him under previous court rulings. And they claim Brown’s trial was tainted by racism, saying a white juror has since said she knew immediately the Black defendant was a “thug” and had no doubt he would kill again.
“Arthur Brown Jr. is an innocent and intellectually disabled man incarcerated on Texas’s death row as a result of sloppy police work, prosecutorial suppression of exculpatory evidence, corrupted eyewitness identifications, [and] false forensic testimony,” the public defenders said in their filings last week.
So far, the appeals have been unsuccessful in state and federal courts, with judges largely saying the claims did not clear the high bar to consider appeals this late.
Harris County prosecutors deny they shielded evidence, saying attorneys could have found a witness interview pointing to another suspect earlier. The district attorney’s office also disputes that Arthur Brown qualifies as intellectually disabled and argued the racial bias claim could have been raised earlier in the decades since Brown was sentenced.
“Simply put, the applicant’s ‘new’ evidence is of little value, and pales in comparison to the weight of inculpatory evidence,” prosecutors said.
As of Wednesday evening, Arthur Brown had a final plea pending at the U.S. Supreme Court regarding his intellectual disability claim. If the high court rejects it, the 52-year-old man will be executed after 6 p.m. in the Huntsville prison’s death chamber.
Arthur Brown and two other men were convicted in the 1992 execution-style killings of Jose Guadalupe Tovar, Jessica Quinones, Audrey Brown and Frank Farias. The four victims each were tied up in Tovar’s Houston home and shot in the back of the head.
Tovar and his wife, Rachel, were known drug dealers who supplied cocaine and marijuana to Brown and the other men, according to court documents. Rachel Tovar and Nicolas Cortez were also shot in the head but survived.
The murders and Brown’s subsequent trial were sensational, with allegations of police and prosecutorial coercion of witnesses, shocking recantations on the stand and Brown’s sister jailed in contempt and later charged with perjury.
Three of Brown’s sisters testified for the state, placing Brown at one of their houses in Houston the night of the murders after a drug buy, according to court documents. Two said he offered to pay them to take his van filled with drugs back to where he lived in Alabama, while he flew home the next day.
After being held in contempt for initially refusing to testify despite having been granted immunity, one sister, Carolyn Momoh, testified that Arthur Brown had told her he had “shot six Mexicans.” On cross-examination, Momoh said her earlier statement was false, and she and the other sister said on the stand that they testified because police had threatened to take their kids away if they did not.“I was told I had to testify to that statement,” Momoh said, according to the filing. She was later prosecuted on a perjury charge for changing her testimony.
Two other men, Marion Dudley and Antonio Dunson, were also convicted of capital murder in the case. Dudley, who maintained his innocence until his death, was executed in 2006. Dunson is serving a life sentence.
Defense attorneys have always considered the case against Brown flimsy at best. Aside from the recanted testimony, prosecutors largely relied on eyewitness accounts by the slayings’ two survivors, both of whom had questionable recall after being shot in the head.
At trial, Rachel Tovar and Cortez both identified Brown as their assailant, but Tovar gave conflicting information to police in the hospital, and Cortez had earlier failed to pick Brown out of a photo lineup, according to court filings. In Dunson’s subsequent trial, Cortez again failed to identify Brown from photos.
The physical evidence tied to the murders — guns believed to be tied to Brown and believed to have fired the fatal rounds — were recovered elsewhere, including on another man after he was killed in a similar attempted robbery at a drug dealer’s house in Alabama. That man, Terrell Hill, was the focus of the defense’s theory at trial, pinning him as the likely shooter.
The science used to connect the guns to the bullets found at the scene was later discredited on appeals, but the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals still upheld Brown’s sentence. The judges ruled the jury still likely would have convicted Brown without the ballistic evidence.
But in a police interview kept out of trial and undisclosed to Brown’s attorneys until this year, the son of Rachel Tovar said his mother used a nickname for Hill when describing her assailants to police in the hospital. She told police in one interview she heard the nicknames “Red” and “Squirt” being used in the attack and that her son would know them from answering the door.
When police interviewed her son, Anthony Farias, he repeatedly said Red’s real name was “Terrell,” according to Brown’s new filing. Prosecutors did not call Farias to testify at trial, which meant they did not have to give defense attorneys a copy of his interview — a point Brown’s lawyers called into question at trial.
“They took a two-hour video tape of Anthony Farias. What did Anthony Farias have that was so important that they videotaped it and why isn’t he here to testify?” the prisoner’s attorney said at his 1993 trial, according to court records.
Now, Brown’s attorneys say the evidence requires a renewed look at his innocence claim.
“Mr. Brown presents to this Court long-suppressed information by the Harris County District Attorney’s Office (HCDAO) pointing to Marcus Terrell Hill, a Tuscaloosa drug dealer who was shot and killed trying to rob a crack house in Alabama while in possession of the alleged murder weapon in this case, as the party responsible for the murders for which Mr. Brown and his co-defendants were wrongly convicted,” public defenders wrote in appeals last week.
Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg’s office said the interview could have been acquired by appellate attorneys years ago when lawyers conducted public information reviews of the state files. It’s unclear if the video tape was in the case file at that time. The state also said Faria’s testimony would have added little weight anyway, as it was hearsay.
Plus, prosecutors said Hill had an alibi. His cousin had said, backed up by rental car records, they arrived in Houston the day before the murders but couldn’t find a hotel room so they drove back to Alabama, according to court records.
Ogg’s office stood behind Brown’s conviction, noting that Brown’s friends referred to him as Squirt, and prosecutors credited Rachel Tovar and Cortez’s visual identifications of Brown. The state also continued to point to Momoh’s quickly recanted testimony, saying Brown told her he shot Mexicans and that her gun had gone missing.
“Victims’ rights matter,” said Assistant District Attorney Joshua Reiss. “The victims in this case have suffered for decades from the carnage that Arthur Brown Jr. caused them to live with.”
Aside from Brown’s innocence claim, his attorneys have also attempted to halt his execution on claims that he is intellectually disabled.
Since 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court has barred the execution of those with an intellectual disability, deeming it violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban against cruel and unusual punishment.
In Brown’s case, attorneys provided evidence that Brown had been in special education classes since he was a young child and was deemed “educable mentally retarded” in elementary school. In third grade, his IQ was measured at 70, generally considered within the range of intellectual disability. Brown’s attorneys also note he was typically thought of as “slow” throughout his life, and his friends and family learned to talk to him in simple language.
Prosecutors countered that Arthur Brown was not intellectually disabled but instead had a learning disability. They noted that his IQ scores in middle school bumped up to the high 80s, with the school psychologist suggesting he be moved from the class for the “mentally retarded” to a class for students with learning disabilities.
In his final appeal, Brown’s attorneys are hoping the disability claim will prompt the nation’s high court to halt his execution. For years, the high court has knocked the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ methods for determining such disabilities, sending one case back repeatedly.
“No court has ever heard the merits of this Eighth Amendment claim because the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA) has applied a novel procedural bar to his ID claim, wholly inconsistent with its practice in numerous other cases,” Brown’s lawyers said in their Wednesday filing.
Texas has executed an inmate convicted of the drug-related killings of four people more than 30 years ago, including a woman who was nine months pregnant.
Arthur Brown Jr., 52, insisted he was innocent before receiving a lethal injection Thursday evening at the state penitentiary in Huntsville. He was condemned for the June 1992 slayings, which took place in a Houston home during a drug robbery.
Authorities said Brown was part of a ring that shuttled drugs from Texas to Alabama and had bought drugs from Jose Tovar and his wife Rachel Tovar.
Killed during the drug robbery were 32-year-old Jose Tovar; his wife’s 17-year-old son, Frank Farias; 19-year-old Jessica Quiñones, the pregnant girlfriend of another son of Rachel Tovar; and 21-year-old neighbor Audrey Brown. All four had been tied up and shot in the head. Rachel Tovar and another person were also shot but survived.
“I don’t see how anybody could have just killed a pregnant woman and then made her suffer so much. It’s just beyond words,” Quiñones’ older sister, Maricella Quiñones, said before the execution.
Brown was the fifth inmate put to death in Texas this year and the ninth in the U.S. His execution was the second of two in Texas this week. Another inmate, Gary Green, was executed Tuesday for killing his estranged wife and her young daughter
Brown was defiant in his final statement.
“What is happening here tonight isn’t justice,” he said. “It’s the murder of another innocent man.”
He said he’d proved his innocence “but the courts blocked me.”
Texas executes man convicted of killing 4, including woman who was 9 months pregnant
March 9, 2023 / 9:16 PM / AP
Texas has executed an inmate convicted of the drug-related killings of four people more than 30 years ago, including a woman who was nine months pregnant.
Arthur Brown Jr., 52, insisted he was innocent before receiving a lethal injection Thursday evening at the state penitentiary in Huntsville. He was condemned for the June 1992 slayings, which took place in a Houston home during a drug robbery.
Authorities said Brown was part of a ring that shuttled drugs from Texas to Alabama and had bought drugs from Jose Tovar and his wife Rachel Tovar.
Killed during the drug robbery were 32-year-old Jose Tovar; his wife’s 17-year-old son, Frank Farias; 19-year-old Jessica Quiñones, the pregnant girlfriend of another son of Rachel Tovar; and 21-year-old neighbor Audrey Brown. All four had been tied up and shot in the head. Rachel Tovar and another person were also shot but survived.
“I don’t see how anybody could have just killed a pregnant woman and then made her suffer so much. It’s just beyond words,” Quiñones’ older sister, Maricella Quiñones, said before the execution.
Brown was the fifth inmate put to death in Texas this year and the ninth in the U.S. His execution was the second of two in Texas this week. Another inmate, Gary Green, was executed Tuesday for killing his estranged wife and her young daughter.
FILE – This undated photo provided by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice shows Arthur Brown Jr. Texas Department of Criminal Justice via AP
Brown was defiant in his final statement.
“What is happening here tonight isn’t justice,” he said. “It’s the murder of another innocent man.”
He said he’d proved his innocence “but the courts blocked me.”
“The state hid the evidence so long and good that my own attorneys couldn’t find it,” he said in a loud voice, looking at the ceiling of the death chamber while strapped to a gurney and not making any eye contact with a half-dozen relatives of his victims who watched through a window a few feet from him.
As the lethal dose of the sedative pentobarbital took effect, he took two deep breaths, gasped and then began snoring. After six snores all movement stopped. He was pronounced dead 17 minutes later, at 6:37 p.m.
Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, who was among the execution witnesses, disputed Brown’s claims of innocence.
“He has been the beneficiary of a judicial system that bent over backward at the local, state and federal levels, all the way to the United States Supreme Court, who have all affirmed his conviction and sentence,” she said.
Three members of Jessica Quinones’ family, including her mother, also were among the witnesses and released a statement saying the day was neither one of joy nor celebration but “profound relief and gratitude.”
“After 30 years of anguish and uncertainty, we are finally able to rest knowing the monster who destroyed so many lives will never again torment the body or soul of another,” they said.
The U.S. Supreme Court earlier Thursday declined an appeal from Brown’s attorneys to halt the execution. They had argued that Brown was exempt from execution because he was intellectually disabled, a claim disputed by prosecutors. The high court has prohibited the death penalty for the intellectually disabled.
“Mr. Brown’s intellectual limitations were known to his friends and family. … Individuals that knew Mr. Brown over the course of his life have described him consistently as ‘slow,'” his attorneys wrote in their petition to the Supreme Court.
One of Brown’s accomplices in the shootings, Marion Dudley, was executed in 2006. A third partner was sentenced to life in prison.
Brown, who was from Tuscaloosa, Alabama, had long maintained another person committed the killings.
Brown’s attorneys had previously filed other appeals that had been rejected by lower courts. They argued he was innocent and that a witness actually implicated another suspect. They also claimed Brown’s conviction was tainted by racial bias, alleging one of the jurors decided he was guilty because he was Black.
A judge in Houston on Tuesday denied a request by Brown’s attorneys for DNA testing of evidence that they said could have exonerated their client.
Josh Reiss, chief of the Post-Conviction Writs Division with the Harris County District Attorney’s Office in Houston, called Brown’s last-minute appeals a delay tactic.
Reiss said school records submitted at Brown’s trial showed while the inmate was initially thought to possibly be intellectually disabled in the third grade, by ninth grade that was no longer the case. The prosecutor also said Brown’s claims of innocence were problematic as the other suspect alleged to be the killer was found by investigators to not have been in Houston at the time.
Texas executes man convicted of killing 4, including woman who was 9 months pregnant
March 9, 2023 / 9:16 PM / AP
Texas has executed an inmate convicted of the drug-related killings of four people more than 30 years ago, including a woman who was nine months pregnant.
Arthur Brown Jr., 52, insisted he was innocent before receiving a lethal injection Thursday evening at the state penitentiary in Huntsville. He was condemned for the June 1992 slayings, which took place in a Houston home during a drug robbery.
Authorities said Brown was part of a ring that shuttled drugs from Texas to Alabama and had bought drugs from Jose Tovar and his wife Rachel Tovar.
Killed during the drug robbery were 32-year-old Jose Tovar; his wife’s 17-year-old son, Frank Farias; 19-year-old Jessica Quiñones, the pregnant girlfriend of another son of Rachel Tovar; and 21-year-old neighbor Audrey Brown. All four had been tied up and shot in the head. Rachel Tovar and another person were also shot but survived.
“I don’t see how anybody could have just killed a pregnant woman and then made her suffer so much. It’s just beyond words,” Quiñones’ older sister, Maricella Quiñones, said before the execution.
Brown was the fifth inmate put to death in Texas this year and the ninth in the U.S. His execution was the second of two in Texas this week. Another inmate, Gary Green, was executed Tuesday for killing his estranged wife and her young daughter.
FILE – This undated photo provided by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice shows Arthur Brown Jr. Texas Department of Criminal Justice via AP
Brown was defiant in his final statement.
“What is happening here tonight isn’t justice,” he said. “It’s the murder of another innocent man.”
He said he’d proved his innocence “but the courts blocked me.”
“The state hid the evidence so long and good that my own attorneys couldn’t find it,” he said in a loud voice, looking at the ceiling of the death chamber while strapped to a gurney and not making any eye contact with a half-dozen relatives of his victims who watched through a window a few feet from him.
As the lethal dose of the sedative pentobarbital took effect, he took two deep breaths, gasped and then began snoring. After six snores all movement stopped. He was pronounced dead 17 minutes later, at 6:37 p.m.
Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, who was among the execution witnesses, disputed Brown’s claims of innocence.
“He has been the beneficiary of a judicial system that bent over backward at the local, state and federal levels, all the way to the United States Supreme Court, who have all affirmed his conviction and sentence,” she said.
Three members of Jessica Quinones’ family, including her mother, also were among the witnesses and released a statement saying the day was neither one of joy nor celebration but “profound relief and gratitude.”
“After 30 years of anguish and uncertainty, we are finally able to rest knowing the monster who destroyed so many lives will never again torment the body or soul of another,” they said.
The U.S. Supreme Court earlier Thursday declined an appeal from Brown’s attorneys to halt the execution. They had argued that Brown was exempt from execution because he was intellectually disabled, a claim disputed by prosecutors. The high court has prohibited the death penalty for the intellectually disabled.
“Mr. Brown’s intellectual limitations were known to his friends and family. … Individuals that knew Mr. Brown over the course of his life have described him consistently as ‘slow,'” his attorneys wrote in their petition to the Supreme Court.
One of Brown’s accomplices in the shootings, Marion Dudley, was executed in 2006. A third partner was sentenced to life in prison.
Brown, who was from Tuscaloosa, Alabama, had long maintained another person committed the killings.
Brown’s attorneys had previously filed other appeals that had been rejected by lower courts. They argued he was innocent and that a witness actually implicated another suspect. They also claimed Brown’s conviction was tainted by racial bias, alleging one of the jurors decided he was guilty because he was Black.
A judge in Houston on Tuesday denied a request by Brown’s attorneys for DNA testing of evidence that they said could have exonerated their client.
Josh Reiss, chief of the Post-Conviction Writs Division with the Harris County District Attorney’s Office in Houston, called Brown’s last-minute appeals a delay tactic.
Reiss said school records submitted at Brown’s trial showed while the inmate was initially thought to possibly be intellectually disabled in the third grade, by ninth grade that was no longer the case. The prosecutor also said Brown’s claims of innocence were problematic as the other suspect alleged to be the killer was found by investigators to not have been in Houston at the time.
“It was an absolutely brutal mass murder,” Reiss said, adding: “These families deserve justice.”
Maricella Quiñones said her sister was an innocent victim who wasn’t aware the Tovars were dealing drugs from the home. She said her mother also blames the Tovars for what happened.
“My mother’s not the same since my sister passed away,” she said.
She described her sister as a “very loving, caring person” who had looked forward to being a mother.
She said her family would likely never get closure.
“We lost two persons. Alyssa never got a chance at life,” she said, referring to her sister’s unborn child.
Brown was one of six Texas death row inmates participating in a lawsuit seeking to stop the state’s prison system from using what they allege are expired and unsafe execution drugs. Despite a civil court judge in Austin preliminarily agreeing with the claims, five of the inmates have been executed this year.
Jade Janks would murder her stepfather Thomas Merriman after discovering that he kept nude photos of her has learned how long she will spend in prison. According to court documents Jade Janks discovered that Thomas Merriman had nude photos of her as a teenager on his computer and was rightfully upset. However her way to deal with the betrayl was to murder her stepfather.
Jade Janks would give Thomas Merriman whiskey which was spiked with Ambien before strangling her stepfather. Thomas Merriman cause of death was determined to be acute intoxication by Ambien. His body would be discovered underneath a pile of garbage bags.
Jade Janks lawyers would attempt to justify her actions calling her stepfather a predator who kept hundreds of nude photos of her. However in the end the jury would find her guilty. Now Jade Janks has learned that she will spend life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years
Jade Janks More News
A Solana Beach, California woman who was convicted of drugging and strangling her stepfather to death after discovering a trove of nude pictures of herself in his possession was sentenced last week.
Jade Janks, 39, was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 25 years on Monday in the 2020 slaying of her 64-year-old stepfather, Thomas Merriman, San Diego television station KNSD reported. A jury found her guilty of first-degree murder in December.
On Jan. 2, 2021, police found Merriman, who co-founded a non-profit butterfly sanctuary, dead underneath bags of garbage in the driveway of their home. An autopsy revealed that Merriman died from acute intoxication by Ambien, The Coast News Group reported at the time.
According to Jade Janks, who testified on her own behalf at trial, she’d supplied her stepfather with whisky, fatally choked him and cut off his oxygen supply after discovering a series of illicit photographs of her as a teen on his computer while cleaning his home. The photos, which numbered in the hundreds, depicted Janks having consensual sex with a former boyfriend from years earlier.
During her sentencing, Janks, who at times became emotional, said Merriman was a serial predator.
“Tom came into my life when I was just a little girl and exerted influence during that early stage of development when I was just figuring things out,” Janks said. “Unfortunately that influence manifested itself into inappropriate touch, coercion, reckless behavior, and complete violation as what I now realize years of psychological manipulation. All of this came crashing down on me when I noticed hundreds of naked photos of myself on his computer and felt shattered.”
Janks also accused the late 64-year-old of having inappropriate contact with her when she was a minor.
“I’m still picking up the pieces and it’s my sincerest hope that over the next few years I can put the pieces back and heal from this trauma,” she added. “I’m sorry I didn’t act the way I was supposed to. I think about it every day since.”
Janks, who remained defiant that she was a victim in the case in her court address, also offered a partial apology to Merriman’s family.
“I understand you hate me for what you believe I did to Tom,” Janks told the court. “However, there’s a lot more than you will ever understand.”
Janks’ defense team, who also acknowledged her troubled childhood, echoing her claims that she’d been victimized by Merriman as a young girl, insisted she wasn’t guilty of murder.
“Something happened on this evening and it had a lot to do with her relationship with the victim,” attorney Marc Carlos said. “There is a lot of trauma in Jade Janks’ early life — we have outlined that in our sentencing memorandum to the court. There was some conduct between the victim and Ms. Janks in her teens — early teens. As well as some incidents that occurred after that. And those were the factors that basically went into play on the evening that Mr. Merriman died.”
Janks’ lawyers have vowed to appeal the sentence.
“Ms. Janks reacted in a way that was completely outside the way she would normally act,” her lawyers added. “She had, as the court is aware, she had family members that she could have called; she had lawyers that she could have called; there’s all kinds of people she could have called, however, she panicked under this reaction to the trauma that she had. And, as a result, she did things that made her appear to be complicit in the death of Mr. Merriman.”
In court, Janks’ father also referred to Merriman as a “sick, perverted individual,” according to Law&Crime.
Prosecutors, however, had maintained Janks was “beyond freaked out” after discovering the nude photographs on Merriman’s computer, stating that Janks plotted to kill her stepfather by making his death appear as an overdose. They accused Janks of suffocating Merriman using a plastic bag.
Numerous family and loved ones of Merriman spoke up on his behalf at Janks’ sentencing as well. Many called for the judge to impose a stiff punishment — and some discounted Janks’ account of the Dec. 31, 2020 killing altogether.
“I don’t believe the negative statements the murderer made about Tom,” one person stated in a victim impact statement. “I don’t believe she murdered him for the reasons she said she did. It’s a killer’s word against his. And he’s not here to defend himself.”
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.