Kevin Dowling Pennsylvania Death Row

kevin dowling pennsylvania

Kevin Dowling was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for the murder of a woman who was set to testify against him. According to court documents Kevin Dowling would sexually assault and rob a woman before taking off. Later Kevin Dowling would be recognized by the victim at the place where he worked and would call the police who would arrest Dowling. Dowling would be released from custody and would murder the victim to prevent her from testifying against him. Kevin Dowling would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Kevin Dowling 2022 Information

Parole Number: 849DV
Age: 63
Date of Birth: 06/12/1958
Race/Ethnicity: WHITE
Height: 5′ 11″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: LIGHT
Current Location: PHOENIX

Kevin Dowling More News

Kevin Dowling was convicted of killing a store clerk to prevent her testifying against him, the case featured on a recent episode of the Investigation Discovery series American Monster.

In 1996 Jennifer Myers was attacked at the Gray Fox Gallery in Spring Grove, PA, which she owned and operated. Her assailant had robbed and then attempted to rape her.

A few months later, Myers spotted her attacker working at a local gas station and called the police.

Dowling was charged with robbery and indecent assault, but Myers was found dead before the trial started. On October 20, 1997, she’d been shot in the head and chest at the same gallery where the attack had taken place.

During the trial, Dowling produced a videotape that he said showed he was away fishing at the time of the murder, however, detectives were not convinced, and experts examined the tape.

It took an astrophysicist recommended by NASA to work out using the sun that the time on the video did not match the actual time of day.

Kevin Dowling was found guilty of murder in 1998 and sentenced to death.

However, he continues to protest his innocence and has made various appeals complaining about his initial defense council.

He remains in prison, and there is currently a state ban on executions, so he’s likely to live out his remaining years in prison.

Kevin Dowling Other News

It was August 5th 1996, and 44-year-old Jennifer Myers was busy working at the art gallery she owned in the small borough of Spring Grove in York County, Pennsylvania. However, she could not have known as she carried out her daily routine at the Gray Fox Gallery that her life was about to change forever.

Without warning, a man wearing sunglasses burst in with a gun, tied Jennifer up and sexually assaulted her before robbing the gallery and fleeing. Stunned and horrified by her ordeal, she called the police and the search began for her mystery assailant.

It didn’t take long for a break in the case to arrive. As Jennifer was picking up some groceries at a Sheetz convenience store in nearby Hanover just a few days later, she was taken aback to recognise her attacker working there.

When Jennifer called the authorities, the member of staff was identified as local resident Kevin Brian Dowling. His car was towed and impounded, with officers finding a pair of sunglasses that matched those worn by Jennifer’s attacker inside. There was also rope that matched the bindings used on her during the assault and a newspaper clipping covering the crime.

Kevin Dowling was charged with robbery and attempted rape and, as preparations were made to build a case against him for trial, it seemed as though the victim was going to get the justice she deserved

Unfortunately, this was not the case. On October 20th 1997, just two days before Jennifer was set to testify against Kevin Dowling, her husband Steve went to visit her at the art gallery. To his horror, he walked towards the counter to find his wife’s body lying prone on the floor.

She had been shot once in the chest, once in the left shoulder and once in her left eye. Steven Myers reported the murder at 3:08 PM and, when police rushed to the scene, they found a number of eyewitnesses had seen the aftermath of the crime.

A woman said she had almost been struck by a car leaving the shopping centre where the Gray Fox Gallery was located, while a man reported seeing a man in a strange black wig hanging around at roughly the time of the murder.

Investigators were not particularly surprised when the female eyewitness identified Kevin Brian Dowling as the man who had nearly run her over. When they again searched his vehicle, they discovered a letter he had written to Jennifer ahead of the trial, apparently asking for her forgiveness.

Furthermore, his flannel shirt, pants, hat and sneakers all tested positive for gunshot residue. Once again, it looked as though this would be a straightforward case against Kevin Brian Dowling for the murder of the woman he had so viciously attacked the year before.

However, a surprise did arrive for investigators when they raided his home. As detailed in the TV series American Monster, Dowling’s wife was amazed and angry to find her husband accused of Jennifer’s murder.

She claimed he had been on a fishing trip that day — and she had the evidence that seemed to prove it. There was a home video that Kevin Dowling had made as he fished on the lake, complete with timestamps covering the time of the murder. Could it be that Dowling wasn’t responsible for the murder at all?

Somewhat thrown by this development, investigators were forced to take another look at the crime scene and take into consideration evidence that could show someone else had killed Jennifer. Steven Myers was brought in for questioning and became a suspect, especially when it was discovered that he owned a gun similar to the one that had killed his wife.

But forensic examiners still weren’t convinced over Kevin Dowling’s alibi. After all, he had a clear motive for wanting to get rid of Jennifer: her silence when it came to potentially convicting him of attempted rape and robbery.

Detectives returned to the VHS tape produced by Dowling’s wife and took another look at it. Wasn’t it strange that someone would create such an extensive record of a fishing trip, particularly one where nothing of note was caught? A few clips might be understandable to document a whopper, but hours of nothing seemed strange to want as a keepsake.

Then a sharp-eyed detective saw something else that was odd: the position of the sun appeared to alter within a few frames to be much lower in the sky, despite the timestamp still saying the footage was from before midday.

Galvanised, investigators consulted a university professor and NASA astrophysicist to analyse the footage. Using careful calculations, he confirmed their suspicions: some of the video had been shot much later in the afternoon than the rest. The timestamp had been tampered with and Kevin Dowling could still be the murderer.

When faced with this, Dowling confessed that he had altered the timestamp on the video. However, he insisted he had done so to conceal from his wife the fact that he had been at a Harrisburg strip club at the time, not so he could travel to the art gallery to murder Jennifer Myers.

“I was concerned she might wonder why there was a four hour time gap in the video, since we had argued in the past about my frequenting these places,” he commented in an online post.

Nevertheless, investigators first sent Dowling to trial for the original attempted rape, for which he was convicted in April 1998 and sentenced to nine to 18 years in prison. On October 26th 1998, they then tried him for Jennifer’s murder based on the forensic evidence and the admission that Dowling had lied about the videotape.

The prosecution argued that his motive was to prevent Jennifer from testifying against him at the trial for his attempted rape and robbery charges.

There was also another interesting clue in the case: a link to the long black wig eyewitnesses said they had seen a man wearing at approximately the time of the murder. According to detectives who had been involved in the search of the Dowlings’ home, a photograph had been found of their daughter wearing — as part of a fancy dress costume — a wig that matched the one they had been looking for.

It belonged to Mrs Dowling, who had lent it to a friend, who in turn told police that she had given it back to Kevin Dowling when she returned it. He could therefore have had it in his possession when Jennifer was killed.

Corporal Julio Mendez from Pennsylvania State Police told Investigation Discovery’s Solved this addressed the problem of their never having found the alleged disguise Dowling wore.

“We never had the wig, but we did have the wig because we had a photo of his daughter wearing the wig,” he commented wryly.

A jury decided that Kevin Brian Dowling was guilty of first-degree murder and, after finding one aggravating circumstance and no mitigating circumstances, returned a verdict of death. Despite an appeal, a court ruled there was sufficient evidence to support this and the conviction was upheld in September 2005.

During his time in prison, Kevin Dowling has continued to insist that he did not murder Jennifer Myers. In a blog post, he offers a detailed list of arguments against the evidence presented to convict him, including the notion that the timing of the murder means he could not have been the culprit.

Indeed, he claims he was still at the lake — regardless of the altered timestamps — at the time the eyewitness was supposedly being almost hit by his car. He also claims he finds it suspicious that Steven Myers found the body when he says he did, arguing that he was in fact the killer and snuck out of work to murder his wife.

Dowling maintains that too much emphasis was placed on the fishing video as evidence when his actual alibi would have been his presence at the strip bar.

There is also a ‘Free Kevin Brian Dowling’ Facebook page that suggests Jennifer’s killer was left-handed and told her during the attack that he didn’t want to return to prison — somewhere Dowling had never been — among other theories that aim to support his innocence.

At a post-conviction hearing as recently as July 2021, Dowling’s attorney requested a new trial on the grounds that false evidence was presented during trial and physical evidence from the car had been improperly admitted, the York Dispatch reported.

Judge Robert J Eby did not make a ruling at the hearing but said he would consider the request, although all previous appeals have failed so far. Dowling’s original execution date was set for February 27th 2007, but the law states that death row inmates must exhaust all post-conviction relief options before they can be put to death.

Meanwhile, there is currently a state ban on executions anyway. It therefore looks as though, unless Kevin Brian Dowling can successfully argue that he didn’t kill Jennifer Myers, he will spend the rest of his days at the SCI Phoenix prison in Collegeville.

For Jennifer Myers’ family, this will no doubt bring little in the way of comfort.

https://veritycreates.medium.com/the-vhs-tape-that-convicted-a-killer-757b1d66a665

Anthony Dick Pennsylvania Death Row

anthony dick pennsylvania

Anthony Dick was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for the murders of two children. According to court documents Anthony Dick was with his wife at a local motel where he would shoot her first before shooting the two sleeping children. His wife would survive the attack however the children did not. Anthony Dick would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Anthony Dick 2022 Information

Parole Number: 469FP
Age: 57
Date of Birth: 02/02/1964
Race/Ethnicity: WHITE
Height: 5′ 06″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: MEDIUM
Current Location: PHOENIX

Anthony Dick More News

A 43-year-old Bloomsburg man was sentenced to death Thursday by a Columbia County judge on two counts of first-degree murder.

Anthony J. Dick on Wednesday had pleaded guilty to killing his 18-month-old son and 4-year-old stepson as they slept at the Stone Castle Motel in early 2006.

He also pleaded guilty Wednesday to attempted murder and aggravated assault of his 23-year-old wife, Betty. Mr. Dick now awaits Judge Thomas A. James Jr.’s decision on those charges, according to the Columbia County court administrator’s office.

Mr. Dick reportedly asked Judge James for the death penalty Wednesday during his plea hearing, saying he wanted to be executed for what he did to his family.

The shooting attack took place in the early morning hours of Jan. 24, 2006, at the Stone Castle Motel along Route 11 just inside the Columbia County border.

Mr. Dick shot his wife twice with a .22-caliber handgun before shooting both sons while they slept, according to state police at Bloomsburg.

Mr. Dick then turned the gun on himself, state police said, and injured his stomach.

The two boys were found dead under blankets lying on the floor. Mrs. Dick escaped to a nearby motel room, where she and another lodger called for help.

Mrs. Dick was treated at Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, and has since been released. She reportedly attended the plea hearing along with other family members.

A few weeks prior to the killings, Mrs. Dick obtained a protection-from-abuse order against Mr. Dick. According to state police, she had sought protection-from-abuse orders several times before.

Mr. Dick, who has been married three times, has a reported history of violence against women and children. His wife, ex-wife and a former girlfriend all had protection-from-abuse orders against him, dating to 1993.

Mrs. Dick and the boys reportedly checked into the Stone Castle Motel on Jan. 9, 2006, after a custody hearing gave her primary custody of her 18-month-old son.

Mr. Dick was staying with them at the time of the killings, in violation of the protection-from-abuse order, state police said.

https://www.dailyitem.com/news/judge-child-killer-must-die/article_522c0494-7fcc-5430-9f13-d98239e9be81.html

Tedor Davido Pennsylvania Death Row

tedor davido pennsylvania

Tedor Davido was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for the murder of his girlfriend. According to court documents Tedor Davido would fatally beat his girlfriend after sexually assaulting her. Tedor Davido would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Tedor Davido 2022 Information

Parole Number: 300DL
Age: 45
Date of Birth: 01/28/1976
Race/Ethnicity: WHITE
Height: 5′ 07″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: LIGHT
Current Location: PHOENIX

Tedor Davido More News

. Prior to 2000, Tedor Davido served a sentence in Ohio for aggravated assault against a former girlfriend whom he had accused of having sexual relations with one of his brothers. In late April 2000, Appellant’s new girlfriend, Angelina Taylor, and her two-year-old son moved from Ohio to live with Appellant at 26 Hager Street in Lancaster. Appellant’s mother, sisters, brothers, and the girlfriend and children of Appellant’s brother, Spanky Davido, also resided there. On Sunday morning, May 14, 2000, an argument arose between Appellant and Ms. Taylor deriving from his suspicion that she had engaged in oral sex with Spanky Davido.

The dispute became violent, and Tedor Davido began beating and loudly berating Ms. Taylor, calling her a “whore” and a “bitch” that “sucks d* *k.” N.T. Trial, 12/5/01, at 59. Ms. Taylor begged Appellant to stop hitting her and asked Appellant’s sister for help. When Appellant’s sister told Appellant to stop beating Ms. Taylor, Appellant cursed at her and ordered her to leave. Ultimately, all of Appellant’s relatives left the residence, taking Ms. Taylor’s son with them, leaving only Appellant and Ms. Taylor inside. At 7:52 a.m., shortly after leaving the residence, Appellant’s sister called 911 from a pay phone several blocks away. After identifying herself as a neighbor, she reported that a man was beating a woman at 26 Hager Street.

Two police officers were immediately dispatched to investigate a “domestic situation” that involved a “man ․ hitting a woman[,]” and were informed en route that loud screaming had been heard from inside the residence. Id. at 80. The officers arrived at the residence shortly before 8:00 a.m., but all was quiet. They knocked at the front and back doors, but no one answered. They opened an unsecured window in the front of the house, announced themselves and listened for any response, but heard nothing. The officers radioed police dispatch for information regarding the 911 caller or for the phone number within the residence. The officers were told by dispatch that the 911 call had come from a pay phone and that no phone number was listed for the address. The officers heard a phone ringing inside but the call was not answered. Responding to a “gut feeling” that someone inside might be injured or otherwise in need of assistance, one officer entered the residence through an unsecured window, unlocked a deadbolt on the front door, and admitted the other officer. N.T. Trial, 12/5/01, at 84. The officers continued to announce themselves and their reason for being there, and proceeded to conduct a floor-to-floor, room-to-room search for any injured person who might have been in need of assistance.

Tedor Davido, who had been inside the house, heard the officers enter, and fled through a third-story window, wearing only a pair of sweatpants and socks. He ran along a rooftop, jumped onto a car parked in an adjacent alley, and then ran to the home of Michele Gray. He informed Ms. Gray that he had beaten Ms. Taylor, and that he had fled when he had heard the police in the house. He also told her that at the time he fled, Ms. Taylor had been pale, motionless, unresponsive, and having trouble breathing.

Meanwhile, the officers made their way to the rear bedroom on the third floor, where they discovered a woman, later identified as Angelina Taylor, naked under a sheet on a mattress on the floor. Ms. Taylor was seriously injured, with numerous bruises and cuts visible on her face and body, including her pelvic region, as well as severe bruising on both sides of her throat and around both eyes. Her eyes were open but she was completely unresponsive and having difficulty breathing. The officers called for emergency response personnel, who took the victim to the hospital. The police then secured the scene and obtained a search warrant for the residence.

At the hospital, the victim (initially identified as Jane Doe) was placed on life-support after being diagnosed as comatose due to bleeding in the brain. In the trauma unit, a rape-kit examination was conducted, which revealed numerous lacerations, bruises and abrasions inside and outside the victim’s vagina. A large quantity of motile sperm was removed from inside her vagina as well. The victim never regained consciousness and her brainstem herniated from the swelling inside her head. The victim was pronounced brain-dead at 4:55 p.m. on May 14, 2000, and was removed from life-support the next day, after her identity had been established and her parents, who had been contacted in Ohio, arrived at the hospital and gave their consent to end life-support.

After he left Michele Gray’s house, Tedor Davido fled to Harrisburg and stayed overnight at a motel under an assumed name. He returned to Lancaster the next day where, pursuant to a warrant, he was arrested on charges of murder and rape.1 After informing Appellant of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), the police questioned Appellant, who gave conflicting accounts of what had occurred. At first, Tedor Davido denied strangling the victim, but he later admitted that he had choked her with his hands, while denying that he used a cord or other ligature device. He theorized that the bruising on the victim’s neck could have come from her shirt, because he had pulled on it. He admitted slapping the victim but denied hitting her with a closed fist. When asked about the bruises on her body and face, he stated that the victim had fallen down the stairs from the second floor to the first floor and had landed on her face. He later explained that he and the victim had been standing near the top of the steps and that she had grabbed his shirt. He further stated that he then turned around and grabbed at her, and “she flew over my head like a dream” and tumbled down the steps face-first. N.T. Suppression Hearing, 3/28/01, at 55; N.T. Trial, 12/10/01, at 677.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1687041.html

Jermont Cox Pennsylvania Death Row

jermont cox

Jermont Cox was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for a murder. According to court documents Jermont Cox believed the victim was responsible for a recent robbery would shoot and kill the man as a payback. Jermont Cox would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Jermont Cox 2022 Information

Parole Number: 6639O
Age: 50
Date of Birth: 04/29/1971
Race/Ethnicity: BLACK
Height: 5′ 09″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: DARK
Current Location: PHOENIX

Jermont Cox More News

For the purposes of the present appeal, the pertinent facts may be summarized as follows. Jermont Cox was a low-level member of a Philadelphia drug operation run by Tim Walker (“Walker”). At some point in early 1992, two other members of the drug enterprise, Roosevelt Watson (“Watson”) and Terence Stewart (“Stewart”), had a falling out with Walker and left Walker’s organization. Watson subsequently robbed one of the houses out of which Walker sold drugs, and he and Stewart later stole Walker’s car. In retribution, Walker instructed Larry Lee (“Lee”), a higher-ranking member of the drug organization, to kill both Watson and Stewart. Lee enlisted Cox to assist in the murders. On August 18, 1992, Watson was shot and killed outside of a nightclub. On November 8, 1992, Stewart was shot and killed while driving his vehicle with a woman named Tia Seidle (“Seidle”), who was not injured although she was sitting in the passenger seat of his car.

In January 1993, the Philadelphia Police arrested Jermont Cox for the murder of a man named Lawrence Davis. In an attempt to secure favorable treatment from the prosecution, Cox indicated that he had information about Stewart’s murder. After being advised of his rights, Cox told the police that he was with Lee on the night of Stewart’s murder. Cox stated that Lee instructed Cox to drive to a particular location, where they found Stewart’s parked vehicle. Lee, who was carrying a semi-automatic weapon, told Cox that Stewart was one of the men who had stolen Walker’s car. Cox told the police that when Lee identified Stewart as one of the men who stole Walker’s car, he “knew what was happening.” N.T., 4/10/1995, at 14. Cox and Lee waited for approximately half an hour until Stewart and Seidle exited a residence, entered Stewart’s vehicle and drove away. Cox followed and pulled along the left side of Stewart’s vehicle, at which time Lee lowered his window and fired multiple shots at Stewart. Stewart lost control of his vehicle and crashed into another car, and Cox and Lee immediately fled the scene. The following day, Lee paid Jermont Cox $500.

After Jermont Cox made this confession, the police arrested him for Stewart’s murder. The police then asked Cox if he had any information about Watson’s murder, which they believed was related to Stewart’s murder. Cox told the police that he and Lee spent at least a week searching for Watson in order to kill him, but that they were unsuccessful. Cox told the police that Lee subsequently found and killed Watson by himself.

As Jermont Cox awaited trial on the Davis murder, he contacted the police to offer additional information about the Watson murder. Again, Cox wanted to share this information because he hoped to garner favorable treatment by cooperating with the police. Cox then confessed that he was with Lee when Lee received a telephonic page from Walker, informing them that Watson would be at a particular telephone booth outside of a nightclub. Cox drove them to the location described by Walker, where they waited for Watson. When Watson appeared, Lee exited the vehicle and shot Watson six times with a silver revolver. Cox then drove them from the scene of the shooting. Three days later, Lee paid Cox $500. Following this confession, the police charged Cox with Watson’s murder.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1749375.html

Terry Chamberlain Pennsylvania Death Row

Terry Chamberlain pennsylvania

Terry Chamberlain was sentenced to death by the State of Pennsylvania for a double murder. According to court documents Terry Chamberlain would go to his estranged wife’s home and fatally shoot her and her new boyfriend. Terry Chamberlin would be arrested, convicted and sentenced to death

Terry Chamberlain 2022 Information

Parole Number: 795GM
Age: 69
Date of Birth: 04/19/1952
Race/Ethnicity: WHITE
Height: 5′ 09″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: LIGHT
Current Location: PHOENIX

Terry Chamberlin More News

The record reflects the following.   Appellant’s estranged wife, Sherri Chamberlain, and her boyfriend, Gregory Inman, lived together.   They were found dead at their residence in the early morning hours of August 22, 1991.   Each victim had suffered multiple gunshot wounds.   Kim Ulrich, the victims’ next-door neighbor, was awakened by a telephone call at 2:24 that morning.   The call lasted about 2.5 seconds.   After Mrs. Ulrich picked up the telephone and said, “hello,” the caller stated, “call an ambulance-Terry shot Greg and me.”   When Mrs. Ulrich queried “Sherri?” the caller failed to respond.   Mrs. Ulrich could not recall hearing any background noise or voices during the 2:24 a.m. call.

Mrs. Ulrich then told her husband, Vaughn Ulrich, that appellant just shot Sherri and Greg Inman.   Vaughn Ulrich dressed and hurried to the Chamberlain residence which was about 100 yards from the Ulrich home.   As her husband left, Mrs. Ulrich called 911 to report that Terry Chamberlain had shot two victims.   Mr. Ulrich discovered the bodies of the victims about three minutes after the telephone call.   The handset of a wall-mounted telephone was found on the floor next to Sherri’s body.

No eyewitnesses and no physical evidence linked appellant to the murders.   No DNA testing was done on the blood samples to determine whether another person was possibly involved.   The only alleged link was the quoted conversation which the trial court admitted, over objection, as either an excited utterance or a dying declaration.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1396298.html