Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme Teen Killers Heavenly Creatures

Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme

Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme were two teen killers who would shock New Zealand back in 1954 when they would murder Honorah Rieper who was the mother of Pauline. According to court documents Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme would go for a walk with Honorah Rieper which would end with the two teen girls would beat the woman to death with part of a brick that was swung inside of a stock. Following the murder the two teen killers would return to a tea room where the three had lunch earlier and told the owners that Honorah Rieper had fallen and cut her face. Needless to say the story fell apart with the discovery of the body and Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme would be arrested. After a trial the two teen killers would spend the next five years in prison. Pauline Parker was given a new name once she was released from prison, now known as Hilary Nathan the young woman would move to England where she would run a riding camp for children. Juliet Hulme would also move to England where she would be now known as Anne Perry who had a career as a successful writer. It was not known until forty years after the murder that the writer Anne Perry was once known as the murderer Juliet Hulme

pauline parker and juliet hulme

Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme More News

This month marks 65 years since two distressed and blood-covered teenage girls ran out of a wooded area in Christchurch’s Victoria Park, crying for help.The couple who owned the tea kiosk in the park recognised them; they’d left the tearooms just a few minutes earlier after eating there with an older woman.One of the girls wailed, “Please help us, Mummy is hurt, covered in blood,” so Agnes Ritchie took them inside the kiosk while her husband Kenneth, thinking the woman had suffered a fall, headed off down the path they’d just come from, to see if there was anything he could do.A few minutes later and about 130 metres down the path, he found the battered body of Honorah Rieper (45). Her severe injuries suggested that this was no accident.The police were called and they discovered half a brick in a bloodied stocking thrown under some nearby trees.So began the investigation into a case that has gone down as one of the most intriguing in New Zealand’s criminal history and that is still a subject of fascination all these years later.

Known as the Parker-Hulme murder, the case shocked the nation because perpetrators Pauline Parker and Juliet Hulme were teenage girls, and the victim was Pauline’s mother.It was June 1954 and this kind of thing just didn’t happen in New Zealand.”The city of Christchurch is reeling,” wrote a commentator. “Teenage girls don’t go around murdering their mothers.”Honorah’s daughter Pauline Parker(16) was the first one taken away for questioning (at the time, both mother and daughter used the surname Rieper, but when it was realised that Honorah wasn’t married to her partner, Herbert Rieper, the courts used the legal surname of Parker for both the victim and the accused).A search of her home uncovered her diaries, in which Pauline had written about the “moider” she and Juliet (15) planned to commit. The entry for June 22, the day Honorah died, was headed, “The Day of the Happy Event”.Juliet was also arrested and charged with murder, and the subsequent trial was followed with bated breath by all New Zealanders.

It emerged the two girls had become close friends two-and-a-half years earlier when they met at Christchurch Girls’ High School.Their friendship initially seemed to be an unlikely one as they were from completely different backgrounds. British-born Juliet had emigrated to Christchurch from the UK when her father, physicist Dr Henry Hulme, landed a job as the rector of Canterbury University. She lived with her family in a rather grand home.Meanwhile, Pauline’s working-class, inner-city home doubled as a boarding house run by her mother Honorah, while her father worked in a fish shop.But class didn’t matter to the girls, who were both highly intelligent, and bonded over their love of books and their health problems. Pauline Parker had suffered from osteomyelitis, a painful bone infection, as a child; Juliet had a history of tuberculosis and had been sent at various times from the UK to the Bahamas and South Africa to recuperate in warmer weather.Both had lively imaginations and created a fantasy world that they went from writing about to acting out. They took on new names – Pauline was Gina, Juliet was Deborah – and were fascinated with a religion they dreamed up in which they worshipped “saints” based on celebrities such as opera singer Mario Lanza.Eventually, their obsession with this fantasy world became so all-encompassing that their parents met to discuss how to break up their intense friendship.A doctor they consulted said he believed the girls had a sexual relationship, something Juliet would later deny.Then came an opportunity to separate the two. Henry Hulme discovered his wife, Hilda, had been having an affair, and they decided to end the marriage. He planned to move to South Africa with Juliet and her brother Jonathan.Pauline Parker wanted to go with them, but was convinced her mother wouldn’t let her. So a plot was hatched to get rid of the obstacle who would no doubt prevent the two girls from being together: Honorah

At the trial in August 1954, Pauline’s diary was produced as evidence that her mother’s death was planned in advance. She had written about their intention to kill Honorah and make it look like an accident. She said Juliet was “worried but does not disagree violently”.On June 19, she wrote about the carefully worked-out plan, adding that they were “thrilled by the idea. Naturally we feel a trifle nervous but the pleasure of anticipation is great.”This was followed on June 21 by, “We decided to use a rock in a stocking, rather than a sandbag. We discussed the moider. I feel keyed up, as if I were planning a surprise party.”Honorah died the next day, suffering more than 20 blows to the head. Both girls eventually made full confessions, admitting that they had both battered Honorah with the brick.Their lawyers tried to say they were guilty by reason of insanity, and had no idea that what they did was wrong. Defence psychiatrists claimed the pair were delusional “due to homosexuality”. Thanks to claims such as these, the trial was a sensational affair.The defence alleged the pair were mad, while the prosecution described them as “dirty-minded girls”. They were found guilty and ended up spending five years each in prison – Pauline in Christchurch and Juliet in Auckland.

When she was released from prison, Juliet went back to England where she held down a variety of jobs. She also became a member of the Mormon Church and lived in America for a while.The public had no idea what had become of her until the 1994 release of Sir Peter Jackson’s film about the murder, Heavenly Creatures, inspired Kiwi journalist Lin Ferguson to track Juliet down.Hearing she’d changed her name and become a novelist, Lin checked the birth dates of writers until she found a match with a Scottish-based writer called Anne Perry.Not only did Anne turn out to be Juliet Hulme, but she was a very successful writer of crime books, with more than 20 million copies of her 100-plus novels and novellas in print. The fact a teenage killer was now making a living writing about murder became a huge story worldwide.Anne admitted to her past and has spoken to journalists, documentary makers and a biographer since, saying that she believed Pauline would have killed herself if she didn’t go along with the plan.Plus she felt she owed Pauline, who had written to her every single day when she was sent to a sanatorium for three months thanks to her tuberculosis.”The letters were a lifeline and I felt when she needed a lifeline, I owed her,” she told the Listener.She said she had made peace with what she did.”A long time ago, yes. Admit you’re wrong, say you’re sorry and then move on from there.”

Pauline’s whereabouts remained unknown for another two years, when journalist Chris Cooke located her also residing in the UK. She was living a reclusive life in a quiet village in Kent, teaching children to ride horses. She had changed her name to Hilary Nathan.Hilary didn’t want to talk about her past, but older sister Wendy explained that she was deeply religious and led a very solitary life.”She doesn’t have any contact with the outside world,” she said in a New Zealand Woman’s Weekly story.”She is a devout Roman Catholic and spends much of her time in prayer. She hasn’t got a TV or radio, so would never have heard what Anne Perry had to say and wouldn’t care.”Wendy revealed that Hilary told her their mother’s death was a situation that “got out of hand. She said it was something that grew and grew out of all proportion. After it happened, she was very sorry about it. It took her about five years to realise what she had done.”Hilary (now 81) later moved to Scotland, setting up home in the remote Orkney Islands. She has apparently had no contact with Anne (80), who now spends much of her time in Los Angeles, working on getting some of her books made into films.One book she won’t be writing is her autobiography. Although she did talk to biographer Joanne Drayton for the book The Search for Anne Perry, she has no desire to write her story herself, according to an interview she gave after her identity was revealed.”I don’t think I have the right to write about other people’s lives. I’m so tired of it anyway. I wish it would go away.”

https://www.nowtolove.co.nz/news/real-life/pauline-parker-juliet-hulme-murder-case-christchurch-where-now-anne-perry-hilary-nathan-41688

Ethan Orton Charged With Murdering Parents

ethan orton 2022

Seventeen year old Ethan Orton has been charged with two counts of murder for stabbing his parents to death. According to sources this alleged teen killer would stab to death his parents at their Cedar Rapids Iowa home. Casey Arthur Orton, 42, and Misty Scott-Slade, 41, were found deceased in their home back in October 14 2021. Ethan Orton lawyers may be planning an insantity defense which will be difficult after the seventeen year old was found competent to stand trial. If convicted on the murder charges Ethan Orton may spend the rest of his life in prison.

Ethan Orton More News

A Cedar Rapids teen charged with fatally stabbing his parents in October may claim insanity and diminished responsibility at his murder trial set for next month.

Ethan Alexander Orton, 17, charged as an adult with two counts of first-degree murder, was found competent to stand trial last week by a judge following a psychiatric evaluation.

He is accused of fatally stabbing his parents, Casey Arthur Orton, 42, and Misty Scott-Slade, 41, on Oct. 14 at their home in northeast Cedar Rapids.

Orton’s lawyers filed a notice of defense Tuesday, stating he “may rely on the defenses of insanity and diminished responsibility” at his Feb. 8 trial.

A competency evaluation helps a judge determine if a defendant understands the charges against him and if he is able to assist his lawyers with his defense at trial.

An insanity defense is a tougher threshold to meet because a jury must decide if a defendant will be held criminally responsible for his actions.

Guy Cook, a Des Moines lawyer, said the insanity defense under Iowa Law is tough to prove and rarely successful.

The prosecution must first prove the defendant committed the crime and then the burden shifts to the defense to prove the individual was legally insane when he or she committed the crime, he said.

“Simply put, the defendant must prove at the time he committed the crime he did not know right from wrong,” Cook told The Gazette on Wednesday.

According to Iowa code, insanity doesn’t have to exist for any specific length of time before or after a crime. The defendant must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that insanity is more likely true. This is a lesser burden to prove than beyond a reasonable doubt.

Cook said if a jury finds a defendant not guilty by reason of insanity, the judge commits the person to a state mental institution — the Iowa Medical and Classification Center in Coralville. The commitment continues as long as the person remains a danger to himself or others.

Closely related to the insanity defense is the defense of diminished responsibility, which also is difficult to prove, Cook said. The defense has to prove a defendant was unable to form the specific criminal intent to commit the crime.

“In other words, at the time of the crime, the defendant was unable to form the premeditated, deliberate, specific intent to kill,” Cook said. “Diminished responsibility, even if proven, however, does not entirely relieve the defendant of responsibility for his actions. It only prevents a conviction on first degree murder.”

A jury could find this defendant guilty on a lesser included charge, such as second-degree murder or manslaughter.

“Only a tiny fraction of defendants succeed with such a defense,” Cook pointed out. “Indeed in Iowa, over the years only a scattering of defendants have been successful with these defenses.”

Local prosecutors said they couldn’t recall any recent not-guilty verdicts because of insanity.

Among those who tried were Alexander Kozak, who claimed diminshed capacity, was convicted in Johnson County for killing a woman at the Coralville Mall in 2016 and Nicholas Luerkens, convicted in Linn County for fatally stabbing his ex-girlfriend in a Marion grocery store parking lot in 2015.

On appeal, Luerkens was granted a new trial because the court found the trial judge should have allowed the jury to consider his insanity defense. The trial judge ruled the defense hadn’t submitted sufficient evidence to present the insanity claim to the jury. In 2018, Luerkens pleaded guilty to first-degree murder and is serving a life sentence without parole.

Another defendant who claimed insanity, Greg Davis, was convicted in 2018 of killing his ex-girlfriend and concealing her body in a roll of carpet, but the verdict was overturned on appeal.

The court found the trial judge didn’t give an instruction to the jury regarding Davis’ insanity defense on the first-degree murder charge but did provide the instruction for lesser charges the jurors could consider.

The error allowed the jury to wrongly conclude the insanity defense didn’t apply to the first-degree murder charge, according to the court ruling.

Davis has a new trial set for Aug. 13.

Orton’s trial remains set for Feb. 8, but 6th Judicial District Judge Ian Thornhill said last week he would understand if more time is needed.

Ethan Orton would have to waive his right to trial within 90 days before the trial is rescheduled.

The court proceedings against Orton were temporarily suspended until the competency evaluation was completed.

Cedar Rapids police received a 911 call about 2:10 a.m. Oct. 14 regarding suspicious noises coming from the Orton house at 361 Carnaby Dr. NE, according to a criminal complaint.

Officers said they found the teen soaked in blood outside the home and that Ethan Orton admitted to killing his parents, who were found inside the home. He stabbed both parents with a knife and used an ax to finish killing his mother, he told investigators.

Ethan Orton said he killed them “to take charge of his life,” according to the complaint.

The teen remains in jail under a $2 million cash-only bail. First-degree murder is a life sentence without parole, but because he is a juvenile, he would have the opportunity for parole if convicted.

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb Teen Killers

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb were two teen killers who were raised in households full of love and money however the two would attempt to pull off the perfect murder. In this article we are going to take a closer look at Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb and the murder of Bobby Franks.

Nathan Leopold Early Life

nathan leopold teen killer photos

Nathan Leopold was born in Chicago on November 19, 1904 to Florence and Nathan Leopold. His parents believed that their son was a prodigy as he allegedly spoke his first word at just four months old. Nathan Leopold would study a number of languages and claimed to be fluent in five of them. Nathan Leopold was also well versed in Ornithology, the study of birds,

Richard Loeb Early Years

richard loeb teen killer photos

Richard Loeb was born on June 11, 1905 to Anna Henrietta and Albert Loeb who was a lawyer and a former vice president of a bank. Richard Loeb who would become the youngest person to graduate University of Michigan at seventeen years old. Loeb also enjoyed to socialize, play tennis and read detective novels.

Nathan Leopold And Richard Loeb Beginnings

Even though Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb met at a young age as they both grew up in the same wealthy neighborhood they did not real become acquainted until years later when the began to interact at the University of Chicago. Turns out they both had a deep interest in crime and soon they would begin their experimenting in the criminal lifestyle.

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb would start out small with incidents of vandalism and theft. The two would break into a frat house at the University of Chicago where they would steal a penknife and a typewriter. Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb would move on to arson but when they did not get noticed for their crime they decided to plan and pull off the perfect murder

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb – Bobby Franks Murder

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb bobby franks
Bobby Franks

Bobby Franks was a fourteen year old boy who attended the Harvard School For Boys and was from the same neighborhood as Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb as well was a second cousin to Richard and had been over to the Loeb household on a number of occasions.

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb would pick up Bobby Franks as he was walking home from school. The two teen killers began to pull off their plan. Bobby Franks was sitting in the front passenger seat when he was struck several times by Richard Loeb with a chisel. Nathan Leopold would drive to a prearranged destination near Wolf Lake in Hammond Indiana.

Once it was dark Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb would take Bobby Franks body and throw it in a culvert before dousing it with hydrocloric acid which they believed would make his identity that much harder to figure out. Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb would drive back to Chicago

Nathan Leopold would call Bobby Franks mother and would tell her that her son was kidnapped and to follow a number of instructions if she wanted to see her son alive. The instructions which were typed on the typewriter they had stolen earlier and sent to the Franks residence. However before the instructions could be completed the body of Bobby Franks was found.

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb would destroy the typewriter and other pieces of evidence that tied them to the crime however a pair of glasses belonging to Nathan was found at the crime scene. Turns out only three people in the Chicago area had that particular pair of glasses with a unique hinge. Soon police were questioning Nathan Leopold about the murder of Bobby Franks. Nathan would tell police that he and Richard Loeb were driving around Chicago and picked up two women however their chauffeur denied this and the two were arrested.

Richard Loeb would confess first and attempted to blame the kidnapping and murder of Bobby Franks on Nathan Leopold. Nathan Leopold would later write a book in which he blamed the murder on Loeb. It has never been clear who struck the fatal wound that would kill Bobby Franks

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb Trial

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb would go on trial in Chicago and their lawyer would be famed attorney Clarence Darrow who was reportedly paid $70,000 (equivalent to a million dollars now) to defend the teen killers. Even Clarence Darrow was not able to get Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb off however he did save them from the death penalty. Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb would be sentenced to life in prison plus ninety nine years in prison for the kidnapping and murder of Bobby Franks

Clarence Darrow Speech At The Nathan Leopold And Richard Loeb Trial

This terrible crime was inherent in his organism, and it came from some ancestor. Is any blame attached because somebody took Nietzsche’s philosophy seriously and fashioned his life upon it? It is hardly fair to hang a 19-year-old boy for the philosophy that was taught him at the university.

Now your Honor I have spoken about the war, I believed in it. I don’t know whether I was crazy or not. Sometimes I think perhaps I was. I approved of it; I joined in the general cry of madness and despair. I urged men to fight, I was safe because I was too old to go. I was like the rest. What did they do? Right or wrong, justifiable or unjustifiable – which I need not discuss today; it changed the world. For four long years the civilized world was engaged in killing men. Christian against Christian, barbarian uniting with Christians to kill Christians; anything to kill. It was taught in every school, aye in the Sunday schools. The little children played at war. The toddling children on the street. Do you suppose this world has ever been the same since? How long your Honor, will it take for the world to get back the humane emotions that were slowly growing before the war? How long will it take the callused hearts of men before the scars of hatred and cruelty shall be removed?

We read of killing one hundred thousand men in a day. We read about it and we rejoiced in it—if it was the other fellows who were killed. We were fed on flesh and drank blood. Even down to the prattling babe. I need not tell you how many upright, honorable young boys have come into this court charged with murder, some saved and some sent to their death, boys who fought in this war and learned to place a cheap value on human life. You know it and I know it. These boys were brought up in it. The tales of death were in their homes, their playgrounds, their schools; they were in the newspapers that they read; it was a part of the common frenzy – what was a life? It was nothing. It was the least sacred thing in existence and these boys were trained to this cruelty.

It will take fifty years to wipe it out of the human heart, if ever. I know this, that after the Civil War in 1865, crimes of this sort increased, marvelously. No one needs to tell me that crime has no cause. It has as definite a cause as any other disease, and I know that out of the hatred and bitterness of the Civil War crime increased as America had never seen before. I know that Europe is going through the same experience today; I know it has followed every war; and I know it has influenced these boys so that life was not the same to them as it would have been if the world had not made red with blood. I protest against the crimes and mistakes of society being visited upon them. All of us have a share in it. I have mine. I cannot tell and I shall never know how many words of mine might have given birth to cruelty in place of love and kindness and charity.

Your Honor knows that in this very court crimes of violence have increased growing out of the war. Not necessarily by those who fought but by those that learned that blood was cheap, and human life was cheap, and if the State could take it lightly why not the boy? There are causes for this terrible crime. There are causes as I have said for everything that happens in the world. War is a part of it; education is a part of it; birth is a part of it; money is a part of it—all these conspired to compass the destruction of these two poor boys.

Has the court any right to consider anything but these two boys? The State says that your Honor has a right to consider the welfare of the community, as you have. If the welfare of the community would be benefited by taking these lives, well and good. I think it would work evil that no one could measure. Has your Honor a right to consider the families of these defendants? I have been sorry, and I am sorry for the bereavement of Mr. and Mrs. Franks, for those broken ties that cannot be healed. All I can hope and wish is that some good may come from it all. But as compared with the families of Leopold and Loeb, the Franks are to be envied—and everyone knows it.

I do not know how much salvage there is in these two boys. I hate to say it in their presence, but what is there to look forward to? I do not know but what your Honor would be merciful to them, but not merciful to civilization, and not merciful if you tied a rope around their necks and let them die; merciful to them, but not merciful to civilization, and not merciful to those who would be left behind. To spend the balance of their days in prison is mighty little to look forward to, if anything. Is it anything? They may have the hope that as the years roll around they might be released. I do not know. I do not know. I will be honest with this court as I have tried to be from the beginning. I know that these boys are not fit to be at large. I believe they will not be until they pass through the next stage of life, at forty-five or fifty. Whether they will then, I cannot tell. I am sure of this, that I will not be here to help them. So far as I am concerned, it is over.

I would not tell this court that I do not hope that some time, when life and age have changed their bodies, as they do, and have changed their emotions, as they do—that they may once more return to life. I would be the last person on earth to close the door of hope to any human being that lives, and least of all to my clients. But what have they to look forward to? Nothing. And I think here of the stanza of Housman:

Now hollow fires burn out to black, / And lights are fluttering low:
Square your shoulders, lift your pack / And leave your friends and go.
O never fear, lads, naught’s to dread, / Look not left nor right:
In all the endless road you tread / There’s nothing but the night.

I care not your Honor, whether the march begins at the gallows or when the gates of Joliet close upon them, there is nothing but the night, and that is little for any human being to expect.

But there are others to consider. Here are these two families who have led honest lives, who will bear the name that they bear, and future generations must carry it on.

Here is Leopold’s father – and this boy was the pride of his life. He watched him and he cared for him, he worked for him; the boy was brilliant and accomplished. He educated him, and he thought that fame and position awaited him, as it should have awaited. It is a hard thing for a father to see his life’s hopes crumble into dust.

Should he be considered? Should his brothers be considered? Will it do society any good or make your life safer, or any human being’s life safer, if it should be handed down from generation to generation that this boy, their kin died upon the scaffold?

And Loeb’s the same. Here are the faithful uncle and brother, who have watched here day by day, while Dickie’s father and his mother are too ill to stand this terrific strain, and shall be waiting for a message which means more to them than it can mean to you or me. Shall these be taken into account in this general bereavement?

Have they any rights? Is there any reason, your Honor, why their proud names and all the future generations that bear them shall have this bar sinister written across them? How many boys and girls, how many unborn children will feel it? It is bad enough as it is, God knows. It is bad enough, however it is. But it’s not yet death on the scaffold. It’s not that. And I ask your Honor, in addition to all that I have said to save two honorable families from a disgrace that never ends, and which could be of no avail to help any human being that lives.

Now, I must say a word more and then I will leave this with you where I should have left it long ago. None of us are unmindful of the public; courts are not, and juries are not. We placed our fate in the hands of a trained court, thinking that he would be more mindful and considerate than a jury. I cannot say how people feel. I have stood here for three months as one might stand at the ocean trying to sweep back the tide. I hope the seas are subsiding and the wind is falling, and I believe they are, but I wish to make no false pretense to this court. The easy thing and the popular thing to do is to hang my clients. I know it. Men and women who do not think will applaud. The cruel and thoughtless will approve. It will be easy today; but in Chicago, and reaching out over the length and breadth of the land, more and more fathers and mothers, the humane, the kind and the hopeful, who are gaining an understanding and asking questions not only about these poor boys, but about their own – these will join in no acclaim at the death of my clients.

These would ask that the shedding of blood be stopped, and that the normal feelings of man resume their sway. And as the days and the months and the years go on, they will ask it more and more. But, your Honor, what they shall ask may not count. I know the easy way. I know the future is with me, and what I stand for here; not merely for the lives of these two unfortunate lads, but for all boys and all girls; for all of the young, and as far as possible, for all of the old. I am pleading for life, understanding, charity, kindness, and the infinite mercy that considers all. I am pleading that we overcome cruelty with kindness and hatred with love. I know the future is on my side. Your Honor stands between the past and the future. You may hang these boys; you may hang them by the neck until they are dead. But in doing it you will turn your face toward the past. In doing it you are making it harder for every other boy who in ignorance and darkness must grope his way through the mazes which only childhood knows. In doing it you will make it harder for unborn children. You may save them and make it easier for every child that sometime may stand where these boys stand. You will make it easier for every human being with an aspiration and a vision and a hope and a fate. I am pleading for the future; I am pleading for a time when hatred and cruelty will not control the hearts of men. When we can learn by reason and judgment and understanding and faith that all life is worth saving, and that mercy is the highest attribute of man.

I feel that I should apologize for the length of time I have taken. This case may not be as important as I think it is, and I am sure I do not need to tell this court, or to tell my friends that I would fight just as hard for the poor as for the rich. If I should succeed, my greatest reward and my greatest hope will be that for the countless unfortunates who must tread the same road in blind childhood that these poor boys have trod—that I have done something to help human understanding, to temper justice with mercy, to overcome hate with love.

I was reading last night of the aspiration of the old Persian poet, Omar Khayyam. It appealed to me as the highest that I can vision. I wish it was in my heart, and I wish it was in the hearts of all:

So I be written in the Book of Love,
I do not care about that Book above.
Erase my name or write it as you will,
So I be written in the Book of Love.

Richard Loeb Death

Richard Loeb and Nathan Leopold would be reconnected at Statesville Prison in Illinois and the two would improve the school curriculum by adding both a high school and junior college aspect to the program. In 1936 Richard Loeb would be murdered in prison with a straight razor by James Day who would claim that Loeb had propositioned him. Later James Day was deemed to have acted in self defense in the murder of Richard Loeb and was acquitted.

Nathan Leopold Death

Nathan Leopold would serve over thirty years in prison before he was released in 1958. Leopold who had written a book entitled Life Plus Ninety Nine Years would eventually move to Puerto Rico where he would marry and would eventually die in 1971 from a heart attack.

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb FAQ

Nathan Leopold Death

Nathan Leopold died of a heart attack in 1971

Richard Loeb Death

Richard Loeb was murdered in prison in 1936 by James Day

Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb Videos

Joshua Nelson Florida Death Row

joshua nelson

Joshua Nelson was sentenced to death by the State of Florida for a robbery murder. According to court documents Joshua Nelson and Keith Brennan planned to rob an acquaintance of theirs in order to steal his car. The pair would beat Tommy Owens to death with a baseball bat and by multiple stab wounds. Joshua Nelson and Keith Brennan would take the car and leave town. Joshua Nelson was eighteen years old when the robbery and murder took place and was sentenced to death. Keith Brennan was eight days shy of his eighteenth birthday so this teen killer would be sentenced to life.

Florida Death Row Inmate List

Joshua Nelson 2021 Information

DC Number:989102
Name:NELSON, JOSHUA D
Race:WHITE
Sex:MALE
Birth Date:01/16/1977
Initial Receipt Date:12/10/1996
Current Facility:UNION C.I.
Current Custody:MAXIMUM
Current Release Date:DEATH SENTENCE

Keith Brennan 2021 Information

keith brennan
ID Photo
DC Number:989103
Name:BRENNAN, KEITH M
Race:WHITE
Sex:MALE
Birth Date:03/18/1978
Initial Receipt Date:03/26/1997
Current Facility:OUT OF DEPT. CUSTODY BY COURT ORDER
Current Custody:CLOSE
Current Release Date:SENTENCED TO LIFE

Joshua Nelson More News

The evidence presented at trial established the following facts.   Nelson and Keith Brennan wanted to leave the city of Cape Coral.   The two devised a plan to murder Tommy Owens and steal his car.   Nelson and Brennan knew that Owens kept a baseball bat in his car.   On the evening of March 10, 1995, Owens was lured under false pretenses to a remote street.   Nelson and Brennan were able to convince Owens to exit his car, whereupon Nelson hit Owens with the bat.   After a number of blows, Owens eventually fell to the ground.   Nelson and Brennan tied Owens’ legs and arms.   Owens pleaded for his life, stating that the two could take his car.   After a brief discussion, Nelson and Brennan concluded that to avoid being caught, they should kill Owens.   Brennan attempted to slice Owens’ throat with a box cutter.   Owens was not unconscious when the attacks began and he begged Nelson to hit him again with the bat so as to knock him unconscious before the stabbing continued.   Nelson did as Owens requested and Brennan continued to attack Owens with the box cutter.   Nelson and Brennan also continued to strike Owens a number of times with the bat.   The two eventually dragged Owens’ body to nearby bushes, where Owens later died.

Nelson and Brennan picked up Tina Porth and Misty Porth and the four left the city in Owens’ car.   After stopping in Daytona Beach, the four left the state and drove to New Jersey.   At different times during the trip, Nelson and Brennan informed Tina and Misty that they had murdered Owens.   Both Tina and Misty testified at trial.

Nelson and Brennan were apprehended by law enforcement officers in New Jersey.   Nelson gave a video- and audio-taped confession.   In the confession, Nelson detailed his account of the murder, both at the crime scene and at the place where the bat was recovered.   The video-taped confession was played to the jury.   Additionally, an analyst for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement testified that blood stains on Nelson’s shoes, the box cutter, and a pair of underwear that the box cutter was wrapped in all matched Owens’ DNA.

Nelson was found guilty of first-degree murder and robbery with a deadly weapon.   At the penalty phase, the jury recommenced death by a twelve-zero vote.   The trial court found three aggravators:  (1) the murder was committed in the course of a robbery;  (2) the murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel (HAC);  and (3) the murder was committed in a cold, calculated, and premeditated manner without any pretense of legal or moral justification (CCP).   The trial court also found that one statutory mitigator (age of eighteen at the time of the crime) and fifteen nonstatutory mitigators 1 were established.   The statutory mitigator was given great weight.   The first nonstatutory mitigator was given substantial weight, and the remaining nonstatutory mitigators were given from moderate to little weight.   The trial court concluded that Nelson failed to establish the following statutory mitigators:  (1) that he acted under the effect of extreme emotional disturbance, (2) that he was an accomplice with minor participation, (3) that he acted under the domination of another person, and (4) that his capacity to appreciate the criminality of his conduct was impaired.   The trial court followed the jury’s recommendation and imposed the death penalty for the first-degree murder conviction.   The trial court sentenced Nelson to 189 months in prison for the robbery conviction

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-supreme-court/1403380.html

Jason Sweeney Murder

jason sweeney murder

Jason Sweeney was a sixteen year old from Fishtown, Pennsylvania who would be brutally murdered by the girl he was dating, a friend since childhood and two brothers. Jason Sweeney had recently started dating Justina Morley a troubled fifteen year old girl. Jason who had been working construction was excited for the date he had that night with Justina Morley.

Justina Morley would invite him to meet her at a wooded area so the two of them could have sex. What Jason Sweeney did not know was that his friend Edward Batzig Jr and two brothers, Nicholas and Domenic Coia were lying in wait so they could rob him of his paycheck

Edward Batzig Jr would strike Jason Sweeney first which was quickly followed by Nicholas and Domenic Coia who would also attack. Jason Sweeney reportedly begged Edward Batzig Jr to stop however his so called friend would hit him repeatedly with an axe. The three teen killers would finish by smashing Jason Sweeney skull in with a large rock.

Justina Morley, Edward Batzig Jr, Nicholas and Domenic Coia would steal the money out of Jason’s pocket and reportedly the four shared a group hug

The four would spend the money on jewelry and drugs. It would not take long for police to figure out who was responsible for the murder of Jason Sweeney

Justina Morley lawyers would attempt to keep her case in juvenile court as they brought up her struggles with mental health and drug addiction however the prosecutors just pointed at the severity of the crimes that she was charged with. Justina Morley would be tried as an adult and would agree to testify against the three others in exchange for a reduced sentence.

Edward Batzig Jr, Nicholas Coia and Domenic Coia would all be found guilty and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Many believed that Justina Morley was the ringleader and that prosecutors did not need her testimony in order to convict the other three and she deserved a life sentence for her actions.

Justina Morley would be released from prison in 2020.

Jason Sweeney Killers Update

dominic coia 2021
Domenic Coia

Parole Number: GE5575
Age: 35
Date of Birth: 06/13/1985
Race/Ethnicity: WHITE
Height: 5′ 10″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: LIGHT
Current Location: GREENE

nicholas coia 2021
Nicholas Coia

Parole Number: GE6387
Age: 34
Date of Birth: 08/30/1986
Race/Ethnicity: WHITE
Height: 5′ 06″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: LIGHT
Current Location: SOMERSET

edward batzig
Edward Batzig Jr

Parole Number: GE6503
Age: 34
Date of Birth: 10/05/1986
Race/Ethnicity: WHITE
Height: 6′ 00″
Gender: MALE
Citizenship: USA
Complexion: LIGHT
Current Location: CHESTER

justina morley 2021
Justina Morley

Inmate Number: OJ6487
Age: 33
Date of Birth: 03/07/1988
Race/Ethnicity: White
Height: 5′ 04″
Weight (lbs): 142
Gender: Female
Complexion: FAIR
District Office: Allentown DO
County of Residence: BUCKS
State: PENNSYLVANIA
Release Date: 12/10/2020